Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Political discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7343
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by Pwns »

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/spe ... mo-stance/

It's about time. I was beginning to think the science squad only cared about creationism in schools and not stuff that actually affects public health. :nod:
Scientific and regulatory agencies around the world have repeatedly and consistently found crops and foods improved through biotechnology to be as safe as, if not safer than those derived from any other method of production. There has never been a single confirmed case of a negative health outcome for humans or animals from their consumption. Their environmental impacts have been shown repeatedly to be less damaging to the environment, and a boon to global biodiversity.

Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest impact on the poorest people in Africa and Southeast Asia.

The World Health Organization estimates that 250 million people, suffer from VAD, including 40 percent of the children under five in the developing world. Based on UNICEF statistics, a total of one to two million preventable deaths occur annually as a result of VAD, because it compromises the immune system, putting babies and children at great risk. VAD itself is the leading cause of childhood blindness globally affecting 250,000 - 500,000 children each year. Half die within 12 months of losing their eyesight.
Envirowhacko death cult. :ohno:
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 67788
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by kalm »

Pwns wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/spe ... mo-stance/

It's about time. I was beginning to think the science squad only cared about creationism in schools and not stuff that actually affects public health. :nod:
Scientific and regulatory agencies around the world have repeatedly and consistently found crops and foods improved through biotechnology to be as safe as, if not safer than those derived from any other method of production. There has never been a single confirmed case of a negative health outcome for humans or animals from their consumption. Their environmental impacts have been shown repeatedly to be less damaging to the environment, and a boon to global biodiversity.

Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest impact on the poorest people in Africa and Southeast Asia.

The World Health Organization estimates that 250 million people, suffer from VAD, including 40 percent of the children under five in the developing world. Based on UNICEF statistics, a total of one to two million preventable deaths occur annually as a result of VAD, because it compromises the immune system, putting babies and children at great risk. VAD itself is the leading cause of childhood blindness globally affecting 250,000 - 500,000 children each year. Half die within 12 months of losing their eyesight.
Envirowhacko death cult. :ohno:
How is biogenetically modified corn good for biodiversity and less damaging to the environment? :suspicious:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7343
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by Pwns »

kalm wrote: How is biogenetically modified corn good for biodiversity and less damaging to the environment? :suspicious:
Because scientific consensus you conk, science-denying philistine. :ohno:




( :lol: )

But seriously, how is introducing something new into a corn's gene pool bad for biodiversity? Isn't that pretty much increasing biodiversity?
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by Ibanez »

So is there is no correlation between the rise of obesity and the introduction of genetically modified foods?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 67788
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by kalm »

Pwns wrote:
kalm wrote: How is biogenetically modified corn good for biodiversity and less damaging to the environment? :suspicious:
Because scientific consensus you conk, science-denying philistine. :ohno:




( :lol: )

But seriously, how is introducing something new into a corn's gene pool bad for biodiversity? Isn't that pretty much increasing biodiversity?
So an Iowa field is more biodiverse than 100 years ago? Are there more species of corn being raised today? How is the environment better?
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7343
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by Pwns »

Ibanez wrote:So is there is no correlation between the rise of obesity and the introduction of genetically modified foods?
There probably is, just like you could probably draw a correlation between percent of Americans identifying as non-religious and obesity.

I don't know of any GMO foods where the spliced gene increases the energy content of the food. The one food that's had a lot of controversy around it is the golden rice (basically rice with a beta carotene gene added to it). Vitamin A doesn't really have any energy content so it's not plausible that it could be responsible for obesity.
Last edited by Pwns on Fri Jul 01, 2016 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7343
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by Pwns »

kalm wrote: But seriously, how is introducing something new into a corn's gene pool bad for biodiversity? Isn't that pretty much increasing biodiversity?

So an Iowa field is more biodiverse than 100 years ago? Are there more species of corn being raised today? How is the environment better?
Why does the field itself need to have biodiversity? We've been doing selective breeding on plants and animals since forever. How is that selective breeding on such a small percentage of species in the world going to threaten diversity?
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by grizzaholic »

Greenpeace is a terrorist organization.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19120
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by GannonFan »

Ibanez wrote:So is there is no correlation between the rise of obesity and the introduction of genetically modified foods?
Well, the same correlation exists between the rise of obesity and the introduction of television and computers and vastly more sedentary jobs. But yes, let's link it to GMO instead. Oh, and soda. :coffee:
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by Ibanez »

GannonFan wrote:
Ibanez wrote:So is there is no correlation between the rise of obesity and the introduction of genetically modified foods?
Well, the same correlation exists between the rise of obesity and the introduction of television and computers and vastly more sedentary jobs. But yes, let's link it to GMO instead. Oh, and soda. :coffee:
I wasn't dismissing the idea. I was asking a question. Of course, there's a lot more SODA today than there probably was 60 years ago.

Spoiler: show
SODA - Sittin On Dat Ass
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18758
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: RE: Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by SeattleGriz »

Pwns wrote:
kalm wrote: How is biogenetically modified corn good for biodiversity and less damaging to the environment? :suspicious:
Because scientific consensus you conk, science-denying philistine. :ohno:




( Image )

But seriously, how is introducing something new into a corn's gene pool bad for biodiversity? Isn't that pretty much increasing biodiversity?
Horizontal gene transfer to your microbiome, which then affects them in a negative way, which lead to inflammation issues.

