The New Totalitarians

[Baldy]

Respected judge, NAACP chapter president...going to get run over by the New Totalitarians.

Toledo judge refuses to perform gay marriage



Gen. Greenwald of the New Totalitarian Red Army, responded...

#tolerance

#intolerance

#doyourfuckingjobandleaveyourreligionoutofthecourtroom.

#ignorance

Officiating a civil marriage ceremony has nothing to do with a courtroom.

[houndawg]

Guys, in the United States in today's context the "left" is WAY worse about it. If you can't see that, you're blind. Or perhaps you've already been bludgeoned into submission.

Though, actually, I would probably say "brainwashed."

You're wrong, John. You really are.

[travelinman67]

Guys, in the United States in today's context the "left" is WAY worse about it. If you can't see that, you're blind. Or perhaps you've already been bludgeoned into submission.

Though, actually, I would probably say "brainwashed."

You're wrong, John. You really are.

...he replied, dogmatically.

[kalm]

#intolerance

#doyourfuckingjobandleaveyourreligionoutofthecourtroom.

#ignorance

Officiating a civil marriage ceremony has nothing to do with a courtroom.

#intoleranceofintolerance

#soifuckedup

#keepyourreligiuosviewsouttaofthelaw

[houndawg]

You're wrong, John. You really are.

...he replied, dogmatically.

..dawgmatically...

[Baldy]

#ignorance

Officiating a civil marriage ceremony has nothing to do with a courtroom.

#intoleranceofintolerance

#soifuckedup

#keepyourreligiuosviewsouttaofthelaw

The gist is, he wasn't intolerant. The judge wished them well and helped get another judge to marry the chicks. I don't care what your man crush says, there is a difference between intolerance and a simple disagreement.
#newtotalitarianklam

It is no different than a doctor refusing to perform an abortion due to his moral or religious beliefs. #freedomofassociation

[kalm]

#intoleranceofintolerance

#soifuckedup

#keepyourreligiuosviewsouttaofthelaw

The gist is, he wasn't intolerant. The judge wished them well and helped get another judge to marry the chicks. I don't care what your man crush says, there is a difference between intolerance and a simple disagreement.
#newtotalitarianklam

It is no different than a doctor refusing to perform an abortion due to his moral or religious beliefs. #freedomofassociation

It's different on several levels.

Should a doctor refuse to save a gay life based on his religion?

[CID1990]

The gist is, he wasn't intolerant. The judge wished them well and helped get another judge to marry the chicks. I don't care what your man crush says, there is a difference between intolerance and a simple disagreement.
#newtotalitarianklam

It is no different than a doctor refusing to perform an abortion due to his moral or religious beliefs. #freedomofassociation

It's different on several levels.

Should a doctor refuse to save a gay life based on his religion?

is the act of dying a gay thing?

[Chizzang]

its going to take some time...
This is one of those things that we'll all work through

in 50 years it'll seem stupid
today is seems like a big deal
Everybody who thinks it's a big deal will be dead in 50 years - life moves on

[Baldy]

The gist is, he wasn't intolerant. The judge wished them well and helped get another judge to marry the chicks. I don't care what your man crush says, there is a difference between intolerance and a simple disagreement.
#newtotalitarianklam

It is no different than a doctor refusing to perform an abortion due to his moral or religious beliefs. #freedomofassociation

It's different on several levels.

Should a doctor refuse to save a gay life based on his religion?

It depends.
Is the fetus gay?

[CID1990]

It's different on several levels.

Should a doctor refuse to save a gay life based on his religion?

It depends.
Is the fetus gay?

give him some time to rethink his ridiculous question

[Chizzang]

It depends.
Is the fetus gay?

give him some time to rethink his ridiculous question

Several "ridiculous" things are happening simultaneously

1) We're defending "ridiculous" religious beliefs (because that's what we do)
The entire world of 2015 should really be "who gives a flying fuck if two fags get married"
But instead oh lordy...
The Baby Jeezus parted the seas for Noah and killed the fags
So America is doomed to burn in eternal hells and stuff

IQ test anybody..?

