AZGrizFan wrote:JohnStOnge wrote:Why do you Trump guys continue to suck up misinformation as you do? Like that Investors Business Daily editorial I just commented on. This is something I've wondered about since the beginning of the Trump candidacy. It's like when Trump became a candidate a bunch of people on the "right" decided to just suspend their critical thinking skills in order to justify supporting him. Why do you do that?
Look, I will be the first to say that many on the left have been suspending their critical thinking skills for many decades. But why are YOU doing it?
Says the guy who voted for a person who allowed American citizens to be killed in Benghazi, then had her lackeys lie about it for weeks until the elections were over, then went in front of congress and asked “What difference, at this point, does it make?” A person who lied about landing in Bosnia “under fire”. A person who claims to be a champion of women’s rights, but stayed with her rapist husband and bashed all 30-40 of his victims because she knew riding his coattails was the best path to power. A bitch who knowingly violated law by having a separate server for her email, and then when discovered accidentally “lost” 30,000 emails. Yeah, nothing suspicious about that.
She could have run against Satan himself after that and there’s no **** WAY she would have ever gotten my vote. EVER.
If you can’t see that YOU have abandoned YOUR critical thinking skills in your tireless defense of that bitch, then there’s really no helping you at this point.
It's not a matter of defending Clinton. If you'd have asked me two years before the 2016 Presidential Election if there was ANY way I'd want her to be President I'd have been very emphatic in saying "No."
But that was before I knew that the Republicans were going to come up with an alternative that is worse. For all of Clinton's faults, she was never the threat to corrupt our system that Trump is. And, as dishonest as she is, she was never as dishonest as Trump is.
He's worse.
Otherwise: You say she "...knowingly violated the law by having a separate server for her e mails." Someone way more qualified than either you or I to comment on whether or not she violated the law decided that she did not violate the law. And, as I wrote earlier, there is nothing to stop the current Justice Department from charging her with violating the law if they think she did.
That's not some desire to defend her. If she was charged, tried, and convicted of violating the law I'd say she violated the law. But, after a long investigation, she wasn't even charged. And I haven't heard anything about her being charged after the Administration changed. Why is that the case if it was just Comey being way off target and it's SO clear that she violated the law?