Fuck You Dianne Feinstein

[GannonFan]

Well, I'd deal with the confiscation when that comes up -

And that is too late.

Please. That line of thinking is basically saying that while we don't think the government can go around and confiscate all the guns, really what they're missing is the list of the guns - once they get the list they can all of sudden go and get them? Again, that's just a lazy, illogical line of thinking, assuming you can actually call it thinking.

[grizzaholic]

And that is too late.

Please. That line of thinking is basically saying that while we don't think the government can go around and confiscate all the guns, really what they're missing is the list of the guns - once they get the list they can all of sudden go and get them? Again, that's just a lazy, illogical line of thinking, assuming you can actually call it thinking.

The "wait and see" is not a good philosophy.

This gun debate here sure has shown the true colors of a few posters.

[GannonFan]

Please. That line of thinking is basically saying that while we don't think the government can go around and confiscate all the guns, really what they're missing is the list of the guns - once they get the list they can all of sudden go and get them? Again, that's just a lazy, illogical line of thinking, assuming you can actually call it thinking.

The "wait and see" is not a good philosophy.

This gun debate here sure has shown the true colors of a few posters.

But that makes no sense. Heck, if we have background checks, which even the Col is in favor of, don't you think the government would have a pretty good idea of who has the guns when they sneak in the dark of the night to take them from you? Heck, if you think they're just going to confiscate them tha same illogical thinking should then realize with background checks they can just detain everyone who has ever had a background check since they could have guns. I mean, why "wait and see" if the government is going to imprison millions of people and just be against background checks? The Col must be wrong in this then.

[grizzaholic]

The "wait and see" is not a good philosophy.

This gun debate here sure has shown the true colors of a few posters.

But that makes no sense. Heck, if we have background checks, which even the Col is in favor of, don't you think the government would have a pretty good idea of who has the guns when they sneak in the dark of the night to take them from you? Heck, if you think they're just going to confiscate them tha same illogical thinking should then realize with background checks they can just detain everyone who has ever had a background check since they could have guns. I mean, why "wait and see" if the government is going to imprison millions of people and just be against background checks? The Col must be wrong in this then.

I am pretty sure I have never, NEVER, once said I was against background checks. I just don't think person to person sales need to go through a gun dealer unless the weapon needs a tax stamp. Some of the idiotic laws that NY and other places are pushing though are just that..IDIOTIC.

I don't think I need to register my guns. NEVER. How much will this cost me yearly? I am a responsible gun owner.


Why punish the 99.?% because of the .?%?

[grizzaholic]

FUCK. I got sucked into this debate again. You won, like houndawg and Bluehenbillick (sp). You won. You know what is best for me. I don't know what is best for me because what works fine in Miami/LA/NY will also work great in Wyoming/Idaho/ND.

You win. You know what is best! I am done.

[BDKJMU]

"Assault Weapons Ban Lacks Democratic Votes to Pass Senate

A proposed ban on sales of assault weapons would be defeated in the U.S. Senate unless some lawmakers changed their current views, based on a Bloomberg review of recent lawmaker statements and interviews.

At least six of the 55 senators in the Democratic caucus have expressed skepticism or outright opposition to a ban, the review found. That means Democrats wouldn’t have a 51-vote majority to pass the measure, let alone the 60 needed to break a Republican filibuster to bring it to a floor vote....."
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-2 ... enate.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[BDKJMU]

Now I know some of those firearms are illegal in DC. DC PD should arrest that bitch for violating DC firearms laws. Course, since the city is run by donks that won't happen.

[Col Hogan]

The "wait and see" is not a good philosophy.

This gun debate here sure has shown the true colors of a few posters.

But that makes no sense. Heck, if we have background checks, which even the Col is in favor of, don't you think the government would have a pretty good idea of who has the guns when they sneak in the dark of the night to take them from you? Heck, if you think they're just going to confiscate them tha same illogical thinking should then realize with background checks they can just detain everyone who has ever had a background check since they could have guns. I mean, why "wait and see" if the government is going to imprison millions of people and just be against background checks? The Col must be wrong in this then.

