Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton

[BDKJMU]

Hillary caught wearing earpiece during candidate forum hosted by Matt Lauer?

[93henfan]

I guess Gary Johnson won't forget where Aleppo is anytime soon. If that had happened to Drumpf or Hildabitch, a "sound bite" would have become three days of "in-depth analysis."

He didn't forget. He obviously never knew.


Questioner: What would you do, if you were elected, about Aleppo?

Johnson: About?

Questioner: Allepo.

Johnson: And what is Allepo?

Questioner: You're kidding?

Johnson: No.

Questioner: Allepo is in Syria.



Wow. Just wow.

[Ivytalk]

I guess Gary Johnson won't forget where Aleppo is anytime soon. If that had happened to Drumpf or Hildabitch, a "sound bite" would have become three days of "in-depth analysis."

He didn't forget. He obviously never knew.


Questioner: What would you do, if you were elected, about Aleppo?

Johnson: About?

Questioner: Allepo.

Johnson: And what is Allepo?

Questioner: You're kidding?

Johnson: No.

Questioner: Allepo is in Syria.



Wow. Just wow.

In your zeal to protect your hero, Drumpf, you took the use of the term "forget" in my e-mail out of context, as any honest reading of it will show. Obviously, it wasn't a good moment for him, but it's not disqualifying. Unfortunately, it will give Trumpkins and Hildabots an excuse to claim that the party duopoly should be preserved, because Libertarians can never be taken seriously on foreign policy matters.

By the way, 93, who's the prime minister of Montenegro?

[DSUrocks07]

He didn't forget. He obviously never knew.


Questioner: What would you do, if you were elected, about Aleppo?

Johnson: About?

Questioner: Allepo.

Johnson: And what is Allepo?

Questioner: You're kidding?

Johnson: No.

Questioner: Allepo is in Syria.



Wow. Just wow.

In your zeal to protect your hero, Drumpf, you took the use of the term "forget" in my e-mail out of context, as any honest reading of it will show. Obviously, it wasn't a good moment for him, but it's not disqualifying. Unfortunately, it will give Trumpkins and Hildabots an excuse to claim that the party duopoly should be preserved, because Libertarians can never be taken seriously on foreign policy matters.

By the way, 93, who's the prime minister of Montenegro?

Herman Cain got crucified in 2012 because he came out and said that he would have to discuss foreign policy decisions with his advisors before taking any actions.

The duopolists don't want a President, they want to choose a king (or queen) with absolute power. That's where we are as a country now.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

[CID1990]

I guess Gary Johnson won't forget where Aleppo is anytime soon. If that had happened to Drumpf or Hildabitch, a "sound bite" would have become three days of "in-depth analysis."

That he doesn't know about Aleppo raises him a few notches in my book.

We could use a President who knows more about Akron than Aleppo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[93henfan]

I guess Gary Johnson won't forget where Aleppo is anytime soon. If that had happened to Drumpf or Hildabitch, a "sound bite" would have become three days of "in-depth analysis."

That he doesn't know about Aleppo raises him a few notches in my book.

We could use a President who knows more about Akron than Aleppo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Now there's a good sound bite. You better call up the Johnson campaign before I find their number because I'm stealing that. Knows Akron better than Aleppo. Fuck yes that's gold, son.

[93henfan]

Btw CID, I'm sitting here over GWU/Foggy Bottom station checking out all these college sluts in their sundresses. You all got the best scenery over here.

[GannonFan]

The coupling of Johnson not knowing what Aleppo was with his known marijuana usage is just comedy gold.

[89Hen]

Hillary caught wearing earpiece during candidate forum hosted by Matt Lauer?

[UNI88]

Great nugget from an opinion piece in the Chicago Tribune:

Her problem is that she has always been Hillary Clinton, understood to be a liar, the Democratic Nixon in pants suits.

