Consistencydbackjon wrote:No. Why would it?
dbackjon wrote:History has shown that separate but "equal" is never equal.

Consistencydbackjon wrote:No. Why would it?
dbackjon wrote:History has shown that separate but "equal" is never equal.


89Hen wrote:Consistencydbackjon wrote:No. Why would it?dbackjon wrote:History has shown that separate but "equal" is never equal.

I'm not the only one.dbackjon wrote:89Hen wrote: Consistency
Nope - you are mixing religious with civil.