2) We're making ludicrous comparisons to draw attention to ridiculous stone age nonsense

Aren't we all parading around on one high horse or another in this retarded debate..?

[CAA Flagship]

give him some time to rethink his ridiculous question

Several "ridiculous" things are happening simultaneously

1) We're defending "ridiculous" religious beliefs (because that's what we do)
The entire world of 2015 should really be "who gives a flying fuck if two fags get married"
But instead oh lordy...
The Baby Jeezus parted the seas for Noah and killed the fags
So America is doomed to burn in eternal hells and stuff

IQ test anybody..?

2) We're making ludicrous comparisons to draw attention to ridiculous stone age nonsense

Aren't we all parading around on one high horse or another in this retarded debate..?

JFC. Now horses are smoking weed?

[CID1990]

give him some time to rethink his ridiculous question

Several "ridiculous" things are happening simultaneously

1) We're defending "ridiculous" religious beliefs (because that's what we do)
The entire world of 2015 should really be "who gives a flying **** if two fags get married"
But instead oh lordy...
The Baby Jeezus parted the seas for Noah and killed the fags
So America is doomed to burn in eternal hells and stuff

IQ test anybody..?

2) We're making ludicrous comparisons to draw attention to ridiculous stone age nonsense

Aren't we all parading around on one high horse or another in this retarded debate..?

well your rant aside

i just saw a difference between refusing to marry a gay couple

and allowing a gay person to die

maybe Im alone here but I see a load of daylight between those two things

you may return to your horse

[CitadelGrad]

It's different on several levels.

Should a doctor refuse to save a gay life based on his religion?

is the act of dying a gay thing?

No, but drama is.

[kalm]

Several "ridiculous" things are happening simultaneously

1) We're defending "ridiculous" religious beliefs (because that's what we do)
The entire world of 2015 should really be "who gives a flying **** if two fags get married"
But instead oh lordy...
The Baby Jeezus parted the seas for Noah and killed the fags
So America is doomed to burn in eternal hells and stuff

IQ test anybody..?

2) We're making ludicrous comparisons to draw attention to ridiculous stone age nonsense

Aren't we all parading around on one high horse or another in this retarded debate..?

well your rant aside

i just saw a difference between refusing to marry a gay couple

and allowing a gay person to die

maybe Im alone here but I see a load of daylight between those two things

you may return to your horse

Baldy made the original comparison. Context may help you here.

[Baldy]

well your rant aside

i just saw a difference between refusing to marry a gay couple

and allowing a gay person to die

maybe Im alone here but I see a load of daylight between those two things

you may return to your horse

Baldy made the original comparison. Context may help you here.

I did?
You might want to reread the thread.

I compared a judge refusing to marry a gay couple to a doctor not performing an abortion based on moral and/or religious grounds.

You clearly went to the extreme and tried to equate those with a doctor killing a gay person by refusing to provide medical care. Well...unless you're saying that a living breathing person is the same thing as an unborn fetus in the womb.

Be careful what you say, or you're gonna have to turn in your progressive card.

[Chizzang]

Several "ridiculous" things are happening simultaneously

1) We're defending "ridiculous" religious beliefs (because that's what we do)
The entire world of 2015 should really be "who gives a flying **** if two fags get married"
But instead oh lordy...
The Baby Jeezus parted the seas for Noah and killed the fags
So America is doomed to burn in eternal hells and stuff

IQ test anybody..?

2) We're making ludicrous comparisons to draw attention to ridiculous stone age nonsense

Aren't we all parading around on one high horse or another in this retarded debate..?

well your rant aside

i just saw a difference between refusing to marry a gay couple

and allowing a gay person to die

maybe Im alone here but I see a load of daylight between those two things

you may return to your horse

The entire argument about who should be "allowed" to get married
is an embarrassment to society as a whole

A) Who cares (primarily)
and
B) The Federal Govt. gives financial advantages for Marriage
C) The end

The fact that it hurts somebody'f feelings
is perhaps the worlds largest eye roll and "so what..."

[JohnStOnge]

a doctor killing a gay person by refusing to provide medical care.

