Epstein Arrested

[kalm]

30 years? Epstein was last arrested in 2019. Maxwell was convicted in 2021. Besides, you think the time frame should somehow absolve all guilt? You’re literally defending pedophilia here.

The redactions were done by TRUMP’S DOJ and overseen by Bondi and Patel. Maybe they should be asked why there were so many fuck ups and obvious protection of potential perpetrators?

Your level of ignorance comes more into focus with every post.

2026
-
1996
=
30 years

Klamdami so dummy

I didn’t deny when he started. I just clearly questioned the pertinence. You as usual, avoid the questions and continue to post your idiocy. I’m beginning to think you’re a masochist.

[Caribbean Hen]

2026
-
1996
=
30 years

Klamdami so dummy

I didn’t deny when he started. I just clearly questioned the pertinence. You as usual, avoid the questions and continue to post your idiocy. I’m beginning to think you’re a masochist.

You had no clue when Epstein was first reported to law enforcement did you

[kalm]

I didn’t deny when he started. I just clearly questioned the pertinence. You as usual, avoid the questions and continue to post your idiocy. I’m beginning to think you’re a masochist.

You had no clue when Epstein was first reported to law enforcement did you

Of course I did, you silly little ignorant man.
There numerous pics of the Jeff and Donnie from the early 90’s. Jeff’s long history ain’t exactly a secret.

You’re running out of straws to grasp at. Too bad you’re not honest enough to admit ignorance.

[Caribbean Hen]

“I’ve admitted” means it happened in the past, that means when I typed that it was true

But since you and Klamdami didn’t offer up any names, I took a look for myself

I’m honored that Chang and Eng are in agreement on the witch hunt of CH

You still haven’t read up on it yet have you? At least from a journalistic source.

No one thinks this is a witch hunt. And BTW it was going on during the first Trump presidency and at least Maxwell was convicted around that time. So it ain’t exactly the old news you want it to be.

But since you think you understand it, why were 1000’s of FBI agents tasked with refs ring the names of the perpetrators? Why all of the resistance to an investigation?

My God son, your instincts are so bad

I was talking about you Chang, and your hermano Eng and your dumb little dog You’re so emotionally hysterical
you can’t even grasp a simple statement.

Here is a clue, The witch-hunt comment was about the reaction to myself asking a simple question. There are several examples of you leaving a mess on this board over the past several days, but I don’t have time to clean it all up.

I would love to see the evidence that you have been unable to produce. You’re so comfortably dumb in your own misplaced derangement that you don’t think I wanna see arrests? Of course I do

When I ask the question …

who should be arrested and for what?

I was actually hoping you, they all knowing Klamdami and self proclaimed expert on the Epstein files, would produce some names and some evidence, specifically some evidence that hasn’t already been debunked. Don’t forget the age of the victim and where did these crimes occur? Not all of these crimes occurred on U.S. territory like Epstein Island”

[kalm]

You still haven’t read up on it yet have you? At least from a journalistic source.

No one thinks this is a witch hunt. And BTW it was going on during the first Trump presidency and at least Maxwell was convicted around that time. So it ain’t exactly the old news you want it to be.

But since you think you understand it, why were 1000’s of FBI agents tasked with refs ring the names of the perpetrators? Why all of the resistance to an investigation?

My God son, your instincts are so bad

I was talking about you Chang, and your hermano Eng and your dumb little dog You’re so emotionally hysterical
you can’t even grasp a simple statement.

Here is a clue, The witch-hunt comment was about the reaction to myself asking a simple question. There are several examples of you leaving a mess on this board over the past several days, but I don’t have time to clean it all up.

I would love to see the evidence that you have been unable to produce. You’re so comfortably dumb in your own misplaced derangement that you don’t think I wanna see arrests? Of course I do

When I ask the question …

who should be arrested and for what?

I was actually hoping you, they all knowing Klamdami and self proclaimed expert on the Epstein files, would produce some names and some evidence, specifically some evidence that hasn’t already been debunked. Don’t forget the age of the victim and where did these crimes occur? Not all of these crimes occurred on U.S. territory like Epstein Island”

Good morning, CH!

