Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

[SeattleGriz]

I'm waiting for the list of all the prostitutes. You don't even know that, which is obvious with your, "mommy! He did it too" reasoning.

What do you call people he paid "for engaging in sexual activity with him"?

IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGATIONS RELATING TO REPRESENTATIVE MATT GAETZ

In sum, the Committee found substantial evidence of the following:

• From at least 2017 to 2020, Representative Gaetz regularly paid women for engaging in sexual activity with him.
• In 2017, Representative Gaetz engaged in sexual activity with a 17-year-old girl.
• During the period 2017 to 2019, Representative Gaetz used or possessed illegal drugs, including cocaine and ecstasy, on multiple occasions.
• Representative Gaetz accepted gifts, including transportation and lodging in connection with a 2018 trip to the Bahamas, in excess of permissible amounts.
• In 2018, Representative Gaetz arranged for his Chief of Staff to assist a woman with whom he engaged in sexual activity in obtaining a passport, falsely indicating to the U.S. Department of State that she was a constituent.
• Representative Gaetz knowingly and willfully sought to impede and obstruct the Committee’s investigation of his conduct.
• Representative Gaetz has acted in a manner that reflects discreditably upon the House.

A 35 year old man paying a 17 year old for sex regardless of whether he knew she was 17 is a violation of Florida's statuatory rape laws. They'd prosecute him if he were a Democrat.

He's a paragon of virtue and family values.

Why do you continue to defend a sexual deviant?

Do you know how a committee works? They listen to guys like Greenberg, whom not only is in jail for having sex with underage women, but also found to lack credibility by the DOJ. The DOJ, but yes, you keep believing you've really got the inside scoop.

[UNI88]

What do you call people he paid "for engaging in sexual activity with him"?

IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGATIONS RELATING TO REPRESENTATIVE MATT GAETZ

A 35 year old man paying a 17 year old for sex regardless of whether he knew she was 17 is a violation of Florida's statuatory rape laws. They'd prosecute him if he were a Democrat.

He's a paragon of virtue and family values.

Why do you continue to defend a sexual deviant?

Do you know how a committee works? They listen to guys like Greenberg, whom not only is in jail for having sex with underage women, but also found to lack credibility by the DOJ. The DOJ, but yes, you keep believing you've really got the inside scoop.

Do you know how the criminal justice system works? Just because the DoJ didn't find enough to prosecute doesn't mean nothing happened or that gaetz is innocent. The committee listened to more people then just greenberg, why are you attempting to focus only on his role in the report?

gaetz is a paragon of virtue and family values.

Why do you continue to defend a sexual deviant?

[SeattleGriz]

Do you know how a committee works? They listen to guys like Greenberg, whom not only is in jail for having sex with underage women, but also found to lack credibility by the DOJ. The DOJ, but yes, you keep believing you've really got the inside scoop.

Do you know how the criminal justice system works? Just because the DoJ didn't find enough to prosecute doesn't mean nothing happened or that gaetz is innocent. The committee listened to more people then just greenberg, why are you attempting to focus only on his role in the report?

gaetz is a paragon of virtue and family values.

Why do you continue to defend a sexual deviant?

I've given you multiple opportunities to prove these things you say, but as usual, you just keep throwing shit on a wall. Pathetic.

Once again with the "just because". Reeeeee!

[UNI88]

Do you know how the criminal justice system works? Just because the DoJ didn't find enough to prosecute doesn't mean nothing happened or that gaetz is innocent. The committee listened to more people then just greenberg, why are you attempting to focus only on his role in the report?

gaetz is a paragon of virtue and family values.

Why do you continue to defend a sexual deviant?

I've given you multiple opportunities to prove these things you say, but as usual, you just keep throwing shit on a wall. Pathetic.

Once again with the "just because". Reeeeee!

This is a message board, I don't have to prove shit.

The irony of you asking me to prove something after you've pushed trump's bullshit about stolen elections and probably more without proof while saying nothing about the unproven rumors and innuendo spread on here about biden, harris, etc. is rich indeed.

[Caribbean Hen]

I've given you multiple opportunities to prove these things you say, but as usual, you just keep throwing shit on a wall. Pathetic.

Once again with the "just because". Reeeeee!

This is a message board, I don't have to prove shit.

The irony of you asking me to prove something after you've pushed trump's bullshit about stolen elections and probably more without proof while saying nothing about the unproven rumors and innuendo spread on here about biden, harris, etc. is rich indeed.

