I didn't delete sh!t...Baldy wrote:Don't laugh at me. You're the one who claimed Washington State was so much more free than Texas and some other state you compared it with.Chizzang wrote:
That is what's laughable, but you obviously were smart enough to delete the post before it stuck.
and I'm done laughing at youI know you didn't, Chizz. I'm just teasing.Chizzang wrote:I didn't delete sh!t...Baldy wrote: Don't laugh at me. You're the one who claimed Washington State was so much more free than Texas and some other state you compared it with.
That is what's laughable, but you obviously were smart enough to delete the post before it stuck.
Baldy wrote:I know you didn't, Chizz. I'm just teasing.Chizzang wrote:
I didn't delete sh!t...
BUT...Washington State is in the bottom 25 states when it comes to freedom.
Grizalltheway wrote:Not that he wasn't already done, but this is the final nail in Kaisich's coffin.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-d ... -kitchens/
Microaggressions run amok.CAA Flagship wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:Not that he wasn't already done, but this is the final nail in Kaisich's coffin.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-d ... -kitchens/
But he was talking about the past.
These people are waaaaaaay over sensitive.
THis is representative of the incredibly unbelievable double standard that exists in our political world today:Grizalltheway wrote:Not that he wasn't already done, but this is the final nail in Kaisich's coffin.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-d ... -kitchens/
I can't stand Hillary but.....AZGrizFan wrote:THis is representative of the incredibly unbelievable double standard that exists in our political world today:Grizalltheway wrote:Not that he wasn't already done, but this is the final nail in Kaisich's coffin.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-d ... -kitchens/
Kasich (Republican) makes a comment about how he was elected THIRTY EIGHT FUCKING YEARS ago, and it's considered "the final nail" in his coffin.
Christie (Republican) is alleged to have been behind the CLOSURE OF A FUCKING BRIDGE LANE and he's deemed unelectable--and he's fat, which makes him doubly unelectable.
Bush (Republican) has the last name of Bush, which deems him unelectable.
Clinton (Democrat) has KNOWINGLY and PURPOSELY broken THE LAW with regards to exposing secret and top secret information through the use of an unsecured, illegal personal server--literally hundreds of classified emails made available to the most junior hackers--and yet she's the frontrunner and apparent nominee for the democratic party.
Honestly, I find the lack of concern on the part of democrats in general and the acceptance of this obvious double standard by democratic voters appalling. The level of partisan blindness and stupidity on display by democrats on a daily basis really gives me pause for the future of our country.
Another mature response from somebody who's going to push the Hildabeast button on Election Day.kalm wrote:I can't stand Hillary but.....AZGrizFan wrote:
THis is representative of the incredibly unbelievable double standard that exists in our political world today:
Kasich (Republican) makes a comment about how he was elected THIRTY EIGHT FUCKING YEARS ago, and it's considered "the final nail" in his coffin.
Christie (Republican) is alleged to have been behind the CLOSURE OF A FUCKING BRIDGE LANE and he's deemed unelectable--and he's fat, which makes him doubly unelectable.
Bush (Republican) has the last name of Bush, which deems him unelectable.
Clinton (Democrat) has KNOWINGLY and PURPOSELY broken THE LAW with regards to exposing secret and top secret information through the use of an unsecured, illegal personal server--literally hundreds of classified emails made available to the most junior hackers--and yet she's the frontrunner and apparent nominee for the democratic party.
Honestly, I find the lack of concern on the part of democrats in general and the acceptance of this obvious double standard by democratic voters appalling. The level of partisan blindness and stupidity on display by democrats on a daily basis really gives me pause for the future of our country.
Honestly this is the typical response from anyone on the left whenever you point out their own hypocrisy. Also you're called either a racist or an Uncle Tom (ironic).kalm wrote:I can't stand Hillary but.....AZGrizFan wrote:
THis is representative of the incredibly unbelievable double standard that exists in our political world today:
Kasich (Republican) makes a comment about how he was elected THIRTY EIGHT **** YEARS ago, and it's considered "the final nail" in his coffin.
