SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:57 pm
UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 6:42 pm
Thank you Mr. Sycophant.
Your 9:1 ratio seems overly simplistic. Is it based solely on artillery advantage or does it include other factors like:
- Control of the airspace. I would guess that the country with the superior artillery typically controls the airspace
- The impact of new technology like drones.
I'm sure I'm missing other important factors but I don't think the russian artillery advantage is overcoming their other issues enough for a 9:1 ratio.
Take away your artillery advantage 9:1 ratio and how are you determining that russia is pounding the snot out of Ukraine? Let's see some links to your sources. You like to summarily dismiss sources that you disagree with but are reluctant to put your own sources out there for review and criticism. Why is that?
I covered this previously in this thread. Pay attention son. Russia has a 9:1 advantage in artillery and the advantage of almost endless supplies of inventory. As to urban fighting among the mercenaries, probably close to 1:1, but 70% of this war is artillery.
That works out to around 7:1. Still a huge advantage.
To believe the "experts" from Newsweek and Yahoo as if they had special access to Russian captured land, in which they meticulously inventoried dead Rooskies, stretches incredulity.
You don't believe any source that you don't agree with unless they have access to the battlefields and are able to count every single dead body? And you want me to believe your estimates based solely on ratios from past wars?
You're ignoring russia's inability to control airspace and the impact of drones and as usual, you didn't provide any links to back up your statements.
The Newsweek article used russian estimates of Ukrainian equipment losses and Ukrainian estimates of russian equipment losses. Not perfect but at least they didn't pull it out of their asshole like MAQA yahoos do.
Yahoo didn't write the article. I've tried to explain to you that they're an aggregator but you're too smitten with putin to get it. They write some of their own stuff but a lot of it is pulled from other sites. That article was from the CBC and written by someone who has been boots on the ground in Afghanistan. It also seems pretty balanced giving russia credit for rebounding faster than expected. You would know that if you had actually read it and not dismissed it out of hand. Maybe you shouldn't accuse others of things that you're guilty of.