Just as an aside, a doctor who allows someone to die by virtue of refusing to provide medical care does not kill that person.

And it's an important distinction. Opting not to help someone is not the same as attacking someone. We seem to have lost sight of that. Nobody should ever be FORCED to help someone else.

[JohnStOnge]

B) The Federal Govt. gives financial advantages for Marriage

The Federal Government could have offered the advantages to homosexual couples without requiring that the relationship be called marriage. But that would not have been sufficient because the real underlying motivation is to compel the culture to embrace a lie. That lie is the idea that homosexuality vs. heterosexuality is like having green eyes vs. brown eyes. That a homosexual relationship is equivalent to a heterosexual relationship. That sort of thing. It relates to New Totalitarians theme.

Homosexuals want to be lied to. They want to be told their sexual orientation is normal when it's not. And, unfortunately, they now have plenty of allies thanks to the American Psychiatric Association taking a position based on politics/philosophy rather than science and to about 30 years of brainwashing.

[Chizzang]

B) The Federal Govt. gives financial advantages for Marriage

The Federal Government could have offered the advantages to homosexual couples without requiring that the relationship be called marriage. But that would not have been sufficient because the real underlying motivation is to compel the culture to embrace a lie. That lie is the idea that homosexuality vs. heterosexuality is like having green eyes vs. brown eyes. That a homosexual relationship is equivalent to a heterosexual relationship. That sort of thing. It relates to New Totalitarians theme.

Homosexuals want to be lied to. They want to be told their sexual orientation is normal when it's not. And, unfortunately, they now have plenty of allies thanks to the American Psychiatric Association taking a position based on politics/philosophy rather than science and to about 30 years of brainwashing.

I have never met one homosexual that thinks their orientation is "normal"
they are reminded every single day that it is not
and I don't know any who are confused by that

[kalm]

Baldy made the original comparison. Context may help you here.

I did?
You might want to reread the thread.

I compared a judge refusing to marry a gay couple to a doctor not performing an abortion based on moral and/or religious grounds.

You clearly went to the extreme and tried to equate those with a doctor killing a gay person by refusing to provide medical care. Well...unless you're saying that a living breathing person is the same thing as an unborn fetus in the womb.

Be careful what you say, or you're gonna have to turn in your progressive card.

You "equated". I asked a question. Try and and do better next time.

[CID1990]

well your rant aside

i just saw a difference between refusing to marry a gay couple

and allowing a gay person to die

maybe Im alone here but I see a load of daylight between those two things

you may return to your horse

The entire argument about who should be "allowed" to get married
is an embarrassment to society as a whole

A) Who cares (primarily)
and
B) The Federal Govt. gives financial advantages for Marriage
C) The end

The fact that it hurts somebody'f feelings
is perhaps the worlds largest eye roll and "so what..."

I DONT care - Ive been pretty consistent on that

I was pointing out that refusing to marry gays is somehow being thrown into equivalence with allowing them to die - and pointing out the absurdity

we either cheapen the serious or overdramatize the trivial

[Baldy]

I did?
You might want to reread the thread.

I compared a judge refusing to marry a gay couple to a doctor not performing an abortion based on moral and/or religious grounds.

You clearly went to the extreme and tried to equate those with a doctor killing a gay person by refusing to provide medical care. Well...unless you're saying that a living breathing person is the same thing as an unborn fetus in the womb.

Be careful what you say, or you're gonna have to turn in your progressive card.

You compared. I asked a stupid question. I have to try and and do better.

Accuracy.

[Baldy]

The entire argument about who should be "allowed" to get married
is an embarrassment to society as a whole

A) Who cares (primarily)
and
B) The Federal Govt. gives financial advantages for Marriage
C) The end

The fact that it hurts somebody'f feelings
is perhaps the worlds largest eye roll and "so what..."

I DONT care - Ive been pretty consistent on that

I was pointing out that refusing to marry gays is somehow being thrown into equivalence with allowing them to die - and pointing out the absurdity

we either cheapen the serious or overdramatize the trivial

Quoted for emphasis.