She's righteous if you believe her words are consistent with her intentions (I don't) just like Trump and Boobs are righteous if you believe their words are consistent with their intentions (I don't). People tend to think someone or something is righteous based on their own beliefs and biases. Righteousness is subjective. The crusaders thought they were righteous. The colonists thought they were righteous. Jerry Falwell Jr. thought he was righteous. Waters thinks she's righteous. History might tell a different story.kalm wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 4:33 pmIt is more righteous IMO, but she is also less of a threat with a much smaller following.UNI88 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 3:46 pm
I can't stand Waters, Pelosi, Boobs or Trump. What Waters is saying now (and what's she's said in the past) isn't that different from what Boobs and Trump said in the lead-up to January 6. She isn't being held accountable because people perceive her cause to be righteous.
If instigating a riot is cause for impeachment/calls to resign for Trump and Boobs than it should for Waters as well. Consistency is important and giving her a pass is a sign of liberal privilege.