Well, I certainly agree that citizenship for their children is a legit motivation that I didn't mention... though, do agree completely with.CID1990 wrote:Actually, yes they are.Skjellyfetti wrote:
Contrary to popular belief, Mexicans aren't risking their lives walking across the desert for days to take advantage of US welfare.
The ability to send remesas home is one part of the equation, but the allure of "residencia" and citizenship for their children is at the very least an equal player. We have MANY citizens and LPRs who live in Mexico, El Salvador and Guatemala who have no intention of ever living in the US or becoming actual Americans, because they can enjoy the low cost of living at home while enjoying the benefits of citizenship in the form of various social programs.
However, I do not see birthright citizenship as welfare... nor do I believe the motivation for Mexicans, Salvadorans, etc. for their children to be US citizens is so that they can take advantage of welfare -- it's so that they will have access to opportunities that they would not have in their own country.
As a middle class grows in Mexico and opportunities are available to them, it will be less of a motivation, imo.
No. But, it's not at all surprising to me.CID1990 wrote:BTW- did you know that more than 20% of the entire Salvadoran economy is based on remittances from the US, and that a full 1/3 of the entire Salvadoran population actually resides in the US?
I'm not as familiar with TPS -- but, I've seen similar things with temporary worker programs in North Carolina. It's well-intentioned... and is still better than illegal immigration. Workers exploit the system, employers exploit the system, etc. It's a mess, but still an improvement over the status quo.CID1990 wrote:One day I will talk about TPS- temporary protected status- if anyone wants to be enlightened about how good intentions ALWAYS wind up being exploited by not only the beneficiaries but also the politicians.











