Fuck You Dianne Feinstein

[93henfan]

A couple of these just got turned in at an L.A. buy back program.




http://www.heavy.com/news/2012/12/two-r ... n-buyback/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

That pic isn't of a grenade launcher. It is an AT-4, a light anti tank weapon.
It also isn't made in the US. It is made in Sweden.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Somebody got some free gift cards without turning in a gun! They likely turned in spent tubes; essentially military garbage. Way to go LA.

[houndawg]

Feinstein is on record as wanting to confiscate from law abiding citizens ALL GUNS
That bitch is the most dangerous senator in America.
http://www.infowars.com/video-dianne-fe ... your-guns/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Dry your eyes, Nancy, they don't have the manpower or the budget to come and take your guns.

[grizzaholic]

That pic isn't of a grenade launcher. It is an AT-4, a light anti tank weapon.
It also isn't made in the US. It is made in Sweden.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Somebody got some free gift cards without turning in a gun! They likely turned in spent tubes; essentially military garbage. Way to go LA.

I was thinking the same thing. And some people wonder why Cali is beyond broke.

[CID1990]

I think Dianne should come and take them herself, rather than send guys with.... guns

[Baldy]

The stupid cunt introduced her 0% chance of passing bill today.

Feinstein calls for banning more than 150 types of firearms during dramatic press conference

WASHINGTON — California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein staged a dramatic press conference Thursday on Capitol Hill with 10 weapons at her side and unveiled legislation instituting a government ban on more than 150 types of firearms, including rifles, pistols and shotguns.

Flanked by other anti-gun liberal lawmakers, including New York Sen. Chuck Schumer and Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, Feinstein announced the introduction of the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2013.”

The legislation being pushed by Feinstein — who has long history of calling for gun bans — would prohibit the sale, transfer, importation and manufacture of certain firearms.

[Col Hogan]

It won't pass as written, but what we have is akin to death by a thousand paper cuts...

Folks like Houndpuppy say confiscation can never happen...but Feinstein's bill does just that in a quiet, back door method...

She wants all weapons registered...but I can keep it after I register it...

But when I decide to hand it onto my son, or I die...the government gets the weapon without having to pay my estate anything...

That, my friend, is confiscation...and since it is registered (if she gets her way) the government knows where it is...

I am not worried about her bill passing as written...but I am concerned that something as bad as universal background checks will be passed...

[GannonFan]

Although I'm no fan of Feinstein, at least she comes across as genuine in this and her bill, while having no chance of passing, does attempt to do something to stop the kind of events like Newtown. Obama is signing something like 24 executive orders and nothing he's doing will do anything to prevent a tragedy like that. Criticize Feinstein if you will, and there's ample ground to do it, but at least she's proposing something that could actually limit gun violence.

[Col Hogan]

Although I'm no fan of Feinstein, at least she comes across as genuine in this and her bill, while having no chance of passing, does attempt to do something to stop the kind of events like Newtown. Obama is signing something like 24 executive orders and nothing he's doing will do anything to prevent a tragedy like that. Criticize Feinstein if you will, and there's ample ground to do it, but at least she's proposing something that could actually limit gun violence.

How???

[GannonFan]

Although I'm no fan of Feinstein, at least she comes across as genuine in this and her bill, while having no chance of passing, does attempt to do something to stop the kind of events like Newtown. Obama is signing something like 24 executive orders and nothing he's doing will do anything to prevent a tragedy like that. Criticize Feinstein if you will, and there's ample ground to do it, but at least she's proposing something that could actually limit gun violence.

How???

By making a real attempt to take guns, and most guns, out of circulation. Like I said, there's certainly an argument against her's, but a measure to take guns, even pistols, out of reach is a real attempt to stem gun violence rather than the measures taken so far, by Obama included, that don't do anything in that regard while professing that they do.

