Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
Me, I like burning gas and oil. It seems to work great. I put it in my vehicle and it goes down the road. Why do we need to even discuss this....Spandos... We seem to have a fairly good grasp on how this oil thing works so why change?
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
Oh, and we should be eating corn and using the rest for feed, NOT making ethanol. What a waste.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
-
expandspanos
- Level2

- Posts: 1970
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:16 am
- I am a fan of: School of Hard Knocks
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
Well, obviously people would rather be feeding their families than bending over paying a kings ransom to move their ass down the road.grizzaholic wrote:Me, I like burning gas and oil. It seems to work great. I put it in my vehicle and it goes down the road. Why do we need to even discuss this....Spandos... We seem to have a fairly good grasp on how this oil thing works so why change?
Obviously we are being ripped off when a teenager can build an electric vehicle that cost 2 cents a mile to opperate:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9d3wAjdknA[/youtube]
You're telling me the billion dollar think tanks sitting in the plush boardrooms and engineers at Ford, GM, etc. can't build us a car that doesn't bend everybody over and rob them of their hard earned income?.. as gas climbs higher and higher and higher?
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
I don't think gas is all that bad. It is, what, 3 bucks a gallon? Let me know when NASCAR, INDY, air shows, Monster Truck races, boat racing, drag racing, ( I know I am leaving a ton out ) stop happening and then I will "THINK" about what to do. Oil will be around in stockpiles until we all have those fancy dancy cars from Demolition Man.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
-
expandspanos
- Level2

- Posts: 1970
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:16 am
- I am a fan of: School of Hard Knocks
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
Here gas is $4.50 and rising daily.grizzaholic wrote:I don't think gas is all that bad. It is, what, 3 bucks a gallon? Let me know when NASCAR, INDY, air shows, Monster Truck races, boat racing, drag racing, ( I know I am leaving a ton out ) stop happening and then I will "THINK" about what to do. Oil will be around in stockpiles until we all have those fancy dancy cars from Demolition Man.

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
...reallyexpandspanos wrote:Here gas is $4.50 and rising daily.grizzaholic wrote:I don't think gas is all that bad. It is, what, 3 bucks a gallon? Let me know when NASCAR, INDY, air shows, Monster Truck races, boat racing, drag racing, ( I know I am leaving a ton out ) stop happening and then I will "THINK" about what to do. Oil will be around in stockpiles until we all have those fancy dancy cars from Demolition Man.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/ ... -equation/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;A car buyer who lays out an extra $6,200 extra to buy the hybrid version of the Lexus RX will get the money back in gas savings within five years, according to Consumer Reports magazine, but only if gasoline averages $8.77 a gallon. Otherwise, the nonhybrid RX 350 is a better buy than the Hybrid 450h, the magazine says. The hybrid gets 26 miles per gallon, and the nonhybrid, 21, in the magazine’s calculation.
The magazine’s annual New Car Buying Guide includes a table that compares several hybrid cars with their nonhybrid versions, or, in the case of cars that come only in hybrid models, to similar cars by the same manufacturer that are not hybrids.
For example, the Honda Insight comes only in a hybrid version, so it was compared with the nonhybrid Honda Fit; gasoline would have to rise to $10.08 to even out the extra expense, Consumer Reports said. The Insight sells for $22,010 and the Fit for $16,260.
The researchers use a five-year payback period because that is a typical duration for car ownership. It assumed that the driver would log 12,000 miles a year and pay $2.80 a gallon, a price that now looks a bit on the low side.
The Toyota Prius, the most popular hybrid, did far better in the magazine’s comparison. Consumer Reports paired it with the Toyota Corolla LE, comparing the hybrid’s 44 miles per gallon and purchase price of $22,950 with the Corolla’s $17,950 list price and 32 miles per gallon. The Prius will cost less over a five-year period as long as the price of gasoline averages only 80 cents a gallon, the magazine calculated.
For some models, the choice is close to neutral from a financial point of view. The Ford Escape hybrid would cost $500 more over five years, but would break even if gasoline prices averaged $3.60. The Toyota Camry hybrid would save $500 over five years by comparison with the Camry LE 4-cylinder and remains a better deal if the price of gasoline averages just $1.92.
-
HI54UNI
- Supporter

- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
- I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
- A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
- Location: The Panther State
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
Nobody wants to ride in that death trap. They also want a/c, satellite radio, navigation, etc. and all of those use electricity.expandspanos wrote:Well, obviously people would rather be feeding their families than bending over paying a kings ransom to move their ass down the road.grizzaholic wrote:Me, I like burning gas and oil. It seems to work great. I put it in my vehicle and it goes down the road. Why do we need to even discuss this....Spandos... We seem to have a fairly good grasp on how this oil thing works so why change?
Obviously we are being ripped off when a teenager can build an electric vehicle that cost 2 cents a mile to opperate:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9d3wAjdknA[/youtube]
You're telling me the billion dollar think tanks sitting in the plush boardrooms and engineers at Ford, GM, etc. can't build us a car that doesn't bend everybody over and rob them of their hard earned income?.. as gas climbs higher and higher and higher?
Natural gas is the way to go. The infrastructure is generally already in place. You can also fuel up quickly, not wait 20-40-60 minutes for a quick charge.
You want to get rich - figure out a way to economically store electricity on a large scale in a small foot print so electric cars work, energy from the worthless windmills can be stored, etc. You will make Bill Gates look like a pauper.
Last edited by HI54UNI on Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet

- Posts: 20857
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
Gas is near $4 in Lodi again, over $4 at at least premium and often mid-grade as well. Chevron is over at all grades. When it shot up, it REALLY shot up.
I agree with grizza about corn gas. Corn is for eating, and anything that takes away from eating (human or animal) is bad.
I don't know if anyone's perfected a safe way to burn methane (particularly without the smell associated with it), but choices would be good. The added competition should drive prices down, assuming the gas companies actually obey the law of supply and demand (which they haven't recently).
I agree with grizza about corn gas. Corn is for eating, and anything that takes away from eating (human or animal) is bad.
I don't know if anyone's perfected a safe way to burn methane (particularly without the smell associated with it), but choices would be good. The added competition should drive prices down, assuming the gas companies actually obey the law of supply and demand (which they haven't recently).

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
HI, you are probably the most level headed poster here, but I disagree with your natural gas or electricity comments.
Natural gas should be for BBQ's, homes, and Hipsters. Electricity should be forgotten for cars.
Oil will never run out, and before I get skewered over the "never" I use that term for 500 years or so. Technology will get us all nu'clear powered cars.
Natural gas should be for BBQ's, homes, and Hipsters. Electricity should be forgotten for cars.
Oil will never run out, and before I get skewered over the "never" I use that term for 500 years or so. Technology will get us all nu'clear powered cars.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
-
HI54UNI
- Supporter

- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
- I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
- A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
- Location: The Panther State
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
Actually one of the ethanol byproducts is distillers grain which is still used as animal feed so there is still food value. The biggest reason to dislike ethanol is the amount of water used in its production.SuperHornet wrote:Gas is near $4 in Lodi again, over $4 at at least premium and often mid-grade as well. Chevron is over at all grades. When it shot up, it REALLY shot up.
I agree with grizza about corn gas. Corn is for eating, and anything that takes away from eating (human or animal) is bad.
I don't know if anyone's perfected a safe way to burn methane (particularly without the smell associated with it), but choices would be good. The added competition should drive prices down, assuming the gas companies actually obey the law of supply and demand (which they haven't recently).
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
-
HI54UNI
- Supporter

- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
- I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
- A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
- Location: The Panther State
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
I don't disagree with you. Right now the only way an electric car is semi-useful is for commuting in stop and go traffic. As ASUG8 pointed out you are better off buying a fuel efficient regular vehicle if you want to save money.grizzaholic wrote:HI, you are probably the most level headed poster here, but I disagree with your natural gas or electricity comments.
Natural gas should be for BBQ's, homes, and Hipsters. Electricity should be forgotten for cars.
Oil will never run out, and before I get skewered over the "never" I use that term for 500 years or so. Technology will get us all nu'clear powered cars.
My main reason for suggesting natural gas is because we have a lot of it and because it would be better than using electricity for vehicles. Plus we could tell the Arabs to go fuck themselves.
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
I tried to read ASUG6's post but all the numbers confused me. I took math 205 from OSBF in college.HI54UNI wrote:I don't disagree with you. Right now the only way an electric car is semi-useful is for commuting in stop and go traffic. As ASUG8 pointed out you are better off buying a fuel efficient regular vehicle if you want to save money.grizzaholic wrote:HI, you are probably the most level headed poster here, but I disagree with your natural gas or electricity comments.
Natural gas should be for BBQ's, homes, and Hipsters. Electricity should be forgotten for cars.
Oil will never run out, and before I get skewered over the "never" I use that term for 500 years or so. Technology will get us all nu'clear powered cars.
My main reason for suggesting natural gas is because we have a lot of it and because it would be better than using electricity for vehicles. Plus we could tell the Arabs to go fuck themselves.
I tell Trip to fuck off all the time.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
I think history will look back and see ethanol as one of our biggest energy failures. 
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
∞∞∞ wrote:I think history will look back and see ethanol as one of our biggest energy failures.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
- BDKJMU
- Level5