Christie (Republican) is alleged to have been behind the CLOSURE OF A **** BRIDGE LANE and he's deemed unelectable--and he's fat, which makes him doubly unelectable.
Bush (Republican) has the last name of Bush, which deems him unelectable.
Clinton (Democrat) has KNOWINGLY and PURPOSELY broken THE LAW with regards to exposing secret and top secret information through the use of an unsecured, illegal personal server--literally hundreds of classified emails made available to the most junior hackers--and yet she's the frontrunner and apparent nominee for the democratic party.
Honestly, I find the lack of concern on the part of democrats in general and the acceptance of this obvious double standard by democratic voters appalling. The level of partisan blindness and stupidity on display by democrats on a daily basis really gives me pause for the future of our country.
As if Carson already wasn't going to win, this stupid comment sure isn't going to help.He's an 'African' American. He was, you know, raised white. Many of his formative years were spent in Indonesia. So, for him to, you know, claim that, you know, he identifies with the experience of black Americans, I think, is a bit of a stretch,"
What exactly am I being hypocritical about and why would I call you a racist or Uncle Tom? You're as butthurt as Z.DSUrocks07 wrote:Honestly this is the typical response from anyone on the left whenever you point out their own hypocrisy. Also you're called either a racist or an Uncle Tom (ironic).kalm wrote:
I can't stand Hillary but.....
I truly don't understand the left's refusal to recognize the importance of this debacle with the homegrown server. I'm not saying you don't care ( I don't know) but it's incredible that nobody cares.kalm wrote:What exactly am I being hypocritical about and why would I call you a racist or Uncle Tom? You're as butthurt as Z.DSUrocks07 wrote: Honestly this is the typical response from anyone on the left whenever you point out their own hypocrisy. Also you're called either a racist or an Uncle Tom (ironic).
That makes no sense. Yeah, it would've been easier to BUY a car, but it was more convenient if I just sourced all the parts and built it myself. 
I'm a pathetic contractor and I receive classified email on a daily basis. I can only imagine the types of communication's she received. Why is pointing out that incredible double standard considered being "butthurt"? That fact that you'd brush it away speaks volumes about your partisanship.kalm wrote:What exactly am I being hypocritical about and why would I call you a racist or Uncle Tom? You're as butthurt as Z.DSUrocks07 wrote: Honestly this is the typical response from anyone on the left whenever you point out their own hypocrisy. Also you're called either a racist or an Uncle Tom (ironic).
That's just it, Mark. I don't believe that the democrats have "bought it hook, line and sinker." I believe they truly DO NOT CARE. THAT is what is so frightening.Ibanez wrote:I truly don't understand the left's refusal to recognize the importance of this debacle with the homegrown server. I'm not saying you don't care ( I don't know) but it's incredible that nobody cares.kalm wrote:
What exactly am I being hypocritical about and why would I call you a racist or Uncle Tom? You're as butthurt as Z.
1) She says it was "out of convenience." Clinton found it more convenient to research servers and companies, have one installed and paid to maintain versus showing up at the State Department and using an email system already in place.
2) She's the top diplomat and we are supposed to believe that she never ONCE received a classified email?
She's full of shit and keeps giving out the lie and Democrats bought it hook, line and sinker.
This has more to do with her character, or lack of, than anything else.
If that really does hurt him, then our electorate genuinely is effed up beyond redemption and we need to require common sense tests for voting.Grizalltheway wrote:Not that he wasn't already done, but this is the final nail in Kaisich's coffin.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-d ... -kitchens/
If that is the case, then I'd say that's worst. If anyone else (especially a REPUBLICAN) had broken a security policy, people like Jon and Clinton would be calling for their head. And that's a fact. And what's worst is that they know it. They'll use the excuse, "Colin Powell used a personal email," without realizing that there are differences, namely Colin Powell and Condelezza Rice aren't candidates of President.AZGrizFan wrote:That's just it, Mark. I don't believe that the democrats have "bought it hook, line and sinker." I believe they truly DO NOT CARE. THAT is what is so frightening.Ibanez wrote: I truly don't understand the left's refusal to recognize the importance of this debacle with the homegrown server. I'm not saying you don't care ( I don't know) but it's incredible that nobody cares.