[kalm]

Meanwhile, Ted Nugent, Wayne LaPierre, and rural county sheriffs across the land are making Feinsteins job easy by opening their mouths. I swear to god if any of the national gun rights "spokesmen" were half as rational and eloquent as Hoggie, CID, Grizza, or 93 on the issue, there really wouldn't be much of a debate on this.

[DSUrocks07]

How???

By making a real attempt to take guns, and most guns, out of circulation. Like I said, there's certainly an argument against her's, but a measure to take guns, even pistols, out of reach is a real attempt to stem gun violence rather than the measures taken so far, by Obama included, that don't do anything in that regard while professing that they do.

This is all about where people are willing to draw the line between liberty and safety. And those on the "safety" side are going to push the envelope as far as they can.

[HI54UNI]

How???

By making a real attempt to take guns, and most guns, out of circulation. Like I said, there's certainly an argument against her's, but a measure to take guns, even pistols, out of reach is a real attempt to stem gun violence rather than the measures taken so far, by Obama included, that don't do anything in that regard while professing that they do.

Yep it will work great because we all know that the criminals will register their guns and tell the govt that they own them.

[SDHornet]

By making a real attempt to take guns, and most guns, out of circulation. Like I said, there's certainly an argument against her's, but a measure to take guns, even pistols, out of reach is a real attempt to stem gun violence rather than the measures taken so far, by Obama included, that don't do anything in that regard while professing that they do.

Yep it will work great because we all know that the criminals will register their guns and tell the govt that they own them.

This...and no bikini pic?!?!!

[houndawg]

It won't pass as written, but what we have is akin to death by a thousand paper cuts...

Folks like Houndpuppy say confiscation can never happen...but Feinstein's bill does just that in a quiet, back door method...

She wants all weapons registered...but I can keep it after I register it...

But when I decide to hand it onto my son, or I die...the government gets the weapon without having to pay my estate anything...

That, my friend, is confiscation...and since it is registered (if she gets her way) the government knows where it is...

I am not worried about her bill passing as written...but I am concerned that something as bad as universal background checks will be passed...

300,000,000 guns. The manpower and budget simply do not exist to send cops house to house confiscating weapons. Put on a fresh Depends and relax, Sgt. Schultz.

One would think that all these freedom-loving rugged individuals would be equally as pissed off about warrantless wire taps and and drones spying on Americans and the US becoming the Surveillance Nation. Oddly enough we hear nothing from the Col. Klinks and alpacajizz1s and their lower functioning offspring like BDORKJMU who usually supply their greek chorus of sniveling and whimpering.

[HI54UNI]

Yep it will work great because we all know that the criminals will register their guns and tell the govt that they own them.

This...and no bikini pic?!?!!

Sorry.

[bluehenbillk]

I see absolutely nothing wrong with having to register guns. Why not just treat them like automobiles, you have a license, you have to pay a registration fee, heck it's another way to help states reduce their debt.

[mrklean]

Although I'm no fan of Feinstein, at least she comes across as genuine in this and her bill, while having no chance of passing, does attempt to do something to stop the kind of events like Newtown. Obama is signing something like 24 executive orders and nothing he's doing will do anything to prevent a tragedy like that. Criticize Feinstein if you will, and there's ample ground to do it, but at least she's proposing something that could actually limit gun violence.

Most of the American Public cant face the fact that their are some really really sick and evil people in our country. This is the price we pay for living in a free county. I would rather be able to protect my family and not wait for the police.

[CitadelGrad]

I see absolutely nothing wrong with having to register guns. Why not just treat them like automobiles, you have a license, you have to pay a registration fee, heck it's another way to help states reduce their debt.

Driving a car is not a constitutional right. That's the difference.

I can think of another way for states to reduce their debt. Reduce spending.

[Col Hogan]

I see absolutely nothing wrong with having to register guns. Why not just treat them like automobiles, you have a license, you have to pay a registration fee, heck it's another way to help states reduce their debt.

Plus the whole Constitutional right issue...drivers licenses are a privilege , not a right

[GannonFan]

But requiring registration of a gun, without charging for the registration, could pass the Constitutional muster. Certainly would fit in the "well regulated" language there as well.

