Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

JohnStOnge · Post by **JohnStOnge** » Wed Aug 31, 2011 5:50 pm

Tell you what, D: Why don't we all agree to support ending anything any of us would deem as "welfare," corporate or otherwise. With one caveat.

And the caveat is that allowing people to keep their own money is not "welfare." So I'm not talking about "tax breaks."

D1B · Post by **D1B** » Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:26 pm

JohnStOnge wrote:Tell you what, D: Why don't we all agree to support ending anything any of us would deem as "welfare," corporate or otherwise. With one caveat.

And the caveat is that allowing people to keep their own money is not "welfare." So I'm not talking about "tax breaks."

You want to live in a world without taxes?

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:52 pm

D1B wrote:
Cap'n Cat wrote:Leave Rachel out of this. She's the frickin' High Priestess of Progressive Brainpower.

And, you, Ibadick, you start testin' one group, you gotta test them all. Start with drunk, illiterate contract fvcks like you. Then your girlfriend.

I know you and your bro are laughing your a$$es off at the first part of that comment, not the second part.

Not only is she the high priestess, she has a bigger pee pee than either of you.

YoUDeeMan · Post by **YoUDeeMan** » Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:18 pm

Let's test the politicians for drugs...and how about an IQ test, too.

They'd need a combined score of 6.93 to pass.

Post by **AshevilleApp** » Fri Sep 02, 2011 7:53 am

JayBilasBitesPillows wrote:These preliminary results actually help to prove the point I have been making all along.

Threaten generational dependency with loss of lifestyle, and you will drive better behaviors. In this case, 98% of those tested either got off of drugs or found innovative ways to beat the test.

Now, since these parasitic tapeworms have shown the ability to alter their behaviors to adjust to a changing environment, they certainly can and should be motivated to learn new skils, learn how to put on a condom, etc. and eventually learn to support their own damned existence.

oh, and nice name you gave me, D1B.........

Skills such as spelling?

JohnStOnge · Post by **JohnStOnge** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 5:33 pm

You want to live in a world without taxes?

If it were possible it would be nice but it's not possible. And that's not what I'm saying. I'm just saying let's not call a tax reduction or a tax break "welfare." Welfare is giving someone something they have not earned. When someone earns money then we "allow" them to keep it that is not "welfare."

Post by **kalm** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 5:40 pm

JohnStOnge wrote:
You want to live in a world without taxes?
If it were possible it would be nice but it's not possible. And that's not what I'm saying. I'm just saying let's not call a tax reduction or a tax break "welfare." Welfare is giving someone something they have not earned. When someone earns money then we "allow" them to keep it that is not "welfare."

So you think everyone who gets a tax reduction or tax break has "earned" their money in the "free market?"?

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 5:42 pm

kalm wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:
If it were possible it would be nice but it's not possible. And that's not what I'm saying. I'm just saying let's not call a tax reduction or a tax break "welfare." Welfare is giving someone something they have not earned. When someone earns money then we "allow" them to keep it that is not "welfare."
So you think everyone who gets a tax reduction or tax break "earns" it?

Don't be a jackass, kalm. They earned the money that's being taxed, didn't they?

JohnStOnge · Post by **JohnStOnge** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 5:58 pm

So you think everyone who gets a tax reduction or tax break has "earned" their money in the "free market?"?

There may be instances in which they did not earn the money. Maybe it was a gift. Maybe it was an inheritance. But the point is that allowing someone to keep what they already have is not the same thing as giving something to someone.

Post by **kalm** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:59 pm

JohnStOnge wrote:
So you think everyone who gets a tax reduction or tax break has "earned" their money in the "free market?"?
There may be instances in which they did not earn the money. Maybe it was a gift. Maybe it was an inheritance. But the point is that allowing someone to keep what they already have is not the same thing as giving something to someone.

I thought the point was allowing someone to keep what they earned. Good lord man, go back and read some human history.

Post by **kalm** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:00 pm

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
So you think everyone who gets a tax reduction or tax break "earns" it?
Don't be a jackass, kalm. They earned the money that's being taxed, didn't they?

Did they.

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:13 pm

kalm wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Don't be a jackass, kalm. They earned the money that's being taxed, didn't they?
Did they.

It's their money until someone takes if from them.

Post by **kalm** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:19 pm

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
Did they.

It's their money until someone takes if from them.

Thanks Prince John.

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:20 pm

kalm wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:

It's their money until someone takes if from them.
Thanks Prince John.

Ok, Sherriff of Nottingham.

Post by **kalm** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:32 pm

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
Thanks Prince John.
Ok, Sherriff of Nottingham.

Analogy fail

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:34 pm

kalm wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Ok, Sherriff of Nottingham.
Analogy fail

Why don't you go convene with your friends OBSF and JBB?

Post by **kalm** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:36 pm

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
Analogy fail

Why don't you go convene with your friends OBSF and JBB?

Oops! I thought that was an intentional bad analogy. My bad.

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:38 pm

kalm wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:

Why don't you go convene with your friends OBSF and JBB?
Oops! I thought that was an intentional bad analogy. My bad.

All my analogies are bad. It's my "thing". You obviously haven't been around here long enough.

Post by **kalm** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:41 pm

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
Oops! I thought that was an intentional bad analogy. My bad.

All my analogies are bad. It's my "thing". You obviously haven't been around here long enough.

Sorry for giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit

Re: Another conk attempt to villify the poor deemed bullshit