Hillary, how can this be? Isn't the race over?
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/colu ... olumn.html

[UNI88]

And IT's buddy Steve Chapman makes a much better case on why a Trump presidency would be bad news. JSO, you might want to take some notes, these arguments are much more compelling than yours.

The worst case for Republicans: Donald Trump wins
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opin ... olumn.html

Winning the election would turbocharge Trump's worst impulses. He would have new grounds to ignore GOP leaders and indulge his every whim. If that approach gets him elected, why would he behave any differently as president?

[Skjellyfetti]

And IT's buddy Steve Chapman makes a much better case on why a Trump presidency would be bad news. JSO, you might want to take some notes, these arguments are much more compelling than yours.

The worst case for Republicans: Donald Trump wins
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opin ... olumn.html

Winning the election would turbocharge Trump's worst impulses. He would have new grounds to ignore GOP leaders and indulge his every whim. If that approach gets him elected, why would he behave any differently as president?

Why is that a better argument?

This argument is that Donald Trump's election would be detrimental to the Republican Party.

JSO's argument is that Donald Trump winning would be detrimental to the country.

I don't really disagree that Trump winning would damage the GOP long term....... but, the best reason to not vote for Trump isn't because of the damage he'd do to the GOP but to the fucking country.

[BDKJMU]

"Hillary's Health Concerns Serious, Say Most Doctors Polled by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)

TUCSON, Ariz., Sept. 8, 2016 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Concerns about Hillary Clinton's health are "serious—could be disqualifying for the position of President of the U.S.," say nearly 71% of 250 physicians responding to an informal internet survey by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). About 20% said concerns were "likely overblown, but should be addressed as by full release of medical records." Only 2.7% responded that they were "just a political attack; I have confidence in the letter from her physician and see no cause for concern."

While more than 81% were aware of her history of a concussion, only 59% were aware of the cerebral sinus thrombosis, and 52% of the history of deep venous thrombosis.

More than 78% said the health concerns had received "not enough emphasis" in the media, and only 2.7% that there had been "too much emphasis."

Nearly two-thirds said that a physician who had a concern about a candidate's fitness to serve for health reasons should "make the concerns known to the public." Only 11% said a physician should "keep silent unless he had personally examined the patient," and 10% that the candidate's health was "off limits for public discussion."......."
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases ... 25065.html

[Skjellyfetti]

Can't trust polls of physicians until September 20

[UNI88]

And IT's buddy Steve Chapman makes a much better case on why a Trump presidency would be bad news. JSO, you might want to take some notes, these arguments are much more compelling than yours.

The worst case for Republicans: Donald Trump wins
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opin ... olumn.html

Why is that a better argument?

This argument is that Donald Trump's election would be detrimental to the Republican Party.

JSO's argument is that Donald Trump winning would be detrimental to the country.

I don't really disagree that Trump winning would damage the GOP long term....... but, the best reason to not vote for Trump isn't because of the damage he'd do to the GOP but to the **** country.

That might be true if we had a different Democratic candidate but I'm not sure that Trump would do more damage to the country than Hillary. Having either one of them in the White House is a scary thought.

Calling Hillary a Democratic Nixon really isn't fair to Nixon.

[93henfan]

That might be true if we had a different Democratic candidate but I'm not sure that Trump would do more damage to the country than Hillary. Having either one of them in the White House is a scary thought.

Calling Hillary a Democratic Nixon really isn't fair to Nixon.

Nailed it.

[Skjellyfetti]

That might be true if we had a different Democratic candidate but I'm not sure that Trump would do more damage to the country than Hillary. Having either one of them in the White House is a scary thought.

And, that's fair enough.

But, we were discussing JSO's reasons for being anti-Trump.

Being anti-Trump because he'll damage the country is a better reason than being anti-Trump because he'll damage the GOP.

[kalm]

Why is that a better argument?

This argument is that Donald Trump's election would be detrimental to the Republican Party.

JSO's argument is that Donald Trump winning would be detrimental to the country.

