Dick Cheney: Memory Loss or Just Another Conk Dumbfuck?

[travelinman67]

T,
Shut your yap and get to Minnesota....soon.

Looks like I'm heading EC this fall, Phillipines next spring...dunno after that.

[D1B]

Joltin Joe kicks my ass so bad, I've got no hope but to take cheap shots at him in threads he's not even participating in.

You're famous for losing and the depth of depravity you'll stoop to to appear legit. So much so, several terms are named after you: Joltian, Joltinian....

Joltinian
adjective \jo-tin-e'-in\

: callous disregard for the truth
: chronic use of fallacious logic
: defaulting to report card or USN&WR College Rankings to appear to win debate or ward off truth
: approving, defense of catholic priests as pedophiles

Used in a sentence:

"Did you read in the paper about that catholic priest who raped the baby? Apparently he recorded it on his iphone and posted it for other priests. They siezed the hard drives. They found his DNA on the victim and all over the confessional. He even admitted to the crime upon arrest."

"Yes, I did. He's a victim of catholic bashing and the Pleasantville Town Gazette is a known anti-catholic rag. The editor did not go to Fordham, therefore the priest is innocent."

"Wow, how Joltinian of you."


*For accuracy sake, Tman mentioned you, not me.

[houndawg]

Houndawg is debating. No one is quite sure what you're doing.

CC one post of Houndawgs in this thread where he argues a position and provides a link to data supporting his position, and I'll stop posting in this thread.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/Presi ... rends.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Read it and weep. Looks like the "historical bottom" of support is in the 20s (Truman, Nixon, Carter, Bush I, Bush II)

Buhbye.

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

Keep it up TMan you are working these freeloading leftwing nut jobs. You are kicking their ass so bad they are shitting Air Jordan's. Size 12 extra fat

[houndawg]

Keep it up TMan you are working these freeloading leftwing nut jobs. You are kicking their ass so bad they are shitting Air Jordan's. Size 12 extra fat

Hey Teabaggedby67, your chihuahua got out and is yapping at the neighbors.

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

Hey Earnest Lemmingway called.........he wants his schtick back

[kalm]

Translation: "I can't support my claim about Obamas numbers so I will deflect to the great and powerful houndawg".

Google either wikipedia or Gallup. Both confirm...

President Obama has averaged an approval rating of 48% through his first five-plus years in office, which has dropped his average approval belowRichard Nixon (49.1%) and George W. Bush (49.4%). Historical Gallup Poll approval highs and lows for each President since 1937:[11][nb 1]

Once again, I support my assertion...

...and you blow hot air and waste everyone's time.

Grow up.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/Barac ... roval.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[JoltinJoe]

I'm famous for losing in colossally stupid ways and I'll stoop to any tactic to appear legit. So much so, several terms are named after me: D1B

[travelinman67]

CC one post of Houndawgs in this thread where he argues a position and provides a link to data supporting his position, and I'll stop posting in this thread.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/Presi ... rends.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Read it and weep. Looks like the "historical bottom" of support is in the 20s (Truman, Nixon, Carter, Bush I, Bush II)

Buhbye.

That link doesn't even list Obama, Einstein.

Try again.

[Skjellyfetti]

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/Presi ... rends.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Read it and weep. Looks like the "historical bottom" of support is in the 20s (Truman, Nixon, Carter, Bush I, Bush II)

Buhbye.

That link doesn't even list Obama, Einstein.

Try again.

It's not hard to do this shit yourself.

Obama's all time low on gallup was 38% from October 2011.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/Barac ... roval.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

GWB's all time low was 25%.




And, the only president listed with a higher "all time low" than Obama was Kennedy.

[travelinman67]

Keep it up TMan you are working these freeloading leftwing nut jobs. You are kicking their ass so bad they are shitting Air Jordan's. Size 12 extra fat

Hey Teabaggedby67, your chihuahua got out and is yapping at the neighbors.

Houndawg debating skills, in peak form.

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

Hey Teabaggedby67, your chihuahua got out and is yapping at the neighbors.

Houndawg debating skills, in peak form.

where I come from we call that getting "D1B'ed"

[travelinman67]

That link doesn't even list Obama, Einstein.

Try again.

It's not hard to do this shit yourself.

Obama's all time low on gallup was 38% from October 2011.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/Barac ... roval.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

GWB's all time low was 25%.




And, the only president listed with a higher "all time low" than Obama was Kennedy.

Wrong again...

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-even ... aseID=1975

Keep trying.

You do realize this is off topic?