1) She says it was "out of convenience." Clinton found it more convenient to research servers and companies, have one installed and paid to maintain versus showing up at the State Department and using an email system already in place.
2) She's the top diplomat and we are supposed to believe that she never ONCE received a classified email?
She's full of shit and keeps giving out the lie and Democrats bought it hook, line and sinker.
This has more to do with her character, or lack of, than anything else.
So you should only be prosecuted for it if you're running for president?Ibanez wrote:If that is the case, then I'd say that's worst. If anyone else (especially a REPUBLICAN) had broken a security policy, people like Jon and Clinton would be calling for their head. And that's a fact. And what's worst is that they know it. They'll use the excuse, "Colin Powell used a personal email," without realizing that there are differences, namely Colin Powell and Condelezza Rice aren't candidates of President.AZGrizFan wrote: That's just it, Mark. I don't believe that the democrats have "bought it hook, line and sinker." I believe they truly DO NOT CARE. THAT is what is so frightening.
Nor did they have their own servers. Just a personal account (which is probably worst.)
The Left's apathy is disturbing.
No, but you certainly shouldn't be running for president if you're being prosecuted for it. See the difference?Grizalltheway wrote:So you should only be prosecuted for it if you're running for president?Ibanez wrote:
If that is the case, then I'd say that's worst. If anyone else (especially a REPUBLICAN) had broken a security policy, people like Jon and Clinton would be calling for their head. And that's a fact. And what's worst is that they know it. They'll use the excuse, "Colin Powell used a personal email," without realizing that there are differences, namely Colin Powell and Condelezza Rice aren't candidates of President.
Nor did they have their own servers. Just a personal account (which is probably worst.)
The Left's apathy is disturbing.
But why weren't conks up in arms about it when those two did it? Couldn't be hypocrisy, could it?AZGrizFan wrote:No, but you certainly shouldn't be running for president if you're being prosecuted for it. See the difference?Grizalltheway wrote:
So you should only be prosecuted for it if you're running for president?
Prosecute her, if she's found guilty, throw her ass in jail. There's a ton of hypocrisy from Democrats regarding support of Clinton. The fact she's running as a Democrat is deliciously hypocritical to begin with.AZGrizFan wrote:Why is pointing out that incredible double standard considered being "butthurt"? That fact that you'd brush it away speaks volumes about your partisanship.kalm wrote:
What exactly am I being hypocritical about and why would I call you a racist or Uncle Tom? You're as butthurt as Z.
No. If you do something wrong, pay the price. But there is a difference, especially when one of those people is running for President.Grizalltheway wrote:So you should only be prosecuted for it if you're running for president?Ibanez wrote:
If that is the case, then I'd say that's worst. If anyone else (especially a REPUBLICAN) had broken a security policy, people like Jon and Clinton would be calling for their head. And that's a fact. And what's worst is that they know it. They'll use the excuse, "Colin Powell used a personal email," without realizing that there are differences, namely Colin Powell and Condelezza Rice aren't candidates of President.
Nor did they have their own servers. Just a personal account (which is probably worst.)
The Left's apathy is disturbing.
People at the level of a presidential candidate, similar to Wall Street CEO are above the law.Ibanez wrote:No. If you do something wrong, pay the price. But there is a difference, especially when one of those people is running for President.Grizalltheway wrote:
So you should only be prosecuted for it if you're running for president?
I don't remember but was it uncovered after their service that they used these accounts? Or is it recent knowledge due to Clinton's use of a private server.Grizalltheway wrote:But why weren't conks up in arms about it when those two did it? Couldn't be hypocrisy, could it?AZGrizFan wrote:
No, but you certainly shouldn't be running for president if you're being prosecuted for it. See the difference?
kalm wrote:People at the level of a presidential candidate, similar to Wall Street CEO are above the law.Ibanez wrote:
No. If you do something wrong, pay the price. But there is a difference, especially when one of those people is running for President.
