And now 3 1/4 years ago, ending with Flynn, charges dropped.Skjellyfetti wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 12:12 pmThread was born ~2.5 years ago.GannonFan wrote:
Depends on the state - could abort this thing up to and even after birth if it makes sense.
Started with Flynn... who hasn't been sentenced yet.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/drops- ... mo-releaseThe case has come at an enormous cost for the retired three-star Army lieutenant general and his family, as he racked up millions of dollars in legal bills, was forced to sell his house, lost his job and saw his reputation sullied.
Attorney Sidney Powell told Fox News last week that Flynn paid her first law firm, Covington & Burling, approximately $3.5 million. The total amount of Flynn’s legal bills was unclear, but reports suggested last year that he had more than $4.6 million in unpaid legal bills at that time.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
Thanks man.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:35 pmNice callSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 6:26 am I would be shocked if Flynn's case didn't get dropped. Too much wierdness with Contreras recusing himself because he knew FBI agent Strzok AND the fact the new judge has ordered Mueller to turn over all documents that may help Flynn, to his attornies.
As for Manafort, they better fucking throw Podesta in jail with him, he was lobbying right beside him in the Ukraine.
Funny how Podesta filed paperwork he hadn't in years right before the indictments on Manafort. It's almost as if he was tipped off.
I'm willing to bet there are boat loads of jellybelly posts that didn't age well.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:52 pmAnd now 3 1/4 years ago, ending with Flynn, charges dropped.Skjellyfetti wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 12:12 pm
Thread was born ~2.5 years ago.
Started with Flynn... who hasn't been sentenced yet.
Now is the time to point, laugh, and humiliate anyone that pushed this broke dick Trump Russia collusion hoax (looking at you jelly). The transcripts will reveal that a lot, if not all, of this stuff was pushed knowing it was total bullshit.HI54UNI wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 12:58 pm Think about this -
Flynn charges are what started the Russian collusion BS. No Flynn charges likely means no Mueller special counsel. Without the Mueller investigation does the House switch to being Democrat controlled? No D house means no impeachment and all the other crap that has happened the last two years.
I thought Mueller said that Trump would have been indicted if he weren't holding office?
Indicted for what?
All the way to the top. Shocker.CID1990 wrote: ↑Sun May 10, 2020 5:14 pm https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/05/ ... narrative/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://justthenews.com/accountability/ ... -dni-jamesClapper’s denial conflicts with earlier congressional testimony provided by former FBI Director James Comey. According to Comey’s March 2017 account, he briefed Clapper on the Flynn-Kislyak calls and then gave the former DNI copies of the transcripts, as he requested.
“In the first week of January,” said Comey, Clapper “briefed the President and the Vice President and then President Obama's senior team about what we had found.”
Comey’s testimony squares with the account of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. In his 2019 book “The Threat,” McCabe writes that after an analyst shared the information with him, he “shared it with Comey; Comey shared it with the director of national intelligence, James Clapper; and Clapper verbally briefed it to President Obama.”
Boy Clapper must have a golden assSDHornet wrote:Sounds like Clapper might be feeling some heat:https://justthenews.com/accountability/ ... -dni-jamesClapper’s denial conflicts with earlier congressional testimony provided by former FBI Director James Comey. According to Comey’s March 2017 account, he briefed Clapper on the Flynn-Kislyak calls and then gave the former DNI copies of the transcripts, as he requested.
“In the first week of January,” said Comey, Clapper “briefed the President and the Vice President and then President Obama's senior team about what we had found.”
Comey’s testimony squares with the account of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. In his 2019 book “The Threat,” McCabe writes that after an analyst shared the information with him, he “shared it with Comey; Comey shared it with the director of national intelligence, James Clapper; and Clapper verbally briefed it to President Obama.”
Per John Solomon's website, you know the guy jelly claimed was wrong about the Trump Russia collusion...now known as Obamagate.
So I honestly expected all these declassifications to be closer to Nov, but given it is happening now think there will be any perp walks before Nov? We know there have been criminal referrals already, but its anyone guess if the DOJ has acted on any of them yet. Thoughts?CID1990 wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 10:26 pmBoy Clapper must have a golden assSDHornet wrote:Sounds like Clapper might be feeling some heat:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/ ... -dni-james
Per John Solomon's website, you know the guy jelly claimed was wrong about the Trump Russia collusion...now known as Obamagate.
He’s lied to Congress continually...from NSA surveillance and now this
I’ll bet you that if it hasn’t already happened, he and Brennan are going to try to sign on to the Biden campaign for cover
Which would be deliciously ironic, that they would know how that keeps the DOJ at bay from Presidential campaigns when it isn’t co-opted by hostile bureaucrats
I want to hold off judgment until we hear from our resident expert on this matter, felchy.SDHornet wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 10:28 pmSo I honestly expected all these declassifications to be closer to Nov, but given it is happening now think there will be any perp walks before Nov? We know there have been criminal referrals already, but its anyone guess if the DOJ has acted on any of them yet. Thoughts?CID1990 wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 10:26 pm
Boy Clapper must have a golden ass
He’s lied to Congress continually...from NSA surveillance and now this
I’ll bet you that if it hasn’t already happened, he and Brennan are going to try to sign on to the Biden campaign for cover
Which would be deliciously ironic, that they would know how that keeps the DOJ at bay from Presidential campaigns when it isn’t co-opted by hostile bureaucrats
Er, no....it refers to what I saw on TV - Mueller was asked if Trump would be indicted if he weren't sitting in office and his answer was "yes". I believe they were talking about Obstruction of Justice.
Thanks!houndawg wrote:Er, no....it refers to what I saw on TV - Mueller was asked if Trump would be indicted if he weren't sitting in office and his answer was "yes". I believe they were talking about Obstruction of Justice.
You sure are turning into a pissy little bitch in your old age.
Mueller was lying and is a liar. Just like the rest of the Dems that pushed this.houndawg wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 8:03 amEr, no....it refers to what I saw on TV - Mueller was asked if Trump would be indicted if he weren't sitting in office and his answer was "yes". I believe they were talking about Obstruction of Justice.
You sure are turning into a pissy little bitch in your old age.
Fixed it.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 5:05 pmMueller was lying and is a liar. Just like the rest of the Deep Staters that pushed this.houndawg wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 8:03 am
Er, no....it refers to what I saw on TV - Mueller was asked if Trump would be indicted if he weren't sitting in office and his answer was "yes". I believe they were talking about Obstruction of Justice.
You sure are turning into a pissy little bitch in your old age.
This is the same judge who asked prosecutors why they weren’t charging Flynn with treason, right?Col Hogan wrote:To our esteemed legal team, are amicus briefs usually allowed in a criminal case???
Mueller is a Republican.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 5:05 pmMueller was lying and is a liar. Just like the rest of the Dems that pushed this.houndawg wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 8:03 am
Er, no....it refers to what I saw on TV - Mueller was asked if Trump would be indicted if he weren't sitting in office and his answer was "yes". I believe they were talking about Obstruction of Justice.
You sure are turning into a pissy little bitch in your old age.
