You.houndawg wrote:compared to who?LeadBolt wrote:
So 64% of independents not approving of Obama, based upon performance rather than ideology is not so bad?
It's THAT bad!

You.houndawg wrote:compared to who?LeadBolt wrote:
So 64% of independents not approving of Obama, based upon performance rather than ideology is not so bad?

Well then maybe it's the 35% hardcore libtards, with a 4% bump for those independents who have been living under a rock for the past 6 years.Skjellyfetti wrote:Eh, his numbers with independents are about the same as his overall numbers.AZGrizFan wrote:
And, WRT is "job approval rating", does it surprise anyone that at this point the only people left supporting him are the 40% of hardcore democrats in this country? The battle is always for the middle 20% of independents and they have abandoned him in droves. His approval rating will NEVER drop much below where it is now because all that's left is the Obamabots who have swallowed the cum, fondled the balls, and lapped it up for 6 years.
36% of independents. Not great. But, certainly not as your argument suggests...


travelinman67 wrote:You.houndawg wrote:
compared to who?
It's THAT bad!

What about it.kalm wrote:I should have been more specific and said the race part. Interesting.andy7171 wrote: Serious.

Did somebody mention Bush?CID1990 wrote:not surprising that would matter to you but the knee jerk "but Bush" canards MUST be getting tiresome to youhoundawg wrote:
compared to who?
so here's a thought experiment for you:
how about compared to Bill Clinton?


Not that shocking. Just look at this forum for a good cross reference...dback, lube job, houndy, Cappy, D1B, kalm (most of the time) will defend him until their dying breath.Bronco wrote:-
Mid East is on fire...border is broken...some posters on here can't find work...and just hours after the American embassy is evacuated in Libya our failed president goes
Shocking to me that 37% still think he's a good president
In baseball 34% is hall of fame numbers....LeadBolt wrote:So 64% of independents not approving of Obama, based upon performance rather than ideology is not so bad?Skjellyfetti wrote:
Eh, his numbers with independents are about the same as his overall numbers.
36% of independents. Not great. But, certainly not as your argument suggests...

Well, you're not accounting for those with no opinion / undecided.LeadBolt wrote:So 64% of independents not approving of Obama, based upon performance rather than ideology is not so bad?Skjellyfetti wrote:
Eh, his numbers with independents are about the same as his overall numbers.
36% of independents. Not great. But, certainly not as your argument suggests...


Voted for Willie Nelson in '12.Baldy wrote:Not that shocking. Just look at this forum for a good cross reference...dback, lube job, houndy, Cappy, D1B, kalm (most of the time) will defend him until their dying breath.Bronco wrote:-
Mid East is on fire...border is broken...some posters on here can't find work...and just hours after the American embassy is evacuated in Libya our failed president goes
Shocking to me that 37% still think he's a good president![]()

Voted Johnson. A more conservative vote than most the conks on here placed.houndawg wrote:Voted for Willie Nelson in '12.Baldy wrote: Not that shocking. Just look at this forum for a good cross reference...dback, lube job, houndy, Cappy, D1B, kalm (most of the time) will defend him until their dying breath.![]()
![]()
The only person I will vote for for President for the rest of my life.



Tax and spend conks..kalm wrote:Voted Johnson. A more conservative vote than most the conks on here placed.houndawg wrote:
Voted for Willie Nelson in '12.![]()
The only person I will vote for for President for the rest of my life.

andy7171 wrote:What about it.kalm wrote:
I should have been more specific and said the race part. Interesting.
We don't have many (blacks out here, and I know a few) so I didn't realize the Obama presidency had created racial animosity.THIS is the most depressed time I've ever experienced. I rode the bus when Obama was elected. I've never seen so many happy people.
All I see in peoples faces is exhausted. I miss BSing with black folk. I like them. My experience working in warehouses and in the locker room has given me the ability to communicate without the whole racist skin color. And they appreciate a white guy addressing them like there is nothing different between us. Because we are all just people.
These days are just divisive. I have never felt this way about my fellow man. Skin color be damned.


dont start channeling klam, sh1theadhoundawg wrote:Did somebody mention Bush?CID1990 wrote:
not surprising that would matter to you but the knee jerk "but Bush" canards MUST be getting tiresome to you
so here's a thought experiment for you:
how about compared to Bill Clinton?

I'd go out on a pretty sturdy limb and say that a much smaller percentage of conks on this board voted for Romney than donks who voted for Hussein Obama.houndawg wrote:Tax and spend conks..kalm wrote:
Voted Johnson. A more conservative vote than most the conks on here placed.


AZGrizFan wrote:I'd go out on a pretty sturdy limb and say that a much smaller percentage of conks on this board voted for Romney than donks who voted for Hussein Obama.houndawg wrote:
Tax and spend conks..
You're a serious asshat.andy7171 wrote:Serious.kalm wrote:
Not sure if serious...

That's because they didn't know how to work a voting machine.AZGrizFan wrote:I'd go out on a pretty sturdy limb and say that a much smaller percentage of conks on this board voted for Romney than donks who voted for Hussein Obama.houndawg wrote:
Tax and spend conks..

I'd consider it if I hadn't already sworn a mickle oath to only vote for Willie Nelson from this day forward. I might renounce my oath and vote for Kucinich if he lets me bang his ol' lady.....[Chizzang wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
I'd go out on a pretty sturdy limb and say that a much smaller percentage of conks on this board voted for Romney than donks who voted for Hussein Obama.
I voted Jill Stein..!!!
![]()

Chizzang wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
He has injected himself into damned near every "race-based" issue/ local news story that has occurred...the above comments regarding the Trayvon Martin case, the Harvard professor incident, reacting inappropriately and saying "the police acted stupidly, then holding the ridiculous beer summit, "condemning" Donald Sterling's remarks.....he just can't help himself.
This ^![]()
and AZ is rarely right in matters such as these
My brother and I were having lunch and basically agreeing that this presidency can't get OVER fast enough
and we're both pretty damn Liberal

Wrong answer, Myron. It's because the conservatives on this board are much more willing to admit that the current system is broken and that, donk or conk, there's very little difference once they hit the White House.houndawg wrote:That's because they didn't know how to work a voting machine.AZGrizFan wrote:
I'd go out on a pretty sturdy limb and say that a much smaller percentage of conks on this board voted for Romney than donks who voted for Hussein Obama.


This is true for conservatives. Since January, 2009.AZGrizFan wrote:Wrong answer, Myron. It's because the conservatives on this board are much more willing to admit that the current system is broken and that, donk or conk, there's very little difference once they hit the White House.houndawg wrote:
That's because they didn't know how to work a voting machine.