So, you agree that you are an ass-munch. Not that there's anything wrong with that.CID1990 wrote:No, because if I did it to a Mack truck I might get hurt, dork.death dealer wrote: As you should. I'm assuming you treat other motorists and legal occupants of the road equally? To single out one otherwise legitimate group differently than another would make you a serious ass-munch.
Sent from the center of the universe.
Tax on bicycles justified because of their pollution:
- death dealer
- Level3

- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:49 am
- I am a fan of: Appalachian Mud Squids
- A.K.A.: Contaminated
Re: Tax on bicycles justified because of their pollution:
Dear lord... please allow this dangerous combination of hair spary, bat slobber, and D.O.T. four automatic transmission fluid to excite my mind, occupy my spirits, and enrage my body, provoking me to kick any man or woman in the back of the head regardless of what he or she has or has not done unto me. All my Best, Earlie Cuyler.
Re: Tax on bicycles justified because of their pollution:
That's because of the way that Brooks form....a short doesn't allow them to get the proper fit.Skjellyfetti wrote:Don't need cushy chamois if you have a Brooks saddle. Thing has formed to every nook and cranny of my nether regions and couldn't be more comfortable. Actually, it is even less comfortable if I wear chamois.death dealer wrote:Well, I'm sure that the seat doesn't hurt your vagina, but for those of us with a nutsack, that big cushy chamois in those bike shorts makes riding the 250+ miles I ride a week much more tolerable for those nuts.I wear gore bibs and whatever jersey is on top of the pile.
Couldn't imagine riding on a racing saddle. But, if you actually race, then more power to you cause the bit of weight difference actually matters to you. It's the people that think they need all that kind of shit because that's what Lance Armstrong uses that crack me up.
Regular ole clothes served me plenty well from Tennessee to Mexico.Any moron who would go out on a 75 mile ride in work out clothes deserves the the raging case of monkey butt they'll have afterwards.![]()
I know. I'm just talking about the posers that have to buy all the gear to go out on their 15 mile jaunts down the Blue Ridge Parkway.death dealer wrote:And you aren't blowing by any real cyclists on your schwinn, so get over yourself. You couldn't keep up with me if I were on a stationary bike.![]()
My comment wasn't to say that I'm a fast cyclist by any means. I ride for recreation... I don't really give a fuck how fast I go (except on descents). I don't know how fast you ride... but, any cyclist that talks shit... would probably leave me in the dust.
However, I don't have a Brooks on my bike - nor do I do enough miles to warrant spending the money on a Brooks. I still have the standard seat that came with my bike - the Bontrager H1 saddle. Yeah, when I'm out my Attack bibs are awesome.
- GrizFanStuckInUtah
- Level3

- Posts: 3758
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:27 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Tax on bicycles justified because of their pollution:
I only have a few things to add to the posts above:
1) Seats on a bike are unique to each rider, they make 15,000 different seats because there at 15,000 different ass shapes.
2) I could care less if I annoy someone with what I wear when I ride. I wear clothes that are functional for the ride. I kinda think it is an added benefit if it pisses someone off.
3) It won't be much longer until I start riding armed, you've been warned.
4) I obey traffic laws and go out of my way to ride where there is plenty of room. If someone doesn't like it, see #3 above.
5) I know cycling is risky but so is being a fat ass.
1) Seats on a bike are unique to each rider, they make 15,000 different seats because there at 15,000 different ass shapes.
2) I could care less if I annoy someone with what I wear when I ride. I wear clothes that are functional for the ride. I kinda think it is an added benefit if it pisses someone off.
3) It won't be much longer until I start riding armed, you've been warned.
4) I obey traffic laws and go out of my way to ride where there is plenty of room. If someone doesn't like it, see #3 above.
5) I know cycling is risky but so is being a fat ass.
-Go Griz!
-Class of '97
-Thank you to all our Veterans.
-Class of '97
-Thank you to all our Veterans.
Re: Tax on bicycles justified because of their pollution:
This thread does remind me I need a new comfort bike. No point in driving to work when most of the schools I go to are 1-5 miles away. Any recommendations, preferably under $350 (needs a basket/box too)?
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Tax on bicycles justified because of their pollution:
GrizFanStuckInUtah wrote:I only have a few things to add to the posts above:
1) Seats on a bike are unique to each rider, they make 15,000 different seats because there at 15,000 different ass shapes.
2) I could care less if I annoy someone with what I wear when I ride. I wear clothes that are functional for the ride. I kinda think it is an added benefit if it pisses someone off.![]()
3) It won't be much longer until I start riding armed, you've been warned.![]()
4) I obey traffic laws and go out of my way to ride where there is plenty of room. If someone doesn't like it, see #3 above.
5) I know cycling is risky but so is being a fat ass.
Re: Tax on bicycles justified because of their pollution:
bump your limit a couple bucks and go with a Trek FX series. There is a magic number on bikes, that if you don't hit that price you are getting a piece of shit. I sell bikes as part of my job, and I can say in my experience selling (and riding) as well as talking with serious bike riders (I work with a guy who has ridden his bike to work every single day for over 15 years regardless of weather, and another that is going on a year, and a couple others who put thousands of miles on per year) that price seems to be 400 for your commuter/hybrid bike.∞∞∞ wrote:This thread does remind me I need a new comfort bike. No point in driving to work when most of the schools I go to are 1-5 miles away. Any recommendations, preferably under $350 (needs a basket/box too)?
Can put racks up front and back, pannier bags, a basket if you so wish, etc...
It can go for up to 30-40 miles rather comfortably if you so choose.
FWIW, I have the 7.4 from Trek, though I'm selling it to a buddy this summer and buying the Trek 8.5
- death dealer
- Level3

- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:49 am
- I am a fan of: Appalachian Mud Squids
- A.K.A.: Contaminated
Re: Tax on bicycles justified because of their pollution:
Right now I carry a can of pepper spray, but I am considering a lightweight handgun. I had a guy come at me with a crowbar last year. Some folks are such pussies.GrizFanStuckInUtah wrote:I only have a few things to add to the posts above:
1) Seats on a bike are unique to each rider, they make 15,000 different seats because there at 15,000 different ass shapes.
2) I could care less if I annoy someone with what I wear when I ride. I wear clothes that are functional for the ride. I kinda think it is an added benefit if it pisses someone off.![]()
3) It won't be much longer until I start riding armed, you've been warned.![]()
4) I obey traffic laws and go out of my way to ride where there is plenty of room. If someone doesn't like it, see #3 above.
5) I know cycling is risky but so is being a fat ass.
Dear lord... please allow this dangerous combination of hair spary, bat slobber, and D.O.T. four automatic transmission fluid to excite my mind, occupy my spirits, and enrage my body, provoking me to kick any man or woman in the back of the head regardless of what he or she has or has not done unto me. All my Best, Earlie Cuyler.


