If I have made mistakes in my posts which requires correction, please give me the opportunity to do so.grizzaholic wrote:...Likewise.
Did I answer your previous question?

If I have made mistakes in my posts which requires correction, please give me the opportunity to do so.grizzaholic wrote:...Likewise.

But it can also be put at risk with unnecessary actions such as Vietnam and Iraq. This is why I will never support wars of these kind. I hope our troops are ok but hate that we had to out them there for no reason.native wrote:Well crafted post, Appy, but as you know, freedom isn't free and cannot be maintaned without sacrfice.Appaholic wrote:
Sorry, not to diminish what McCain nor any other POW experienced at the hands of torturous interrogaters, let's not confuse their experience with "sacrificing for my freedom"....my freedom was bestowed upon me the day I was born, not earned by fighting a police action, advising, whatever in Vietnam....had my or any other American's freedom been dependent on the outcome of the Vietnam war, we probably wouldn't have the luxury of arguing this topic on an unfiltered message board......
Whether or not the particular sacrifice is or is not on your list of aproved sacrifices, the value of the willingness to sacrifice and the effort to maintain the faith under extreme duress is priceless. Unfortunately, it takes thousands and thousands of such sacrifices, even though some may, in hindsight, be misdirected.
My family members who spent years in communist prison camps in SE Asia may disagree with your characterization of our efforts there.


As well they should given their experiences....no one likes to be told their efforts were in vain.....and freedom isn't free, but I'm finding more serious threats to our freedoms from our own shores, not those in SE Asia, Middle East, etc.....I admire their sacrifice, however misguided it may have been after the fact, but let's get some levity and clarity on what they were truly sacrificing for, not the company line sold as a bill of goods wrapped in the American flag.....native wrote:Well crafted post, Appy, but as you know, freedom isn't free and cannot be maintaned without sacrfice.Appaholic wrote:
Sorry, not to diminish what McCain nor any other POW experienced at the hands of torturous interrogaters, let's not confuse their experience with "sacrificing for my freedom"....my freedom was bestowed upon me the day I was born, not earned by fighting a police action, advising, whatever in Vietnam....had my or any other American's freedom been dependent on the outcome of the Vietnam war, we probably wouldn't have the luxury of arguing this topic on an unfiltered message board......
Whether or not the particular sacrifice is or is not on your list of aproved sacrifices, the value of the willingness to sacrifice and the effort to maintain the faith under extreme duress is priceless. Unfortunately, it takes thousands and thousands of such sacrifices, even though some may, in hindsight, be misdirected.
My family members who spent years in communist prison camps in SE Asia may disagree with your characterization of our efforts there.

Bingo....thanks Slycat, you've said a heluva alot better and with more tact what my original point was.....slycat wrote:But it can also be put at risk with unnecessary actions such as Vietnam and Iraq. This is why I will never support wars of these kind. I hope our troops are ok but hate that we had to out them there for no reason.native wrote:
Well crafted post, Appy, but as you know, freedom isn't free and cannot be maintaned without sacrfice.
Whether or not the particular sacrifice is or is not on your list of aproved sacrifices, the value of the willingness to sacrifice and the effort to maintain the faith under extreme duress is priceless. Unfortunately, it takes thousands and thousands of such sacrifices, even though some may, in hindsight, be misdirected.
My family members who spent years in communist prison camps in SE Asia may disagree with your characterization of our efforts there.

1. Agreed. Not taking prisoners works much better.slycat wrote:Torture doesn't work that well anyway. Should be banned.

Agree....CID1990 wrote:1. Agreed. Not taking prisoners works much better.slycat wrote:Torture doesn't work that well anyway. Should be banned.
2. It is banned.

Good point. It is very hard to properly decide when and how to engage.slycat wrote:...But it can also be put at risk with unnecessary actions such as Vietnam and Iraq. This is why I will never support wars of these kind. I hope our troops are ok but hate that we had to out them there for no reason.


not happening... she'll almost certainly ride this out... the GOP will continue to try and keep the story alive... but its salience with most voters is almost nil.Appaholic wrote:Democrats back Pelosi amid waterboarding controversy
One of Pelosi's closest allies in the House, Connecticut Democrat John Larson, acknowledged to CNN that the speaker's news conference last week could have been better, but insisted there hasn't been any fallout among Democrats.
"Perhaps it wasn't one of her best press conferences. But certainly everyone in this caucus stands behind her to be the lead in our caucus. I don't know if it could have been done better or not, but our caucus is entirely behind her, " Larson said.
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05 ... pstoryview
Transalation: Of course we are backing our Speaker.....from afar......until a new Speaker emerges....


Probably so.....but hopefully it undermines her credibility with the average voter......wishful thinking I know....TwinTownBisonFan wrote:not happening... she'll almost certainly ride this out... the GOP will continue to try and keep the story alive... but its salience with most voters is almost nil.Appaholic wrote:Democrats back Pelosi amid waterboarding controversy
One of Pelosi's closest allies in the House, Connecticut Democrat John Larson, acknowledged to CNN that the speaker's news conference last week could have been better, but insisted there hasn't been any fallout among Democrats.
"Perhaps it wasn't one of her best press conferences. But certainly everyone in this caucus stands behind her to be the lead in our caucus. I don't know if it could have been done better or not, but our caucus is entirely behind her, " Larson said.
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05 ... pstoryview
Transalation: Of course we are backing our Speaker.....from afar......until a new Speaker emerges....

average voter doesn't know who she is... and many who do know... dont care.Appaholic wrote:Probably so.....but hopefully it undermines her credibility with the average voter......wishful thinking I know....TwinTownBisonFan wrote:
not happening... she'll almost certainly ride this out... the GOP will continue to try and keep the story alive... but its salience with most voters is almost nil.


