Ibanez wrote:Cluck U wrote:
Dude had a right to carry (some may not like it, but he had the right to do so).
Dude had a right to walk around (some may not like it but he had the right to do so).
Dude had a right to look for a potential perp (some may not like it, but he had the right to do so).
Dude got attacked and beaten by a punk.
Dude got set up and demonized by the MSM.
Dude was threatened by hordes of the uneducated, bottom dwellers of society.
Dude was made a part of a racist agenda.
Of course he is the victim.
What part of all that is untrue?
Shouldn't it say he "has" the right. I mean, they weren't taken away were they?
- Spoiler: show
- Just be a dick for you being a dick to me in another thread. Grammar Nazis UNITE!

If you were writing a book about the incident, you would use, "had", because the incident we are referring to was in the past. He still, "has" those rights...but he is being made a victim due to the incidents in the past...thus, the, "had" reference. Freakin' Nazi!
BTW, I am writing a book in order to profit from this supposed tragedy. It will be called, "Pop a Cap in a Punk...Regardless of Color".
Of course, the movie will include the songs, "Jump Around", "The Night Chicago Died" (a re-worked version by NWA that foCUSSes on black-on-black urban crime), and, "Another One bites the Dust". Special effects will include Chameleon Man, who will jump people, sucker punch them, and rob them of their jewelry. He will change colors during mug shots and TV interviews in order to confuse the public. The President will have a cameo where he says, "Chameleon Man looks like my son...because I am black...no wait...half black...no wait, he looks like my half white part...and you know I'd hit a white girl if Bertha Butt, I mean, Michelle, would let me...and WTF color is that guy anyway?"
Get in on the funding now...it is sure to be a great investment.