You’re not a valuable enough target for a witch hunt. It’s obvious you were ignorantly attempting to describe the Epstein investigations as the with hunt. The evidence (as you yourself mentioned, 3 million docs) is everywhere. Trump and his minions like Bondi have been trying to cover it up - stalling, redactions to prevent reputational harm to possible perpetrators of child rape and abuse while victims names go unredacted, failure to answer simple yes or no questions. British royalty and high ranking government officials of multiple counties have already gone down over this. That doesn’t happen without strong evidence.

There are thousands of articles on the topic. Go find a few if you’d like to have an honest discussion.

[Caribbean Hen]

My God son, your instincts are so bad

I was talking about you Chang, and your hermano Eng and your dumb little dog You’re so emotionally hysterical
you can’t even grasp a simple statement.

Here is a clue, The witch-hunt comment was about the reaction to myself asking a simple question. There are several examples of you leaving a mess on this board over the past several days, but I don’t have time to clean it all up.

I would love to see the evidence that you have been unable to produce. You’re so comfortably dumb in your own misplaced derangement that you don’t think I wanna see arrests? Of course I do

When I ask the question …

who should be arrested and for what?

I was actually hoping you, they all knowing Klamdami and self proclaimed expert on the Epstein files, would produce some names and some evidence, specifically some evidence that hasn’t already been debunked. Don’t forget the age of the victim and where did these crimes occur? Not all of these crimes occurred on U.S. territory like Epstein Island”

Good morning, CH!

You’re not a valuable enough target for a witch hunt. It’s obvious you were ignorantly attempting to describe the Epstein investigations as the with hunt. The evidence (as you yourself mentioned, 3 million docs) is everywhere. Trump and his minions like Bondi have been trying to cover it up - stalling, redactions to prevent reputational harm to possible perpetrators of child rape and abuse while victims names go unredacted, failure to answer simple yes or no questions. British royalty and high ranking government officials of multiple counties have already gone down over this. That doesn’t happen without strong evidence.

There are thousands of articles on the topic. Go find a few if you’d like to have an honest discussion.

The past few days proves otherwise and only for asking a question

Democrats begged for all the names and then complained when some names weren’t redacted…

And if the DOJ is still investigating certain individuals, that would hamper the release of some of the files

Bottom line: no matter what the DOJ does, you are going to complain and shed pools of tears crying for the day Donny is lead away in cuffs

[kalm]

Good morning, CH!

You’re not a valuable enough target for a witch hunt. It’s obvious you were ignorantly attempting to describe the Epstein investigations as the with hunt. The evidence (as you yourself mentioned, 3 million docs) is everywhere. Trump and his minions like Bondi have been trying to cover it up - stalling, redactions to prevent reputational harm to possible perpetrators of child rape and abuse while victims names go unredacted, failure to answer simple yes or no questions. British royalty and high ranking government officials of multiple counties have already gone down over this. That doesn’t happen without strong evidence.

There are thousands of articles on the topic. Go find a few if you’d like to have an honest discussion.

The past few days proves otherwise and only for asking a question

Democrats begged for all the names and then complained when some names weren’t redacted…

And if the DOJ is still investigating certain individuals, that would hamper the release of some of the files

Bottom line: no matter what the DOJ does, you are going to complain and shed pools of tears crying for the day Donny is lead away in cuffs

That’s not what a witch hunt is you attention whore. That’s simply amazement over your lack of reason and facts.

[UNI88]

Good morning, CH!

You’re not a valuable enough target for a witch hunt. It’s obvious you were ignorantly attempting to describe the Epstein investigations as the with hunt. The evidence (as you yourself mentioned, 3 million docs) is everywhere. Trump and his minions like Bondi have been trying to cover it up - stalling, redactions to prevent reputational harm to possible perpetrators of child rape and abuse while victims names go unredacted, failure to answer simple yes or no questions. British royalty and high ranking government officials of multiple counties have already gone down over this. That doesn’t happen without strong evidence.

There are thousands of articles on the topic. Go find a few if you’d like to have an honest discussion.