[Col Hogan]

But requiring registration of a gun, without charging for the registration, could pass the Constitutional muster. Certainly would fit in the "well regulated" language there as well.

Registration...then confiscation...

No thanks...I agree with background checks during any sale other than private sales...stronger mental health information collection...and total enforcement of the hundreds of existing gun laws...

[Col Hogan]

It won't pass as written, but what we have is akin to death by a thousand paper cuts...

Folks like Houndpuppy say confiscation can never happen...but Feinstein's bill does just that in a quiet, back door method...

She wants all weapons registered...but I can keep it after I register it...

But when I decide to hand it onto my son, or I die...the government gets the weapon without having to pay my estate anything...

That, my friend, is confiscation...and since it is registered (if she gets her way) the government knows where it is...

I am not worried about her bill passing as written...but I am concerned that something as bad as universal background checks will be passed...

300,000,000 guns. The manpower and budget simply do not exist to send cops house to house confiscating weapons. Put on a fresh Depends and relax, Sgt. Schultz.

One would think that all these freedom-loving rugged individuals would be equally as pissed off about warrantless wire taps and and drones spying on Americans and the US becoming the Surveillance Nation. Oddly enough we hear nothing from the Col. Klinks and alpacajizz1s and their lower functioning offspring like BDORKJMU who usually supply their greek chorus of sniveling and whimpering.

Dawg...my one hope when 0bama was elected was that he would end/kill the Patriot Act (I puke a little just calling it that)...

He has done little that really pissed me off...lots I don't like, but little to piss me off...

But once he really got to like the power the Patriot Act gave him, he made it worse and that really honked me off...

So, go back to playing your fiddle because I've said lots about the erosion of our freedoms under Bush and 0bama... You just have a convenient way of tuning it out...

Kinda like you ignored what I said about back door confiscation and went into your rap...by the way, each time you post about the number of guns, it grows...

[grizzaholic]

300,000,000 guns. The manpower and budget simply do not exist to send cops house to house confiscating weapons. Put on a fresh Depends and relax, Sgt. Schultz.

One would think that all these freedom-loving rugged individuals would be equally as pissed off about warrantless wire taps and and drones spying on Americans and the US becoming the Surveillance Nation. Oddly enough we hear nothing from the Col. Klinks and alpacajizz1s and their lower functioning offspring like BDORKJMU who usually supply their greek chorus of sniveling and whimpering.

Dawg...my one hope when 0bama was elected was that he would end/kill the Patriot Act (I puke a little just calling it that)...

He has done little that really pissed me off...lots I don't like, but little to piss me off...

But once he really got to like the power the Patriot Act gave him, he made it worse and that really honked me off...

So, go back to playing your fiddle because I've said lots about the erosion of our freedoms under Bush and 0bama... You just have a convenient way of tuning it out...

Kinda like you ignored what I said about back door confiscation and went into your rap...by the way, each time you post about the number of guns, it grows...

Col, you cannot reason with stupid.

[GannonFan]

But requiring registration of a gun, without charging for the registration, could pass the Constitutional muster. Certainly would fit in the "well regulated" language there as well.

Registration...then confiscation...

No thanks...I agree with background checks during any sale other than private sales...stronger mental health information collection...and total enforcement of the hundreds of existing gun laws...

Well, I'd deal with the confiscation when that comes up - the whole line of thinking that you need to stop some supposed long term scheme several steps before that actual thing that concerns you is just a load of tripe. Frankly. Your lack of faith in your country is disturbing.

But beyond that, if you're already for background checks, I assume on new sales only, wouldn't you think that would already work like a registration anyway? Surely there would be some record of the check and the reason for it (i.e. what type of gun). The government surely wouldn't throw away the record of the background check.

As for the background checks, why are you for background checks on public sales but against them on private sales? Why leave the loophole for people who wouldn't pass the public background check?

[grizzaholic]

Well, I'd deal with the confiscation when that comes up -

And that is too late.