- Posts: 36392
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
So 40% of the nations corn crop goes to ethanol. Get a quarter of that back in animal feed. At the end of the day still leaves 30% going to ethanol- that is the biggest reason to dislike it. It drives up virtually all food prices.HI54UNI wrote:Actually one of the ethanol byproducts is distillers grain which is still used as animal feed so there is still food value. The biggest reason to dislike ethanol is the amount of water used in its production.SuperHornet wrote:Gas is near $4 in Lodi again, over $4 at at least premium and often mid-grade as well. Chevron is over at all grades. When it shot up, it REALLY shot up.
I agree with grizza about corn gas. Corn is for eating, and anything that takes away from eating (human or animal) is bad.
I don't know if anyone's perfected a safe way to burn methane (particularly without the smell associated with it), but choices would be good. The added competition should drive prices down, assuming the gas companies actually obey the law of supply and demand (which they haven't recently).
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
-
AshevilleApp
- Supporter

- Posts: 5306
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:29 pm
- I am a fan of: ASU
- A.K.A.: AshevilleApp2
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
Yes.HI54UNI wrote:Actually one of the ethanol byproducts is distillers grain which is still used as animal feed so there is still food value. The biggest reason to dislike ethanol is the amount of water used in its production.SuperHornet wrote:Gas is near $4 in Lodi again, over $4 at at least premium and often mid-grade as well. Chevron is over at all grades. When it shot up, it REALLY shot up.
I agree with grizza about corn gas. Corn is for eating, and anything that takes away from eating (human or animal) is bad.
I don't know if anyone's perfected a safe way to burn methane (particularly without the smell associated with it), but choices would be good. The added competition should drive prices down, assuming the gas companies actually obey the law of supply and demand (which they haven't recently).
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
grizzaholic wrote:I tried to read ASUG6's post but all the numbers confused me. I took math 205 from OSBF in college.HI54UNI wrote:
I don't disagree with you. Right now the only way an electric car is semi-useful is for commuting in stop and go traffic. As ASUG8 pointed out you are better off buying a fuel efficient regular vehicle if you want to save money.
My main reason for suggesting natural gas is because we have a lot of it and because it would be better than using electricity for vehicles. Plus we could tell the Arabs to go fuck themselves.
I tell Trip to fuck off all the time.
There's no one on this board aside from OSBF himself that could pass that course. Maybe Opie.......
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
You weren't there, so shut it. It was a very difficult class and I had to learn lots of new and exciting ways to make math so much easier.ASUG8 wrote:grizzaholic wrote:
I tried to read ASUG6's post but all the numbers confused me. I took math 205 from OSBF in college.
I tell Trip to fuck off all the time.![]()
There's no one on this board aside from OSBF himself that could pass that course. Maybe Opie.......
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
- mrklean
- Level3

- Posts: 3794
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:06 am
- I am a fan of: Georgia Southern Uni.
- Location: Stockbridge, GA
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
The Problem is not gas vs. water vs. electric, its really how much bang you get for your buck. Tell me when you can get a V6 at 40 MPG or a V6 /5.6 at 30 MPG. We have the tech to do it. and we all know why they won't. Trust me, THe V6 with 30 MPG has been invented. a while ago. FACT!!!!!
-
CAA Flagship
- 4th&29

- Posts: 38529
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
Does history ever look forward?∞∞∞ wrote:I think history will look back....
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
If it is fact, post the factsmrklean wrote:The Problem is not gas vs. water vs. electric, its really how much bang you get for your buck. Tell me when you can get a V6 at 40 MPG or a V6 /5.6 at 30 MPG. We have the tech to do it. and we all know why they won't. Trust me, THe V6 with 30 MPG has been invented. a while ago. FACT!!!!!
I don't care if you do or not. I will burn a bucket of gas in your honor today.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
- GannonFan
- Level5

- Posts: 19233
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
No need to wait for that. We already recognize now it is one of our bigger energy failures. Trouble is convincing the politicians to just let it go - some just can't let go of that porkbarrel no matter how bad the policy is.∞∞∞ wrote:I think history will look back and see ethanol as one of our biggest energy failures.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69187
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars
I wonder if Monsanto and other big AG have prospered from it?GannonFan wrote:No need to wait for that. We already recognize now it is one of our bigger energy failures. Trouble is convincing the politicians to just let it go - some just can't let go of that porkbarrel no matter how bad the policy is.∞∞∞ wrote:I think history will look back and see ethanol as one of our biggest energy failures.