The past few days proves otherwise and only for asking a question

Democrats begged for all the names and then complained when some names weren’t redacted…

And if the DOJ is still investigating certain individuals, that would hamper the release of some of the files

Bottom line: no matter what the DOJ does, you are going to complain and shed pools of tears crying for the day Donny is lead away in cuffs

The Epstein Files Transparency Act:

• Specifically requires the DoJ to release all unclassified epstein-related files.
• DoJ is permitted to withhold victims' information which is inline with DoJ policy and federal law protecting sexual assault victims’ names and identifying information.
• DoJ is also permitted to withhold material that would jeopardize ongoing law-enforcement investigations, certain privileged or classified information, or information subject to other legal protections like grand jury secrecy.
• The DoJ is NOT allowed to withhold or redact information because it might be embarrassing or harm the reputation of any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.

Do you really think that Les Wexner, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, etc. are the subjects of ongoing law enforcement investigations? Or is it more likely that their names were originally redacted because "it might be embarrassing or harm their reputation"?

People (not just Democrats) are asking the DoJ to follow the law and their own policies. Why is that a problem for you?

[BDKJMU]

Massie too, because he did the same thing.

[UNI88]

Massie too, because he did the same thing.

Didn't he say the names on floor of the House? If yes, he has immunity under the Speech or Debate Clause of Article 1 of the Constitution. He can hide behind that like trump hides behind the immunity for official acts that SCOTUS gave him.

[kalm]

Massie too, because he did the same thing.

Didn't he say the names on floor of the House? If yes, he has immunity under the Speech or Debate Clause of Article 1 of the Constitution. He can hide behind that like trump hides behind the immunity for official acts that SCOTUS gave him.

Gunther Eagleman is one of MAGA’s brightest too.

[kalm]

Mic drop.

[houndawg]

Mic drop.

just when they're getting to the good stuff!

[houndawg]

Good morning, CH!

You’re not a valuable enough target for a witch hunt. It’s obvious you were ignorantly attempting to describe the Epstein investigations as the with hunt. The evidence (as you yourself mentioned, 3 million docs) is everywhere. Trump and his minions like Bondi have been trying to cover it up - stalling, redactions to prevent reputational harm to possible perpetrators of child rape and abuse while victims names go unredacted, failure to answer simple yes or no questions. British royalty and high ranking government officials of multiple counties have already gone down over this. That doesn’t happen without strong evidence.

There are thousands of articles on the topic. Go find a few if you’d like to have an honest discussion.

The past few days proves otherwise and only for asking a question

Democrats begged for all the names and then complained when some names weren’t redacted…

And if the DOJ is still investigating certain individuals, that would hamper the release of some of the files

Bottom line: no matter what the DOJ does, you are going to complain and shed pools of tears crying for the day Donny is lead away in cuffs

....sometimes you just need to take the L and retire to lick your wounds, Carribean Hump, instead of manuevering yourself into defending child fuckers....not a good look for you...

[Caribbean Hen]

The past few days proves otherwise and only for asking a question

Democrats begged for all the names and then complained when some names weren’t redacted…

And if the DOJ is still investigating certain individuals, that would hamper the release of some of the files

Bottom line: no matter what the DOJ does, you are going to complain and shed pools of tears crying for the day Donny is lead away in cuffs

....sometimes you just need to take the L and retire to lick your wounds, Carribean Hump, instead of manuevering yourself into defending child fuckers....not a good look for you...

Show us the evidence that could possibly lead to a conviction is all I’m saying ….. but with Trump, we have already seen you don’t really need any evidence. Not even the vindictive Joey Rotten tried to prosecute Trump for the Epstein files. Not a good look

[Skjellyfetti]

LONDON (AP) — Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the former British prince who was stripped of his royal titles because of his links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, was arrested Thursday on suspicion of misconduct in public office.

While Andrew has consistently denied any wrongdoing in connection with his friendship with Epstein, concerns about Mountbatten-Windsor’s links to the late financier have dogged the royal family for more than a decade. But the arrest of a brother of a monarch was an extraordinary development with no precedent in modern times that will no doubt put more pressure on the crown.

After the arrest, King Charles III said that the law must take its course in the investigation, and he sought to reassure the British public that he would continue to serve them.

https://apnews.com/article/britain-epst ... 4ee3f3583d

[Caribbean Hen]

LONDON (AP) — Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the former British prince who was stripped of his royal titles because of his links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, was arrested Thursday on suspicion of misconduct in public office.

