http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2012/12/2 ... e-workers/
****ing unbelievable.




Say what?Pwns wrote:Don't see how you can argue sex discrimination here...

If she had been an unattractive female she would not have lost her job. It's not discrimination based on sex, it is discrimination based on looks.travelinman67 wrote:Say what?Pwns wrote:Don't see how you can argue sex discrimination here...
But for her gender, she wouldn't have lost her job.
Had she been an "irresistable male", her employer wouldn't have terminated her.
What part of this is ambiguous?

But if the employer has a "thing" for flat-chested, heavily-acne'd, overweight, greasy skinned, high-pitch voiced women, under your criteria, this woman's appearance makes her termination justifiable?Pwns wrote:If she had been an unattractive female she would not have lost her job. It's not discrimination based on sex, it is discrimination based on looks.travelinman67 wrote:
Say what?
But for her gender, she wouldn't have lost her job.
Had she been an "irresistable male", her employer wouldn't have terminated her.
What part of this is ambiguous?

Aha! The Papal Horndog appeareth!JoltinJoe wrote:

Thanks, Vid! I think that gal is semi hot.Vidav wrote:




SeattleGriz wrote:Like I posted on FB. This is exactly why my wife stays at home. Too hot. 5'11", Russian heritage. I don't need to say anymore.

No, but it has been a while since you posted any pics.SeattleGriz wrote:Like I posted on FB. This is exactly why my wife stays at home. Too hot. 5'11", Russian heritage. I don't need to say anymore.


This.Pwns wrote:Don't see how you can argue sex discrimination here, and there is no legal protections for discrimination based on looks, so I don't see the case you can make here.
She'll be all right, though. She is a young and attractive female - no one has it easier in life.

Lithuanian actually. Cleets tried to hump her leg. Had to shake a can of pennies at him to scare him off.Vidav wrote:SeattleGriz wrote:Like I posted on FB. This is exactly why my wife stays at home. Too hot. 5'11", Russian heritage. I don't need to say anymore.


What if the employer is gay?travelinman67 wrote:But if the employer has a "thing" for flat-chested, heavily-acne'd, overweight, greasy skinned, high-pitch voiced women, under your criteria, this woman's appearance makes her termination justifiable?Pwns wrote:
If she had been an unattractive female she would not have lost her job. It's not discrimination based on sex, it is discrimination based on looks.
Can an employer now say, "Due to your recent addition of full-body tattoos, fifty facial piercings, and refusal to shave your pits, even though your work is exemplary and without blemish, I'm firing your for cause because I'm sexually aroused by trashy, bohemian women." ?
This would make finding suitable assistants for Cappy virtually impossible.

