Height?LumberJackie wrote:I am a girlkalm wrote:
Unless you're talking about his avatar, which is mildly entertaining...
Weight?
Time in the 40 yard dash?

Height?LumberJackie wrote:I am a girlkalm wrote:
Unless you're talking about his avatar, which is mildly entertaining...

BOOM! In your face 2506!SloStang wrote:just thought I would point out that Cal Poly beat Wyoming this year at 7,220 feet. Carry on.cats2506 wrote: So you need to hope for a sealevel running team playing at 7000 feet against one of the better rushing defenses in the conf,
Heh. Makes me glad someone else was paying attention and caught these doozies, jacksdude109. NAU may be in the running for the uneducated fanbase award. My only explanation is new fans usually are clueless. Belittling them won't solve anything..... calmly explaining the facts will. Lumberjacks fans are few and far between so I won't chase them away. The "bowl game" comment did make me laugh, though.jacksdude0109 wrote:the nau athletics fb page posted an article about nau losing to oregon in bball and some ¨fan¨ commented ¨ya but at least we could beat asu at football.¨ right the only problem is we already played them and lost 63-6. then during the game on fox sports, some idiot from a satellite campus sent in an email that was read during the broadcast. the email said that he was a 57 year old freshman and he was thinking about coming out for the team.later on in the broadcast somebody else emailed in inquiring about our chances at a bowl game.
now dont get me wrong, i know a handful of GREAT nau football fans(close friends), but my god do we have the most uneducated fans in the world?

oceanvue?mtjack wrote:Heh. Makes me glad someone else was paying attention and caught these doozies, jacksdude109. NAU may be in the running for the uneducated fanbase award. My only explanation is new fans usually are clueless. Belittling them won't solve anything..... calmly explaining the facts will. Lumberjacks fans are few and far between so I won't chase them away. The "bowl game" comment did make me laugh, though.jacksdude0109 wrote:the nau athletics fb page posted an article about nau losing to oregon in bball and some ¨fan¨ commented ¨ya but at least we could beat asu at football.¨ right the only problem is we already played them and lost 63-6. then during the game on fox sports, some idiot from a satellite campus sent in an email that was read during the broadcast. the email said that he was a 57 year old freshman and he was thinking about coming out for the team.later on in the broadcast somebody else emailed in inquiring about our chances at a bowl game.
now dont get me wrong, i know a handful of GREAT nau football fans(close friends), but my god do we have the most uneducated fans in the world?
Mitch Strohman or Kevin Stephens made a comment on the tv/radio coverage that Bauman had strep throat last week. Kind of surprised he was on the field at all. Backup rb's - Deboskie and Jahn - must have been dinged up as well as they only tallied two carries. Bauman just wasn't successful but NAU kept going to him. Injuries, illnesses and a beat up offensive line mixed in with a fired up SUU defense and, well, it was sadly what I expected. Take away the one blown special teams play (blocked punt) and NAU wins. Special teams play has long lasting effects on the game's outcome. Shore that up and don't turn it over three times (a season high if I'm correct?) and it's a whole different ballgame.jacksdude0109 wrote:also my thoughts on saturdays game. this has to be the biggest game played in the dome in years, hoping for a good turnout. i really thought zach bauman looked slow against suu and i heard he was banged up along with a few other players. i feel like if our team is a little more healthy and we dont give up any blocked punts or stupid plays, then we have a decent shot. now if we lose this game, i dont think we make the playoffs. we have one win against a high school team and losing two straight to good teams at home is going to be hard to overlook, especially with our history of late season collapses. i dont think i have been so nervous for an nau game in a long time. go jacks

Grizalltheway wrote:oceanvue?mtjack wrote:
Heh. Makes me glad someone else was paying attention and caught these doozies, jacksdude109. NAU may be in the running for the uneducated fanbase award. My only explanation is new fans usually are clueless. Belittling them won't solve anything..... calmly explaining the facts will. Lumberjacks fans are few and far between so I won't chase them away. The "bowl game" comment did make me laugh, though.

cats2506 wrote: I doubt it will come down to Sagrin anyway (which MSU will own) because CP will get rolled at 7000 ft, which thorows it to common opponents, which is SUU