I don't really disagree that Trump winning would damage the GOP long term....... but, the best reason to not vote for Trump isn't because of the damage he'd do to the GOP but to the **** country.

That might be true if we had a different Democratic candidate but I'm not sure that Trump would do more damage to the country than Hillary. Having either one of them in the White House is a scary thought.

Calling Hillary a Democratic Nixon really isn't fair to Nixon.

Nixon did some really good things.

[YoUDeeMan]

He didn't forget. He obviously never knew.


Questioner: What would you do, if you were elected, about Aleppo?

Johnson: About?

Questioner: Allepo.

Johnson: And what is Allepo?

Questioner: You're kidding?

Johnson: No.

Questioner: Allepo is in Syria.



Wow. Just wow.

In your zeal to protect your hero, Drumpf, you took the use of the term "forget" in my e-mail out of context, as any honest reading of it will show. Obviously, it wasn't a good moment for him, but it's not disqualifying. Unfortunately, it will give Trumpkins and Hildabots an excuse to claim that the party duopoly should be preserved, because Libertarians can never be taken seriously on foreign policy matters.

By the way, 93, who's the prime minister of Montenegro?

Is it a Negroan?

[93henfan]

In your zeal to protect your hero, Drumpf, you took the use of the term "forget" in my e-mail out of context, as any honest reading of it will show. Obviously, it wasn't a good moment for him, but it's not disqualifying. Unfortunately, it will give Trumpkins and Hildabots an excuse to claim that the party duopoly should be preserved, because Libertarians can never be taken seriously on foreign policy matters.

By the way, 93, who's the prime minister of Montenegro?

Is it a Negroan?

Yes, and his name is Monte.

[SDHornet]

Can't trust polls of physicians until September 20

[SDHornet]

I guess Gary Johnson won't forget where Aleppo is anytime soon. If that had happened to Drumpf or Hildabitch, a "sound bite" would have become three days of "in-depth analysis."

He didn't forget. He obviously never knew.


Questioner: What would you do, if you were elected, about Aleppo?

Johnson: About?

Questioner: Allepo.

Johnson: And what is Allepo?

Questioner: You're kidding?

Johnson: No.

Questioner: Allepo is in Syria.



Wow. Just wow.

And yet I still won't hesitate to vote for him over Trump or hilldog.

Oh and fuck Syria and all the other raghead countries dealing with ISIS.

[89Hen]

And yet I still won't hesitate to vote for him over Trump or hilldog.

So you're just a lemming of a different color. Gotcha.

[93henfan]

He didn't forget. He obviously never knew.


Questioner: What would you do, if you were elected, about Aleppo?

Johnson: About?

Questioner: Allepo.

Johnson: And what is Allepo?

Questioner: You're kidding?

Johnson: No.

Questioner: Allepo is in Syria.



Wow. Just wow.

And yet I still won't hesitate to vote for him over Trump or hilldog.

Oh and fuck Syria and all the other raghead countries dealing with ISIS.

What excactly would Johnson do better than Trump? No offense, but Johnson comes off to me as a person who shouldn't even be a third party candidate. He has neither intelligence, wit, nor charisma. That's a very, very bad trifecta for a politician and even an everyday regular Joe. Just a terrible candidate.

Why anyone would effectively vote for Hillary Clinton by making some shortsighted cute little stand against the man by voting for dimwit Johnson is beyond me.

When did all you so-called conservatives lose your spines?

[Ibanez]

And yet I still won't hesitate to vote for him over Trump or hilldog.

Oh and fuck Syria and all the other raghead countries dealing with ISIS.

What excactly would Johnson do better than Trump. No offense, but Johnson comes off to me as a person who shouldn't even be a third party candidate. He has neither intelligence, wit, nor charisma. That's a very, very bad trifecta for a politician and even an everyday regular Joe. Just a terrible candidate.

The same could be said for Trump.


Certainly for Clinton.