While Andrew has consistently denied any wrongdoing in connection with his friendship with Epstein, concerns about Mountbatten-Windsor’s links to the late financier have dogged the royal family for more than a decade. But the arrest of a brother of a monarch was an extraordinary development with no precedent in modern times that will no doubt put more pressure on the crown.

After the arrest, King Charles III said that the law must take its course in the investigation, and he sought to reassure the British public that he would continue to serve them.

https://apnews.com/article/britain-epst ... 4ee3f3583d

Ex-Prince Andrew is the first British royal arrested in 400 years — and it turned out very badly for the last one

[dal4018]

https://apnews.com/article/britain-epst ... 4ee3f3583d

Ex-Prince Andrew is the first British royal arrested in 400 years — and it turned out very badly for the last one

It's about Damm Time that So-called Royal Family got called out they are glorified criminals with huge bank accounts.And now others are starting to get caught with their hands in the perverbial cookie jar!!!!!

[dal4018]

I just saw something on YouTube that Epstein tried to get his claws into DENZEL WASHINGTON but he was smart to stay away from him.

[Caribbean Hen]

Ex-Prince Andrew is the first British royal arrested in 400 years — and it turned out very badly for the last one

It's about Damm Time that So-called Royal Family got called out they are glorified criminals with huge bank accounts.And now others are starting to get caught with their hands in the perverbial cookie jar!!!!!

Andrew was arrested for mishandling of sensitive UK government information

I think his victim agreed to a monetary settlement to keep her mouth shut aka Royal Hush money

[kalm]

30 years? Epstein was last arrested in 2019. Maxwell was convicted in 2021. Besides, you think the time frame should somehow absolve all guilt? You’re literally defending pedophilia here.

The redactions were done by TRUMP’S DOJ and overseen by Bondi and Patel. Maybe they should be asked why there were so many fuck ups and obvious protection of potential perpetrators?

Your level of ignorance comes more into focus with every post.

2026
-
1996
=
30 years

Klamdami so dummy

Which has what to do with what we’re talking about?

What’s winning point do you think you’re making here?

Time for CH to take a direct question and……..

[Caribbean Hen]

2026
-
1996
=
30 years

Klamdami so dummy

Which has what to do with what we’re talking about?

What’s winning point do you think you’re making here?

Time for CH to take a direct question and……..

Dude seriously

Have a cup of coffee and maybe a walk

[UNI88]

2026
-
1996
=
30 years

Klamdami so dummy

Which has what to do with what we’re talking about?

What’s winning point do you think you’re making here?

Time for CH to take a direct question and……..

CH's Tactical MO:
1) Deflect, duck, doge ...
2) Dig up an older post from the same thread so that a post critical of and/or mocking trump is not the last post on the thread.
3) Post some garbage that he picked up in a MAQA yahoo echo chamber.
4) Post frequently without linking to the referenced article/quote.

What tactics am I missing?

CH isn't the only MAQA yahoo doing these things, they must be part of the MAQA yahoo playbook.

[kalm]

Which has what to do with what we’re talking about?

What’s winning point do you think you’re making here?

Time for CH to take a direct question and……..

CH's Tactical MO:
1) Deflect, duck, doge ...
2) Dig up an older post from the same thread so that a post critical of and/or mocking trump is not the last post on the thread.
3) Post some garbage that he picked up in a MAQA yahoo echo chamber.
4) Post frequently without linking to the referenced article/quote.

What tactics am I missing?

CH isn't the only MAQA yahoo doing these things, they must be part of the MAQA yahoo playbook.

Fair diagnosis. I’ll add:

5). When cornered by reason, pretend it’s the other who doesn’t understand.

[UNI88]

CH's Tactical MO:
1) Deflect, duck, doge ...
2) Dig up an older post from the same thread so that a post critical of and/or mocking trump is not the last post on the thread.
3) Post some garbage that he picked up in a MAQA yahoo echo chamber.
4) Post frequently without linking to the referenced article/quote.

What tactics am I missing?

CH isn't the only MAQA yahoo doing these things, they must be part of the MAQA yahoo playbook.

Fair diagnosis. I’ll add:

5). When cornered by reason, pretend it’s the other who doesn’t understand.

6) Post shallow tommy sowell quotes as if they answer every question and end all debates.