...and she obviously "couldn't handle the truth" in the first place!MarkCCU wrote:SHE'S DONE! She doesn't even know the truth anymore.

Agree.......she's known where she needs to be - her district....but, as we saw with Lott, she can be removed from the Speaker's position. But, I do not have faith in either political party investigating her claims for fear of what they may uncover...TwinTownBisonFan wrote:average voter doesn't know who she is... and many who do know... dont care.Appaholic wrote:
Probably so.....but hopefully it undermines her credibility with the average voter......wishful thinking I know....
i've polled on Nancy in both 06 and 08... her name ID in the two districts i was in was something like 35% at it's highest... and most of that was among Dems and hardcore GOP
swing voters dont know her well, nor do they care...

Hey TC! Why do you think fellow Marylander Michael Steel had nice things to say about Steny this past weekend on Meet the Press?TwinTownBisonFan wrote: ...lemme clue you conks on something you aren't thinking about... but should be... you think things are tough with nancy in charge??? Steny is the 'ol boys network... Steny and Rahm are best buddies, and they approach their politics with the same vigor... you'll go from bad, to your worst nightmare with Hoyer.

And what were Trent Lott's name ID numbers in those districts when his train crashed?TwinTownBisonFan wrote:average voter doesn't know who she is... and many who do know... dont care.Appaholic wrote:
Probably so.....but hopefully it undermines her credibility with the average voter......wishful thinking I know....
i've polled on Nancy in both 06 and 08... her name ID in the two districts i was in was something like 35% at it's highest... and most of that was among Dems and hardcore GOP
swing voters dont know her well, nor do they care...


native wrote:Good point. It is very hard to properly decide when and how to engage.slycat wrote:...But it can also be put at risk with unnecessary actions such as Vietnam and Iraq. This is why I will never support wars of these kind. I hope our troops are ok but hate that we had to out them there for no reason.
However, I disagree with your conclusion on Vietnam, and it is too early to make a judgement on Iraq.
It is clear from the post war horrors against innocent civilians in Cambodia and to a lesser extent in Laos and Vietnam that the Domino Theory was valid. Before you claim that they were caused by the U.S., Ho Chi Minh murdered a few thousands of his own long before Johnson's escalation of the war.
Isolationism didn't work after WWI. Korea, where we successfully protected a relatvely free regime, can be considered a success. Korea is the closest equivalent to Vietnam.

travelinman67 wrote:And what were Trent Lott's name ID numbers in those districts when his train crashed?TwinTownBisonFan wrote:
average voter doesn't know who she is... and many who do know... dont care.
i've polled on Nancy in both 06 and 08... her name ID in the two districts i was in was something like 35% at it's highest... and most of that was among Dems and hardcore GOP
swing voters dont know her well, nor do they care...
TTBF...you WISH she stays in only because it provides party continuity and strength to the party you support.
Pelosi is the single worst House leader of the past century, yet Dems like yourself don't have the courage to step up and put her out to pasture.
Just try and imagine for a moment what the House would be like with Sten Hoyer at the helm rather than Pelosi...
...Hoyer is a dyed-in-the-wool left wing Dem, has the money connections, and has paid his dues.
Replace Pelosi with Hoyer, then offer Reid a vacation cruise package off the coast of Somalia.

Speaking of old turds...how're your knees holding up?Cap'n Cat wrote:Howzabout if'n I offer you a knuckle sandwich, you pompous old turd?travelinman67 wrote:
And what were Trent Lott's name ID numbers in those districts when his train crashed?
TTBF...you WISH she stays in only because it provides party continuity and strength to the party you support.
Pelosi is the single worst House leader of the past century, yet Dems like yourself don't have the courage to step up and put her out to pasture.
Just try and imagine for a moment what the House would be like with Sten Hoyer at the helm rather than Pelosi...
...Hoyer is a dyed-in-the-wool left wing Dem, has the money connections, and has paid his dues.
Replace Pelosi with Hoyer, then offer Reid a vacation cruise package off the coast of Somalia.

travelinman67 wrote:Speaking of old turds...how're your knees holding up?Cap'n Cat wrote:
Howzabout if'n I offer you a knuckle sandwich, you pompous old turd?

Fuck the meds. All that sh!t makes you live longer...but you'll be miserable the rest of your life with all sorts of drug interactions/side effects.Cap'n Cat wrote:I'm in terrible pain all over. My Lipitor is slowly killing me.travelinman67 wrote:
Speaking of old turds...how're your knees holding up?


Actually, the 'authorities' would have been the White House. In a way, it was the 'authorities' that briefed her on waterboarding. But you are right- if she was so opposed to waterboarding, then she should have voiced her concerns to the Bush administration. Her argument is that it would not have done any good, but that's not the point. At least she would have been on record, and then she would not be having any of these problems. IN FACT, if she had known that the waterboarding issue was going to be a hot topic today, does anyone think she WOULDN'T have protested? That is the one reason I know she is full of shit.MarkCCU wrote:WE also got in the war at the behest of the French, who true to thier style, pulled out and we stayed.
On Pelosi, she was aware of it and regardless of her capacity, she had a PROFESSIONAL, MORAL AND ETHICAL obligation to bring this to the attention of the proper authorities. She failed, lied and will go down in flames.