Had to break my reply up. Russia collusion was non existent and then they tried to get Trump with obstructing a non existent crime. They all knew it was bullshit. There was no predicate and it was obvious to the majority of the regular people, but especially the gang of eight, special counsel and DOJ.UNI88 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 7:49 amAre you arguing that:SeattleGriz wrote:
How many tries are you going to give the establishment? They were incapable of finding anything with their Russia collusion and other hilariously weak investigations...but now they've got him!
1) January 6 didn’t happen, that it was a peaceful protest by tourists, or that trump had nothing to do with it?
2) it’s okay to attempt to replace duly selected slates of electors with slates of fraudulent electors?
3) trump didn’t knowingly obstruct the return of documents belonging to the US government?
Russia collusion was flimsy as hell. The charges against him now are more substantial and the evidence is much stronger.
But even if he’s convicted, you’ll write it off to lawfare or some other excuse. trump is always making excuses and blaming others for his misdeeds. When was the last time he held himself responsible for something negative?
What was their goal? To remove Trump from the Presidency and you blow it off as no big deal. Absolutely stunning how you feel about that level of Lawfare.
Obama got caught spying on Trump, Hillary made up the Russian lie and the DOJ instigated an investigation without a predicate. But yes, none of that sort of horseshit is happening now.