Your comments here tell me that (1) you do not know how the background check system works; (2) you have not read the Feinstein bill and its backdoor confiscation methods; (3) you either reject, or refuse to learn from actions taken in other countries; and (4) you have not paid attention to what the Donks have been saying all along (or worse, you agree with them and hope I haven't paid attention)

There is so much out there on the interweb, not from the Spandex-favored conspiracy sites, but from legitimate news and information sites, on what is desired by the left...

Feinstein has clearly stated she wants confiscation...the Democrats in New York came within a hair of including confiscation in their draconian legislation...they left that as their next step...New York governor Cummore want confiscation and has an organism every-time he thinks or talks about it...even the most left Democrat Senator in New York agrees their draconian law will do nothing to prevent violence or crime...

As it stands today, the government could not confiscate 90% of the weapons in this country...without registration, the government is nearly powerless to find LEGALLY OWNED weapons...and that's the way it shall stay...

I want to stop atrocities like Newtown as much as the next person...but why do you want to come after me, when I did not commit any crime???

[houndawg]

And that is too late.

Please. That line of thinking is basically saying that while we don't think the government can go around and confiscate all the guns, really what they're missing is the list of the guns - once they get the list they can all of sudden go and get them? Again, that's just a lazy, illogical line of thinking, assuming you can actually call it thinking.

You can't reason with stupid.

[houndawg]

But that makes no sense. Heck, if we have background checks, which even the Col is in favor of, don't you think the government would have a pretty good idea of who has the guns when they sneak in the dark of the night to take them from you? Heck, if you think they're just going to confiscate them tha same illogical thinking should then realize with background checks they can just detain everyone who has ever had a background check since they could have guns. I mean, why "wait and see" if the government is going to imprison millions of people and just be against background checks? The Col must be wrong in this then.

Your comments here tell me that (1) you do not know how the background check system works; (2) you have not read the Feinstein bill and its backdoor confiscation methods; (3) you either reject, or refuse to learn from actions taken in other countries; and (4) you have not paid attention to what the Donks have been saying all along (or worse, you agree with them and hope I haven't paid attention)

There is so much out there on the interweb, not from the Spandex-favored conspiracy sites, but from legitimate news and information sites, on what is desired by the left...

Feinstein has clearly stated she wants confiscation...the Democrats in New York came within a hair of including confiscation in their draconian legislation...they left that as their next step...New York governor Cummore want confiscation and has an organism every-time he thinks or talks about it...even the most left Democrat Senator in New York agrees their draconian law will do nothing to prevent violence or crime...

As it stands today, the government could not confiscate 90% of the weapons in this country...without registration, the government is nearly powerless to find LEGALLY OWNED weapons...and that's the way it shall stay...

I want to stop atrocities like Newtown as much as the next person...but why do you want to come after me, when I did not commit any crime???

[Col Hogan]

Damn auto correct...

[Col Hogan]

[93henfan]

Very appropriate, after news out of Philly this week that an exterminator killed a young, female doctor by strangling her and burning her with a blowtorch. The media has not yet called for a ban on rope and fire.

[Col Hogan]

Very appropriate, after news out of Philly this week that an exterminator killed a young, female doctor by strangling her and burning her with a blowtorch. The media has not yet called for a ban on rope and fire.

And we know how well strict gun control works...ask the five people shot in a DC night club early this morning..

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

or these 5 shot in Chicago with Rahm Emmanuel to thank for their safety.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/27/at ... icago-day/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[CID1990]

Very appropriate, after news out of Philly this week that an exterminator killed a young, female doctor by strangling her and burning her with a blowtorch. The media has not yet called for a ban on rope and fire.

Maybe she needed killin?

[Col Hogan]

[CID1990]

Why does that cartoon have a white guy wearing saggy pants, basketball sneakers and a hoodie?

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

Because it would be racist if they made it a black guy...........

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2

[DSUrocks07]

Because it would be racist if they made it a black guy...........

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2

Even tho Hispanics wear that crap too. But everyone's first thought is that it should be a black guy.

Sent from my VM670 using Tapatalk 2

[CID1990]

Because it would be racist if they made it a black guy...........

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2

Even tho Hispanics wear that crap too. But everyone's first thought is that it should be a black guy.

Sent from my VM670 using Tapatalk 2

What a nation of preprogrammed stinky little vaginas we have become.

[DSUrocks07]

Even tho Hispanics wear that crap too. But everyone's first thought is that it should be a black guy.