Something was different about the 2020 election

Knew something was up watching Biden campaigning down in his basement …. They knew it was in the bag

Nobody liked him

[UNI88]

This is a message board, I don't have to prove shit.

The irony of you asking me to prove something after you've pushed trump's bullshit about stolen elections and probably more without proof while saying nothing about the unproven rumors and innuendo spread on here about biden, harris, etc. is rich indeed.

Something was different about the 2020 election

Knew something was up watching Biden campaigning down in his basement …. They knew it was in the bag

Nobody liked him

Something was different about the 2016 election too. There is just as much if not more "evidence" that the 2016 election was stolen then there is that the 2020 election was stolen. Sensitive snowflake MAQA yahoos get their panties all in a bunch for opposite reasons over both of them.

[SeattleGriz]

I've given you multiple opportunities to prove these things you say, but as usual, you just keep throwing shit on a wall. Pathetic.

Once again with the "just because". Reeeeee!

This is a message board, I don't have to prove shit.

The irony of you asking me to prove something after you've pushed trump's bullshit about stolen elections and probably more without proof while saying nothing about the unproven rumors and innuendo spread on here about biden, harris, etc. is rich indeed.

You apparently haven't been paying attention. In regards to the 2020 election, I've pointed out that NO ONE has been independently allowed a true forensic audit to validate if there was enough slop to sway an election.

Georgia is a prime example. State Supreme Court said the investigative groups had standing, but they still wouldn't turn over ballots and images.

You latch onto unproven narratives and refuse to understand you've only heard one side of the story. There are three sides to the "truth". My side, your side and the actual truth. No one has been allowed to get to the bottom of the real truth.

The closest they got was the AZ audit, but shenanigans by the elections officials prevented resolution. They got as far as the ballots did match the tabulator count, but were then prevented from determining where the actual ballots came from. For example, when Cyber Ninjas asked to interview homes that submitted 75 ballots for a residence of four (example scenario), they were denied because it would "scare" the voters.

[UNI88]

This is a message board, I don't have to prove shit.

The irony of you asking me to prove something after you've pushed trump's bullshit about stolen elections and probably more without proof while saying nothing about the unproven rumors and innuendo spread on here about biden, harris, etc. is rich indeed.

You apparently haven't been paying attention. In regards to the 2020 election, I've pointed out that NO ONE has been independently allowed a true forensic audit to validate if there was enough slop to sway an election.

Georgia is a prime example. State Supreme Court said the investigative groups had standing, but they still wouldn't turn over ballots and images.

You latch onto unproven narratives and refuse to understand you've only heard one side of the story. There are three sides to the "truth". My side, your side and the actual truth. No one has been allowed to get to the bottom of the real truth.

The closest they got was the AZ audit, but shenanigans by the elections officials prevented resolution. They got as far as the ballots did match the tabulator count, but were then prevented from determining where the actual ballots came from. For example, when Cyber Ninjas asked to interview homes that submitted 75 ballots for a residence of four (example scenario), they were denied because it would "scare" the voters.

I've given you multiple opportunities to prove these things you say, but as usual, you just keep throwing shit on a wall. Pathetic.

Once again with the "just because". Reeeeee!

[Caribbean Hen]

"Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced Monday he intends to resign from his post but will stay until a new leader of the country's Liberal Party is in place, effectively ending nine years of power.

Trudeau's departure comes amid mounting pressure for him to step aside before an upcoming election that his Liberal Party is forecasted to lose badly. The leader also has a complicated, oft-adversarial relationship with U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, who is set to be sworn in later this month."

what a pus

[Bobcat]

The new leader will leave Canadians begging for Trudeau, hes going to be the biggest liberal POS ever holding office. This new POS will finish the job

[Caribbean Hen]

You apparently haven't been paying attention. In regards to the 2020 election, I've pointed out that NO ONE has been independently allowed a true forensic audit to validate if there was enough slop to sway an election.

Georgia is a prime example. State Supreme Court said the investigative groups had standing, but they still wouldn't turn over ballots and images.

You latch onto unproven narratives and refuse to understand you've only heard one side of the story. There are three sides to the "truth". My side, your side and the actual truth. No one has been allowed to get to the bottom of the real truth.

The closest they got was the AZ audit, but shenanigans by the elections officials prevented resolution. They got as far as the ballots did match the tabulator count, but were then prevented from determining where the actual ballots came from. For example, when Cyber Ninjas asked to interview homes that submitted 75 ballots for a residence of four (example scenario), they were denied because it would "scare" the voters.

