"Federal Gov’t Sues Wisconsin Company, Says English-Language Requirement is 'Discrimination'
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), a federal agency tasked with enforcing workplace discrimination laws, is suing a private American business for firing a group of Hispanic and Asian employees over their inability to speak English at work, claiming that the English-language requirement in a U.S. business constitutes “discrimination.”
Judicial Watch reported Tuesday that the government is accusing Wisconsin Plastics, Inc. of violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on “national origin.” The government argues this includes the “linguistic characteristics of a national origin group.”
Irene Garcia, the blog editor and Spanish media liaison for Judicial Watch, called the EEOC’s accusation “ludicrous.”
“That’s ludicrous and an overreaching of government,” Garcia told CNSNews.com. “If you are a private company in the United States, you should be able to require your employees to speak English.”.....
.......But Garcia said the ability to speak English is necessary for employees of Wisconsin Plastics, Inc., but that the employees in question “were not able to speak English at any kind of level that would be considered proficient.”
“In this case some English is necessary to communicate with supervisors and stuff like that, and the EEOC just went after this private company because some employees were being marked down for not having English skills. So that doesn’t really make sense,” she said.
Garcia added that the lawsuit, filed on June 9, is just the latest in a slew of attempts by the EEOC and the Obama administration to go after American businesses for so-called “discrimination.” She cited numerous cases in which the EEOC has accused businesses of discriminating by requiring workers to speak English, running background and criminal checks, and enforcing company-wide restrictions on head coverings, including those worn by some Muslim women.
“We’ve seen some decisions that are kind of radical that we haven’t seen in the past, under Republican or Democrat administrations,” she said, claiming the EEOC under the Obama administration is “on a roll.”....."
http://m.cnsnews.com/news/article/britt ... h-language" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Require employees be able to speak English is discriminatory
- BDKJMU
- Level5

- Posts: 36370
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Require employees be able to speak English is discriminatory
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
- BDKJMU
- Level5

- Posts: 36370
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Require employees be able to speak English is discrimina
Unfu*kingbelievable. Just when you think you've seen it all.. 
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
Re: Require employees be able to speak English is discrimina
We don't have an official language but I do think since we're an English-speaking country for the most part you should learn the language. Hell, If I moved to Spain i'd learn Spanish, French if I moved to France, Jive if I moved to Detroit.BDKJMU wrote:Unfu*kingbelievable. Just when you think you've seen it all..
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69151
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Require employees be able to speak English is discrimina
Totally agree, but why did the company in this case hire them in the first place?Ibanez wrote:We don't have an official language but I do think since we're an English-speaking country for the most part you should learn the language. Hell, If I moved to Spain i'd learn Spanish, French if I moved to France, Jive if I moved to Detroit.BDKJMU wrote:Unfu*kingbelievable. Just when you think you've seen it all..
- CitadelGrad
- Level4

- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
- I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
- A.K.A.: El Cid
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Require employees be able to speak English is discrimina
Probably to meet EEO regulations.kalm wrote:Totally agree, but why did the company in this case hire them in the first place?Ibanez wrote: We don't have an official language but I do think since we're an English-speaking country for the most part you should learn the language. Hell, If I moved to Spain i'd learn Spanish, French if I moved to France, Jive if I moved to Detroit.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69151
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Require employees be able to speak English is discrimina
CitadelGrad wrote:Probably to meet EEO regulations.kalm wrote:
Totally agree, but why did the company in this case hire them in the first place?
- BlueHen86
- Supporter

- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
- I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
- A.K.A.: Duffman
- Location: Area XI
Re: Require employees be able to speak English is discrimina
Which ones?CitadelGrad wrote:Probably to meet EEO regulations.kalm wrote:
Totally agree, but why did the company in this case hire them in the first place?