FIFYcats2506 wrote:serves me right for being a dipsh*t
Nice, you squeaked by PSU today and got the auto bid after CP came through for youScreamin_Eagle174 wrote:FIFYcats2506 wrote:serves me right for being a dipsh*t

Only in your mind.cats2506 wrote:Nice, you squeaked by PSU today and got the auto bid after CP came through for youScreamin_Eagle174 wrote:
FIFY
It will still be fun to watch the show tomorrow, Cats are in a good position.
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Only in your mind.cats2506 wrote:
Nice, you squeaked by PSU today and got the auto bid after CP came through for you
It will still be fun to watch the show tomorrow, Cats are in a good position.
EWU: 9-2 D-I, wins over an FBS, and two ranked teams... the other two "co-champs."
MSU: 9-1 D-I, no wins over ranked teams, loss to EWU head to head.
Seems like a pretty easy decision for the committee.

Drake vs. Wazzucats2506 wrote:Screamin_Eagle174 wrote: Only in your mind.
EWU: 9-2 D-I, wins over an FBS, and two ranked teams... the other two "co-champs."
MSU: 9-1 D-I, no wins over ranked teams, loss to EWU head to head.
Seems like a pretty easy decision for the committee.
9-1 = .9
9-2 = .82
.9 > .82
So in essence your argument is that EWU will be penalized for playing 2 FBS's, while MSU will be rewarded for playing a Division II?cats2506 wrote:Screamin_Eagle174 wrote: Only in your mind.
EWU: 9-2 D-I, wins over an FBS, and two ranked teams... the other two "co-champs."
MSU: 9-1 D-I, no wins over ranked teams, loss to EWU head to head.
Seems like a pretty easy decision for the committee.
9-1 = .9
9-2 = .82
.9 > .82
Who's to say that MSU wouldn't have gotten an additional loss if they had played an all Division I schedule?


hey dumb****, you still on this forum? ya bauman looked like he had great respect for souers today didnt he? or were you even aware nau had a game today? dipshitNAUJacks wrote:Oh and by the way don't disrespect Bauman by dissin the Coach he has great respect for. Take his picture off your posts your jack ass.


mmmmm... yes tell me moreNAUJacks wrote:The team is 7-1 and they are practicing and playing with a great attitude. STF up about the coach and be a true fan and watch and enjoy this special season.
And as far as the other teams they may have had talent but they never finished. They also didnt have the right attitude or commitment.This team has a chip on their shoulder and they are tough MF's.
Sure NAU had talent before but they never performed up to their potential. Stop blaming the Fuc&in Coach man. And by the way where wer you before the season started?

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:It's too bad NAUJackieParty won't be showing her face around here again. It was fun pushing her idiocy to new levels.

and there ya have it. any lumberjokes(jackparty, oceanvue,lumberjackie) out there care to comment?jacksdude0109 wrote:we havent proven ANYTHING yet.
Not that it matters at this point other than to prove that you had no clue, but about those "spots" on the Sagrin ranking, it looks like I was dead onScreamin_Eagle174 wrote:EWU is 5 spots higher in the Sagarin. And I guarantee we'll beat UCD by more than 7... they've appeared to ship it in for the year. MSU would also have to beat UM by more than 6, which would be a tall task, as the Griz will probably win by more than 6. Enjoy the cat trap in Missoula!

Whatever helps you feel better about yourself after being wrong almost all the time. How did that autobid work out for ya?cats2506 wrote:Not that it matters at this point other than to prove that you had no clue, but about those "spots" on the Sagrin ranking, it looks like I was dead onScreamin_Eagle174 wrote:EWU is 5 spots higher in the Sagarin. And I guarantee we'll beat UCD by more than 7... they've appeared to ship it in for the year. MSU would also have to beat UM by more than 6, which would be a tall task, as the Griz will probably win by more than 6. Enjoy the cat trap in Missoula!![]()
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc12.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It looks like you are 4 "spots" back, which is about 1.6 rating points
We don't need a bunch of fancy rankings to tell us that EWU beat MSU... EWU is THE Big Sky Champs this year.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Whatever helps you feel better about yourself after being wrong almost all the time. How did that autobid work out for ya?cats2506 wrote:
Not that it matters at this point other than to prove that you had no clue, but about those "spots" on the Sagrin ranking, it looks like I was dead on![]()
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc12.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It looks like you are 4 "spots" back, which is about 1.6 rating points