I've given you multiple opportunities to prove these things you say, but as usual, you just keep throwing shit on a wall. Pathetic.

Once again with the "just because". Reeeeee!

“This is a message board, I don't have to prove shit”

TDS 88

[UNI88]

I've given you multiple opportunities to prove these things you say, but as usual, you just keep throwing shit on a wall. Pathetic.

Once again with the "just because". Reeeeee!

“This is a message board, I don't have to prove shit”

TDS 88

Thank you for using my response to SeattleDARVO to help highlight MAQA yahoo hypocrisy when it comes to when proof is required vs when rumors and innuendo are acceptable.

[BDKJMU]

All over the liberal twittersphere with liberals claiming lack of class, rAciSm, and sexism.

He had a cane in one hand, and a bible in the other. How the fuck was he suppose to shake her hand? My god liberals are so fucking retarded.

[UNI88]

All over the liberal twittersphere with liberals claiming lack of class, rAciSm, and sexism.

He had a cane in one hand, and a bible in the other. How the fuck was he suppose to shake her hand? My god liberals are so fucking retarded.

What did he do when Senator Fisher took the bible from him?

MAQA Gives ‘Real Reason’ for Kamala Snub by Senator’s Hubby

even when Fischer took the Bible, her husband put his free hand in his pocket instead

“He’s old. And if it was on purpose, he’s rude,” a commenter wrote. “I’m conservative, and even I can acknowledge this is a tough day for Kamala, and she’s doing her job gracefully.”

What's classier after losing an election? Certifying the election results and swearing in elected members or inciting a seditious riot?

[Bobcat]

Trump did neither

Russia!

Russian agent!!

Steele Dossier!!!

JAN 6TH!!!!!

RUSSIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[SeattleGriz]

Keep trying to point out to the usual suspects that anonymous sources equals propaganda, but they don't listen.

[SeattleGriz]

All over the liberal twittersphere with liberals claiming lack of class, rAciSm, and sexism.

He had a cane in one hand, and a bible in the other. How the fuck was he suppose to shake her hand? My god liberals are so fucking retarded.

What did he do when Senator Fisher took the bible from him?

MAQA Gives ‘Real Reason’ for Kamala Snub by Senator’s Hubby

even when Fischer took the Bible, her husband put his free hand in his pocket instead

“He’s old. And if it was on purpose, he’s rude,” a commenter wrote. “I’m conservative, and even I can acknowledge this is a tough day for Kamala, and she’s doing her job gracefully.”

What's classier after losing an election? Certifying the election results and swearing in elected members or inciting a seditious riot?

Then why hasn't anyone been charged with insurrection?

You keep racking up the L's but have no intellectual honesty, so you keep doing it. Shameful.

[UNI88]

What did he do when Senator Fisher took the bible from him?

MAQA Gives ‘Real Reason’ for Kamala Snub by Senator’s Hubby

What's classier after losing an election? Certifying the election results and swearing in elected members or inciting a seditious riot?

Then why hasn't anyone been charged with insurrection?

You keep racking up the L's but have no intellectual honesty, so you keep doing it. Shameful.

WTF are you even talking about?

You might need to spend more time with your therapist about these anger issues.

[SeattleGriz]

Then why hasn't anyone been charged with insurrection?

You keep racking up the L's but have no intellectual honesty, so you keep doing it. Shameful.

WTF are you even talking about?

You might need to spend more time with your therapist about these anger issues.

You keep saying that Trump fomented a seditious insurrection, but nobody tasked with investigating or prosecuting has even mentioned and insurrection, in addition to the majority of Americans elected Trump, so they don't buy it either. Old and tired reasoning.

[UNI88]

WTF are you even talking about?

You might need to spend more time with your therapist about these anger issues.

You keep saying that Trump fomented a seditious insurrection, but nobody tasked with investigating or prosecuting has even mentioned and insurrection, in addition to the majority of Americans elected Trump, so they don't buy it either. Old and tired reasoning.

Where did I say that trump fomented a seditious insurrection? I will freely admit to frequently stating that trump fomented a seditious riot which is a reasonable description

trump received less than 50% of the vote, that is not a majority. And he received that percentage of votes running against a bad candidate. His winning was just as much if not more of an indictment of harris/biden then it was an indication that people didn't buy trump's misdeeds. trump is not loved or even liked by the majority of this country. He was seen as the lesser of 2 evils which is consistent with the previous 2 elections.