[Skjellyfetti]

Wrong again...

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-even ... aseID=1975

Keep trying.

You do realize this is off topic?

Goddamn dude.

Houndawg's first post was on historical Gallup trends.

You responded that it didn't include Obama's numbers.

I provided Obama's Gallup numbers.

You say "wrong" and provide Quinnipiac numbers.

[travelinman67]

Urp!

Jump back in, Kalm.

Your kin folk look a little saddle sore...

...lookin' like they need a rest.

[travelinman67]

Wrong again...

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-even ... aseID=1975

Keep trying.

You do realize this is off topic?

Goddamn dude.

Houndawg's first post was on historical Gallup trends.

You responded that it didn't include Obama's numbers.

I provided Obama's Gallup numbers.

You say "wrong" and provide Quinnipiac numbers.

Your Gallup Obama numbers are significantly different from other polls.

In all fairness, the initial issue was my statement that Obama was the worst POTUS of the past 120 years. Regardless of whether a poll shows Obama's lowest approval rating was 38%, 24%, 41% or 32%...

...I still stand by my statement that he's the worst POTUS of the past 120 years.

The irreparable damage resulting from his regulatory assault, alone, creates his destructive legacy. No other POTUS in the past century has approached the economic damage done by Obama's actions and policies.

I understand you disagree, however, my business accumen and experience dwarfs your academic/operative/talking points knowledge (just being frank), so, your opinion really is irrelevant.

[D1B]

Keep it up TMan you are working these freeloading leftwing nut jobs. You are kicking their ass so bad they are shitting Air Jordan's. Size 12 extra fat

ALPACAJIZ1, sucking my dick and copying my wise cracks.

[D1B]

I'm famous for losing in colossally stupid ways and I'll stoop to any tactic to appear legit. So much so, several terms are named after me: D1B

Last edited by JoltinJoe on Mon Jun 23, 2014 5:29 pm, edited 3 times in total

[D1B]

Goddamn dude.

Houndawg's first post was on historical Gallup trends.

You responded that it didn't include Obama's numbers.

I provided Obama's Gallup numbers.

You say "wrong" and provide Quinnipiac numbers.

Your Gallup Obama numbers are significantly different from other polls.

In all fairness, the initial issue was my statement that Obama was the worst POTUS of the past 120 years. Regardless of whether a poll shows Obama's lowest approval rating was 38%, 24%, 41% or 32%...

...I still stand by my statement that he's the worst POTUS of the past 120 years.

The irreparable damage resulting from his regulatory assault, alone, creates his destructive legacy. No other POTUS in the past century has approached the economic damage done by Obama's actions and policies.

I understand you disagree, however, my business accumen and experience dwarfs your academic/operative/talking points knowledge (just being frank), so, your opinion really is irrelevant.

Tbag, parading biased opinion as fact, again.

[houndawg]

CC one post of Houndawgs in this thread where he argues a position and provides a link to data supporting his position, and I'll stop posting in this thread.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/Presi ... rends.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Read it and weep. Looks like the "historical bottom" of support is in the 20s (Truman, Nixon, Carter, Bush I, Bush II)

Buhbye.

That was really mean of you to get our hopes up like that, Teabaggedin67.

[houndawg]

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/Presi ... rends.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Read it and weep. Looks like the "historical bottom" of support is in the 20s (Truman, Nixon, Carter, Bush I, Bush II)

Buhbye.

That link doesn't even list Obama, Einstein.

Try again.

He isn't done yet, Heisenberg. Have to wait until after his third term.

[JoltinJoe]

Last edited by JoltinJoe on Mon Jun 23, 2014 5:29 pm, edited 3 times in total

Maybe it took my three times to get it right, but you have no idea how I got that coding to work.

[Skjellyfetti]

Your Gallup Obama numbers are significantly different from other polls.

If you had a problem with Gallup's numbers you should have said that to begin with, though. Not "they don't include Obama's numbers."

Because when presented with Obama's numbers... you're forced to backpedal to continue your argument.

[D1B]

Maybe it took my three times to get it right, but you have no idea how I got that coding to work.

It has got to be tough to compose through a thick, toxic cloud of rage and envy.

[D1B]

Your Gallup Obama numbers are significantly different from other polls.

If you had a problem with Gallup's numbers you should have said that to begin with, though. Not "they don't include Obama's numbers."

Because when presented with Obama's numbers... you're forced to backpedal to continue your argument.

Top: Travelingfarawaysoonfromcs.comman67 Bottom: Jelly/Houndawg