Shouldn't we pass a balanced bill amendment that requires the legislators to to keep the number of laws on the books the same? I mean, there has to be 350+ stupid laws that don't need to be there if they passed 350+.......
balanced bill amendment
-
GrizFanStuckInUtah
- Level3
- Posts: 3758
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:27 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
balanced bill amendment
While looking through some of the 350+ new laws that go into affect today here in Utah, I was thinking.....
Shouldn't we pass a balanced bill amendment that requires the legislators to to keep the number of laws on the books the same? I mean, there has to be 350+ stupid laws that don't need to be there if they passed 350+.......
Shouldn't we pass a balanced bill amendment that requires the legislators to to keep the number of laws on the books the same? I mean, there has to be 350+ stupid laws that don't need to be there if they passed 350+.......
-Go Griz!
-Class of '97
-Thank you to all our Veterans.
-Class of '97
-Thank you to all our Veterans.
-
kalm
- Supporter
- Posts: 69151
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: balanced bill amendment
I totally agree with this.GrizFanStuckInUtah wrote:While looking through some of the 350+ new laws that go into affect today here in Utah, I was thinking.....
Shouldn't we pass a balanced bill amendment that requires the legislators to to keep the number of laws on the books the same? I mean, there has to be 350+ stupid laws that don't need to be there if they passed 350+.......
-
Ivytalk
- Supporter
- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: balanced bill amendment
I contend that the objective should be a deficit bill amendment. For every pig-finding-an-acorn moment when a legislature passes a "good" bill, at least two worthless and/or logrolling, pork-filled laws should be repealed.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.