Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

FCS Update wrote:http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... -for-1024/

Nice picks. Is there a way to change the format? It makes my eyes hurt...

Yeah the spacing if rough on the eyes

Just bolding the team names would probably work.

Good pics.


Think UNC will keep it close.

dbackjon wrote:Good pics.


Hope UNC will keep it close.

FIFY, Jonboy!

Are you ready for 14 November in Ogden?

The Big Sky portion of the Top 25 analysis is pretty weak.

Montana (3-0), Weber (4-1) and Northern Arizona (3-1) are currently 1-2-3 in Big Sky conference standing. Eastern Washington (3-2) is in FIFTH place due to its two conference losses and is currently competing with Montana State (3-1) for FOURTH place in the Big Sky.

EWU and MSU are NOT competing for 2nd place as claimed, at least not this week!

native wrote:The Big Sky portion of the Top 25 analysis is pretty weak.

Montana (3-0), Weber (4-1) and Northern Arizona (3-1) are currently 1-2-3 in Big Sky conference standing. Eastern Washington (3-2) is in FIFTH place due to its two conference losses and is currently competing with Montana State (3-1) for FOURTH place in the Big Sky.

EWU and MSU are NOT competing for 2nd place as claimed, at least not this week!

I said that the game was PART of the battle for 2nd place.

Montana is the obvious leader.

Then Weber/MSU/NAU. Weber already lost to MSU and still has Montana and NAU. So MSU gets the nod over them. NAU's only loss is to Montana in OT, so they're my favorite for 2nd place right now. EWU is a good team and a win drops Montana State. So I'd say they're part of the equation.

mcveyrl wrote:

FCS Update wrote:http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... -for-1024/

Nice picks. Is there a way to change the format? It makes my eyes hurt...

I hate the software. Still trying to toy with it.

I also just noticed that it took the extra spaces I put in the format out. WTF?

FCS Update wrote:http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... -for-1024/

Good stuff, Bobbert.

Should be better now. Let me know when you guys see issues. I appreciate the feedback.

Took out my extra lines again, but I added bold and italic.

FCS Update wrote:

native wrote:The Big Sky portion of the Top 25 analysis is pretty weak.

Montana (3-0), Weber (4-1) and Northern Arizona (3-1) are currently 1-2-3 in Big Sky conference standing. Eastern Washington (3-2) is in FIFTH place due to its two conference losses and is currently competing with Montana State (3-1) for FOURTH place in the Big Sky.

EWU and MSU are NOT competing for 2nd place as claimed, at least not this week!

I said that the game was PART of the battle for 2nd place.

Montana is the obvious leader.

Then Weber/MSU/NAU. Weber already lost to MSU and still has Montana and NAU. So MSU gets the nod over them. NAU's only loss is to Montana in OT, so they're my favorite for 2nd place right now. EWU is a good team and a win drops Montana State. So I'd say they're part of the equation.

Nice edit!

The most likely scenario is for UM/WSU/NAU to finish 1-2-3, in exactly the same position they are today.

Weber is the only team besides Montana that can possibly win the conference outright, regardless of whether or not another team falters, if they beat their 3 remaining conference foes.

NAU or MSU could possibly win a share of the title by winning out, but only if other teams falter.

Face it: THIS WEEK, Montana State is playing EWU in Cheney for FOURTH place in the Big Sky.

The best that MSU or EWU can do THIS WEEK is knock the other team out of contention for second place, not lock down second place.

native wrote:

FCS Update wrote:
I said that the game was PART of the battle for 2nd place.

Montana is the obvious leader.

Then Weber/MSU/NAU. Weber already lost to MSU and still has Montana and NAU. So MSU gets the nod over them. NAU's only loss is to Montana in OT, so they're my favorite for 2nd place right now. EWU is a good team and a win drops Montana State. So I'd say they're part of the equation.

Nice edit!

The most likely scenario is for UM/WSU/NAU to finish 1-2-3, in exactly the same position they are today.

Weber is the only team besides Montana that can possibly win the conference outright, regardless of whether or not another team falters, if they beat their 3 remaining conference foes.

NAU or MSU could possibly win a share of the title by winning out, but only if other teams falter.

Face it: THIS WEEK, Montana State is playing EWU in Cheney for FOURTH place in the Big Sky.

The best that MSU or EWU can do THIS WEEK is knock the other team out of contention for second place, not lock down second place.

That was not an edit. You can ask Chris or anyone else with access. You just have poor reading skills.

native wrote:
Face it: THIS WEEK, Montana State is playing EWU in Cheney for FOURTH place in the Big Sky.

The best that MSU or EWU can do THIS WEEK is knock the other team out of contention for second place, not lock down second place.

I'm not sure I have to "face" anything. These are my predictions, aka my opinion.

MSU beat WSU head to head and also is a one loss team. How do you count them out of the race for second place?

FCS Update wrote:...
That was not an edit. You can ask Chris or anyone else with access. You just have poor reading skills.

Probably so! In that case, my apologies for challenging your integrity.

But it sure was fun to use that little stick smilie!

I am not counting out Montana State. They have as much of a chance as Weber to knock off Montana and could end up winning the conference title.

Sorry, but the Big Sky portion of your top 25 analysis was weak, misleading and incomplete.

native wrote:

FCS Update wrote:...
That was not an edit. You can ask Chris or anyone else with access. You just have poor reading skills.

Probably so! In that case, my apologies for challenging your integrity.

But it sure was fun to use that little stick smilie!

I am not counting out Montana State. They have as much of a chance as Weber to knock off Montana and could end up winning the conference title.

Sorry, but the Big Sky portion of your top 25 analysis was weak, misleading and incomplete.

Honestly there just isn't much to say about the Big Sky this week. If you notice, I don't REALLY say much about any game. I've seen a lot of Big Sky games due to their free access, so it's not because I don't pay attention/care.

FCS Update wrote:

native wrote:
Probably so! In that case, my apologies for challenging your integrity.

But it sure was fun to use that little stick smilie!

I am not counting out Montana State. They have as much of a chance as Weber to knock off Montana and could end up winning the conference title.

Sorry, but the Big Sky portion of your top 25 analysis was weak, misleading and incomplete.

Honestly there just isn't much to say about the Big Sky this week. If you notice, I don't REALLY say much about any game. I've seen a lot of Big Sky games due to their free access, so it's not because I don't pay attention/care.

You did a good job by starting a couple of great threads.

In my view the MSU at EWU game is the biggest contest in the BSC this week because it is the most consequential. I honestly don't know who to pick.

It has been fun to be a rascal. Thanks for being a good sport.

FCS Update wrote:Took out my extra lines again, but I added bold and italic.

Much better. Thanks.

native wrote:

FCS Update wrote:
Honestly there just isn't much to say about the Big Sky this week. If you notice, I don't REALLY say much about any game. I've seen a lot of Big Sky games due to their free access, so it's not because I don't pay attention/care.

You did a good job by starting a couple of great threads.

In my view the MSU at EWU game is the biggest contest in the BSC this week because it is the most consequential. I honestly don't know who to pick.

It has been fun to be a rascal. Thanks for being a good sport.

I'll try not to stab you if we ever meet in person.