[SeattleGriz]

You keep saying that Trump fomented a seditious insurrection, but nobody tasked with investigating or prosecuting has even mentioned and insurrection, in addition to the majority of Americans elected Trump, so they don't buy it either. Old and tired reasoning.

Where did I say that trump fomented a seditious insurrection? I will freely admit to frequently stating that trump fomented a seditious riot which is a reasonable description

trump received less than 50% of the vote, that is not a majority. And he received that percentage of votes running against a bad candidate. His winning was just as much if not more of an indictment of harris/biden then it was an indication that people didn't buy trump's misdeeds. trump is not loved or even liked by the majority of this country. He was seen as the lesser of 2 evils which is consistent with the previous 2 elections.

Take a look at the polling on how many think Trump fomented a seditious riot. You are well in the minority. Bluesky nut job level.

[UNI88]

Where did I say that trump fomented a seditious insurrection? I will freely admit to frequently stating that trump fomented a seditious riot which is a reasonable description

trump received less than 50% of the vote, that is not a majority. And he received that percentage of votes running against a bad candidate. His winning was just as much if not more of an indictment of harris/biden then it was an indication that people didn't buy trump's misdeeds. trump is not loved or even liked by the majority of this country. He was seen as the lesser of 2 evils which is consistent with the previous 2 elections.

Take a look at the polling on how many think Trump fomented a seditious riot. You are well in the minority. Bluesky nut job level.

Show me the polling where they specifically asked people if they "think trump fomented a seditious riot".

Do people place as high of a priority on the seditious riot as they did after it happened? No. 4 years of a horrendous biden/harris administration changed people's priorities. They didn't change the history of what was actually done and said on and immediately after January 6, 2021.

More importantly, I don't give a shit about the polling. I know what was said and what happened. I'm entitled to my opinion.

Did trump foment the crowd that turned into a mob and riot? Yes. "Peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard" doesn't erase "we fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore".

Was it seditious? Merriam Webster defines sedition as "incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority". The January 6 riot definitely meets that definition.

Your defending and deflecting for every trump misdeed doesn't mean they didn't happen or weren't relevant no matter how hard you suck the fromunda cheese from his sagging, wrinkled ballsack.

[SeattleGriz]

Take a look at the polling on how many think Trump fomented a seditious riot. You are well in the minority. Bluesky nut job level.

Show me the polling where they specifically asked people if they "think trump fomented a seditious riot".

Do people place as high of a priority on the seditious riot as they did after it happened? No. 4 years of a horrendous biden/harris administration changed people's priorities. They didn't change the history of what was actually done and said on and immediately after January 6, 2021.

More importantly, I don't give a shit about the polling. I know what was said and what happened. I'm entitled to my opinion.

Did trump foment the crowd that turned into a mob and riot? Yes. "Peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard" doesn't erase "we fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore".

Was it seditious? Merriam Webster defines sedition as "incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority". The January 6 riot definitely meets that definition.

Your defending and deflecting for every trump misdeed doesn't mean they didn't happen or weren't relevant no matter how hard you suck the fromunda cheese from his sagging, wrinkled ballsack.

Holy Munchausen syndrome by proxy.

[UNI88]

Show me the polling where they specifically asked people if they "think trump fomented a seditious riot".

Do people place as high of a priority on the seditious riot as they did after it happened? No. 4 years of a horrendous biden/harris administration changed people's priorities. They didn't change the history of what was actually done and said on and immediately after January 6, 2021.

More importantly, I don't give a shit about the polling. I know what was said and what happened. I'm entitled to my opinion.

Did trump foment the crowd that turned into a mob and riot? Yes. "Peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard" doesn't erase "we fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore".

Was it seditious? Merriam Webster defines sedition as "incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority". The January 6 riot definitely meets that definition.

Your defending and deflecting for every trump misdeed doesn't mean they didn't happen or weren't relevant no matter how hard you suck the fromunda cheese from his sagging, wrinkled ballsack.

Holy Munchausen syndrome by proxy.

That's a strange way to say that you have nothing.

[Bobcat]

Then why hasn't anyone been charged with insurrection?

You keep racking up the L's but have no intellectual honesty, so you keep doing it. Shameful.

WTF are you even talking about?

You might need to spend more time with your therapist about these anger issues.

Why should he listen to anything a sexual predator like you has to say?