Only one study has been done on this thought and it showed (the horizontal gene transfer part) to happen.

But the bigger issue is they spray GMO foods with glyphosate and their accompanying surfactants and that was recently categorized as a probable carcinogen, although that is being battled as well.

A European group recently demonstrated glyphosate is in human bodies in greater concentration than what is allowed in water. Glyphosate wrecks your microbiome, which then causes a multitude of issues including the above referenced inflammatory issues.
Last edited by SeattleGriz on Fri Jul 01, 2016 12:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 67788
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by kalm »

Pwns wrote:
Ibanez wrote:So is there is no correlation between the rise of obesity and the introduction of genetically modified foods?
There probably is, just like you could probably draw a correlation between percent of Americans identifying as non-religious and obesity.

I don't know of any GMO foods where the spliced gene increases the energy content of the food. The one food that's had a lot of controversy around it is the golden rice (basically rice with a beta carotene gene added to it). Vitamin A doesn't really have any energy content so it's not plausible that it could be responsible for obesity.
12 species of plants represent 75% of our food supply.

Is biodiversity as evil as cultural diversity? :twisted:

Is monoculture good for the environment?
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19504
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: RE: Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by SDHornet »

SeattleGriz wrote:
Pwns wrote:
Because scientific consensus you conk, science-denying philistine. :ohno:




( Image )

But seriously, how is introducing something new into a corn's gene pool bad for biodiversity? Isn't that pretty much increasing biodiversity?
Horizontal gene transfer to your microbiome, which then affects them in a negative way, which lead to inflammation issues.

Only one study has been done on this thought and it showed (the horizontal gene transfer part) to happen.

But the bigger issue is they spray GMO foods with glyphosate and their accompanying surfactants and that was recently categorized as a probable carcinogen, although that is being battled as well.

A European group recently demonstrated glyphosate is in human bodies in greater concentration than what is allowed in water. Glyphosate wrecks your microbiome, which then causes a multitude of issues including the above referenced inflammatory issues.
Nerd alert, nerd alert, nerd alert!!!!
;)

Had the folks in town a few weeks ago and I took them to one of the few tourist traps around. While there, I had an obese hippie ask me, "So are you ready to help save the planet?".
I looked down and saw he had a big greenpeace shirt on. I told him I was good and walked off in laughter. :lol:
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18758
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by SeattleGriz »

SDHornet wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote: Horizontal gene transfer to your microbiome, which then affects them in a negative way, which lead to inflammation issues.

Only one study has been done on this thought and it showed (the horizontal gene transfer part) to happen.

But the bigger issue is they spray GMO foods with glyphosate and their accompanying surfactants and that was recently categorized as a probable carcinogen, although that is being battled as well.

A European group recently demonstrated glyphosate is in human bodies in greater concentration than what is allowed in water. Glyphosate wrecks your microbiome, which then causes a multitude of issues including the above referenced inflammatory issues.
Nerd alert, nerd alert, nerd alert!!!!
;)

Had the folks in town a few weeks ago and I took them to one of the few tourist traps around. While there, I had an obese hippie ask me, "So are you ready to help save the planet?".
I looked down and saw he had a big greenpeace shirt on. I told him I was good and walked off in laughter. :lol:
I'm closer to a dork!
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38528
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by CAA Flagship »

grizzaholic wrote:Greenpeace is a terrorist organization.
So is Iowa. What's your point?
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38528
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by CAA Flagship »

SeattleGriz wrote:
SDHornet wrote: Nerd alert, nerd alert, nerd alert!!!!
;)

Had the folks in town a few weeks ago and I took them to one of the few tourist traps around. While there, I had an obese hippie ask me, "So are you ready to help save the planet?".
I looked down and saw he had a big greenpeace shirt on. I told him I was good and walked off in laughter. :lol:
I'm closer to a dork!
No. kalm may be in the same state, but he's not close to you at all.
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by YoUDeeMan »

kalm wrote:
Is biodiversity as evil as cultural diversity? :twisted:

Is monoculture good for the environment?
Interesting questions.

We seem to be stomping out true diversity and hoping that everyone blends into one happy melting pot. Will we become, as a species, one bland stew?

I don't like to have my meals served up in a blender.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
Bisonoline
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 10:03 pm
I am a fan of: North Dakota State
A.K.A.: The Bison
Location: MN

Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by Bisonoline »

Pwns wrote:
kalm wrote: But seriously, how is introducing something new into a corn's gene pool bad for biodiversity? Isn't that pretty much increasing biodiversity?

So an Iowa field is more biodiverse than 100 years ago? Are there more species of corn being raised today? How is the environment better?
Why does the field itself need to have biodiversity? We've been doing selective breeding on plants and animals since forever. How is that selective breeding on such a small percentage of species in the world going to threaten diversity?
Didnt the ancient Egyptians modify wheat and or corn?
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 67788
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Greenpeace rebuked by Nobel Laureates

Post by kalm »

CAA Flagship wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote: I'm closer to a dork!
No. kalm may be in the same state, but he's not close to you at all.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Post Reply