Just threw up laughing my ass off!!!houndawg wrote:Cap'n Cat wrote:
Man, I used to write out the 2A in jizz on your first wife's ass, T, while you were still masturbating to old Spiro Agnew films….
Go on a diet, get some dentures, comb those four hairs of yours and go back to sleep.
She must have been a history buff, she had me do the Gettysburg address, even though there was room on her ass for a lot more. I wrote backwards so she could read it in the mirror.
Right. And who do YOU think the overwhelming majority of the people I described voted for in the last two Presidential elections? And, as we all really know, D1B is wrong about none of them voting. A lower percentage of them voted than the overall percentage of the general population. But a lot of them voted.JSO is getting absolutely owned...
JohnStOnge wrote:Right. And who do YOU think the overwhelming majority of the people I described voted for in the last two Presidential elections? And, as we all really know, D1B is wrong about none of them voting. A lower percentage of them voted than the overall percentage of the general population. But a lot of them voted.JSO is getting absolutely owned...
And even among those who didn't vote, we know who the overwhelming majority of them "identify" with politically.
Sorry fellas, but if you're looking for an association between people who engage in violent behavior and proclivity for political parties any reasonable thought process is going to lead you to conclude that people who sympathize with the Democratic Party are more violent, on average, than people who vote for the Republican Party are.
And it's pretty damned obvious once you start really looking at it.
Got any stats on who black thugs/conks vote for?JohnStOnge wrote:Right. And who do YOU think the overwhelming majority of the people I described voted for in the last two Presidential elections? And, as we all really know, D1B is wrong about none of them voting. A lower percentage of them voted than the overall percentage of the general population. But a lot of them voted.JSO is getting absolutely owned...
Even among those who didn't vote, we know who the overwhelming majority of them "identify" with politically.
Sorry fellas, but if you're looking for an association between people who engage in violent behavior and proclivity for political parties any reasonable thought process is going to lead you to conclude that people who sympathize with the Democratic Party are more violent, on average, than people who vote for the Republican Party are.
And it's pretty damned obvious once you start really looking at it. Hell, just contemplate what would happen if you looked up, say, the murder rate for each voting district in the country then looked at who that voting district went for in the last Presidential election. You KNOW what you'd see if you did that. You're going to see the highest murder rate voting districts going like 90 or 95% for Obama. And you also know the 5% or 10% in those districts who did NOT vote for Obama aren't the ones causing the squalor in those communities. You know that. You really do; even if you never admit it.
Thugs don't vote. You don't see the Crips or Bloods going en masse to the polling location or hosting a fundraiser.D1B wrote:Got any stats on who black thugs/conks vote for?JohnStOnge wrote:
Right. And who do YOU think the overwhelming majority of the people I described voted for in the last two Presidential elections? And, as we all really know, D1B is wrong about none of them voting. A lower percentage of them voted than the overall percentage of the general population. But a lot of them voted.
Even among those who didn't vote, we know who the overwhelming majority of them "identify" with politically.
Sorry fellas, but if you're looking for an association between people who engage in violent behavior and proclivity for political parties any reasonable thought process is going to lead you to conclude that people who sympathize with the Democratic Party are more violent, on average, than people who vote for the Republican Party are.
And it's pretty damned obvious once you start really looking at it. Hell, just contemplate what would happen if you looked up, say, the murder rate for each voting district in the country then looked at who that voting district went for in the last Presidential election. You KNOW what you'd see if you did that. You're going to see the highest murder rate voting districts going like 90 or 95% for Obama. And you also know the 5% or 10% in those districts who did NOT vote for Obama aren't the ones causing the squalor in those communities. You know that. You really do; even if you never admit it.
Been trying to suggest this to JSO. Perhaps they're all Crips and Bloods to him.Ibanez wrote:Thugs don't vote. You don't see the Crips or Bloods going en masse to the polling location or hosting a fundraiser.D1B wrote:
Got any stats on who black thugs/conks vote for?
Huh?Ibanez wrote:
Thugs don't vote. You don't see the Crips or Bloods going en masse to the polling location or hosting a fundraiser.
I used my " Jump to Conclusions" mat.Cluck U wrote:Huh?Ibanez wrote:
Thugs don't vote. You don't see the Crips or Bloods going en masse to the polling location or hosting a fundraiser.
Got any stats to back that up?
Well, except for the felons...but they are trying to change that.