Sent from my VM670 using Tapatalk 2

What a nation of preprogrammed stinky little vaginas we have become.

+1

Sent from my VM670 using Tapatalk 2

[expandspanos]

The funniest part of this Dianne Vagina Feinstein bill is this- It would allow people in government to still own these weapons- it's just the slave citizens who have to hand over their guns.

At the very same time

"The Department of Homeland Security has purchased 1.4 billion rounds of ammunition- that is not a typo -- during the last six months. This includes 450 million rounds of .40 hollow point, 200 million rounds of .223 rifle ammunition, and 176,000 rounds of .308 168-grain hollow point boat tail (HPBT) that is used almost exclusively as ammo for sniper rifles."

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/201 ... z2JIm6j4qN" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The government has bought enough ammunition to shoot every American more than 4 times- and they are at the same time disarming us.

--------------------------------------------

The "Sandy Hook" nonsense is laughable-

The story about which gun has changed time and time again- where the guns were found, which guns were used.

There was a story that "Adam Lanza went to the school and got in a confrontation with 4 staff members the day before" it was repeated over and over again- Then people said "Great, we've got the guy on the school's surveillance system" and the news then said "Oh, actually that never happened, our bad."

The school nurse- Sally Cox claimed that she knew Nancy Lanza and Adam Lanza from the school and Nancy was a very nice lady etc. etc.- Turns out Nancy never went to the school and neither did Adam- This is the same nurse who said the security system was installed "4-5 years ago" when it was installed just 2 months before the shooting.

This nurse also claimed to reporters at first that she "looked Adam Lanza in the eyes before diving under her desk" that story was later changed to "she saw his knees and feet through a hole in her desk."


Everyone inside the school were told to "close their eyes" as they were leaving- Is this standard operating proceedure?

-Not one image of any injured children at all, or people leaving the school even though the helicopter was there. Danbury hospital was expecting massive amounts of bodies brought in, and only 3 people were (allegedly) brought to the hospital- none are named, and the hospital was treated as a "fortress" with armed guards and IDs needed to enter-even though it's 7 miles from the shooting.

110LB Adam Lanza is supposedly autistic, yet at the same time skips Junior and Senior year in high school to go straight to college (so they say) yet this is the same time period in which he "goes off the grid" and nobody can find any record of him online, any pictures or videos, no financial transactions- NOTHING.

This autistic shy child suddenly turns into a sharp-shooter rambo character, hauling hundreds of rounds and 4 guns around shooting people with amazing accuracy.

There are video cameras- but of course, we don't get to see anything that happened- no explanation given for why, and no mention by media as to why we aren't being shown the film.

Reports of multiple shooters- including a man "pinned down to the ground with handcuffs on" and "a man with cammo pants and dark jacket" being handcuffed and put into the front seat of a police car never followed up on.

R.I.P. Victoria Soto Facebook page appears on the internet 4 days before the shooting happens.

"Robbie Parker" "father" of dead child is seen laughing hysterically before going on camera to beg for money through a Facebook charity account set up for his daughter the day of the shooting.

Firing off 100 rounds of ammo would be a defeaning sound echoing in the halls of the school- yet kids when they were asked if they heard shooting said "We thought the janitor was banging on the walls" another lady heard what she thought was "the janitor "taking down risers and setting up tables"

How could you confuse AR-15 fire with a janitor setting up tables?

Nothing fishy going on here.. no conspiracy to take away your gun rights move along people.. nothing to see here.

[93henfan]

How many times are you going to make the same Sandy Hook post expandos?

Yes, the story about the guns used changed, there were initial reports about a guy in camo in the woods, yada, yada, etc. That's what happens when CNN and other media outlets are breaking stories within minutes. They report everything they hear, right or wrong. That doesn't make it a conspiracy.

Jeezis.

Kate Upton is not pleased with you.

[AZGrizFan]

Firing off 100 rounds of ammo would be a defeaning sound echoing in the halls of the school- yet kids when they were asked if they heard shooting said "We thought the janitor was banging on the walls" another lady heard what she thought was "the janitor "taking down risers and setting up tables"

How could you confuse AR-15 fire with a janitor setting up tables?

Do you know how many suburbanites have NEVER heard a gun fire?