Cal Poly to the WAC?
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:10 am
Well so far this is hardly the year to be even thinking about this but I heard that Cal Poly may be joining the WAC in 2012-13? Can anybody confirm this?
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=9965
Yes, they need to average 15,000, but even that rule isn't really enforced. Its easy to get your official attendance numbers up from 11,000 to 15,000 without really increasing attendance. Take a look at the MAC attendance. Some of those guys have never really had the 15,000 limit handled well.CPAlum wrote:Hey thanks and thanks for the reply...they need to average 15k in per game right? They are expanding the stadium to 22k. That is supposed to be completed in 2010. Most of the games are at or near sell outs now and Spanos currently holds 11k. A friend told me about it and after I saw that the stadium was being expanded I started to believe it.
danefan wrote:Yes, they need to average 15,000, but even that rule isn't really enforced. Its easy to get your official attendance numbers up from 11,000 to 15,000 without really increasing attendance. Take a look at the MAC attendance. Some of those guys have never really had the 15,000 limit handled well.CPAlum wrote:Hey thanks and thanks for the reply...they need to average 15k in per game right? They are expanding the stadium to 22k. That is supposed to be completed in 2010. Most of the games are at or near sell outs now and Spanos currently holds 11k. A friend told me about it and after I saw that the stadium was being expanded I started to believe it.
The years you cite are interesting, because 2012 is the first year they will be allowed to move if they wanted. There is currently a moratorium on jumping moving up to FBS from FCS which is set to be lifted in 2012.
There is also some talk about adding a $1 million application fee to be allowed to jump to FBS football. The major conferences want all the money for themselves. They will try everything in their power to keep people out.
Don't worry about the attendance requirement, Idaho hasn't met it since they made the jump.CPAlum wrote:Hey thanks and thanks for the reply...they need to average 15k in per game right? They are expanding the stadium to 22k. That is supposed to be completed in 2010. Most of the games are at or near sell outs now and Spanos currently holds 11k. A friend told me about it and after I saw that the stadium was being expanded I started to believe it.
How stable do you think the BSC will be over the next 5 years? And why would they need SUU - just because SUU needs a home...TBirdz wrote:It seems that if this were to happen it would almost have to be a package deal with CP and UC-D both going to the WAC. Then maybe SUU could get an invite to the Big Sky and every school in the West would have a stable conference home.
CPAlum wrote:Hey thanks and thanks for the reply...they need to average 15k in per game right? They are expanding the stadium to 22k. That is supposed to be completed in 2010. Most of the games are at or near sell outs now and Spanos currently holds 11k. A friend told me about it and after I saw that the stadium was being expanded I started to believe it.
SDHornet wrote:CPAlum wrote:Hey thanks and thanks for the reply...they need to average 15k in per game right? They are expanding the stadium to 22k. That is supposed to be completed in 2010. Most of the games are at or near sell outs now and Spanos currently holds 11k. A friend told me about it and after I saw that the stadium was being expanded I started to believe it.
They’ll defiantly need that 22k seat stadium in order to provide enough seats for the whooping 6,900 people that show up to their playoff games.
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/b ... 0811290108
That is the explanation right there. EVERY team is low the first week of the playoffs around the country. You lose about 25% of the normal attendance so you guys are the same as everyone else. The Griz normally have less than 20K for the 1st round game so we lose a shitload as well.CPAlum wrote:SDHornet wrote:
They’ll defiantly need that 22k seat stadium in order to provide enough seats for the whooping 6,900 people that show up to their playoff games.
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/b ... 0811290108
I cant really explain that number? The games I have seen have been sold out or near sold out +/- 10k. Maybe because it was over Thanksgiving weekend and fewer student attended?
You have a good point there, maybe hes just saying that for justification. However, imo, Cal Poly would make a great Wac team. Location, school prestige, great stadium site, community support, good recruiting pipeline. Maybe 2012/2013 we might see this.Mike Johnson wrote: I think Pat Hill might have been justifying to his local media playing I-FCS teams.
Im not sure what you are talking about, Riverside is actually Ok... & Cal Poly's campus is TOP NOTCH. I dont think you know what you are talking about AT ALL. Sacramento State is a pretty bad looking campus in an even worse area. When we were in the hotel we couldnt sleep bc of idiots doing donuts in the parkinglot next door.SuperHornet wrote:I wish we could stop this cr@p right now. SUU will NEVER be in the Sky.
So Cow Poly's getting a 22K stadium. Big whoop. Liberty's getting a 30K stadium, they already have a big-time ski center, and major improvements to the rest of the athletic facilities are on the way. Cow Poly has always been a backwater in terms of CA athletics (not to the level of Northridge or Riverside, which are true ratholes), and probably always will be.
Then Montana would be in a conference by itself.BlackFalkin wrote:As far as SUU in the Sky... I really dont want to see another NCU type team in the Sky, heres a good rule of thumb... If you cant beat Montana at least half the time, an extra spot shouldnt be added for that team. (we have enough teams losing to them on an annual basis as it is. However, If SUU upgraded that horrible stadium, added field turf, & added a nice pressbox... then I wouldnt mind as much. Otherwise, whats the point?
AZGrizFan wrote:Then Montana would be in a conference by itself.BlackFalkin wrote:As far as SUU in the Sky... I really dont want to see another NCU type team in the Sky, heres a good rule of thumb... If you cant beat Montana at least half the time, an extra spot shouldnt be added for that team. (we have enough teams losing to them on an annual basis as it is. However, If SUU upgraded that horrible stadium, added field turf, & added a nice pressbox... then I wouldnt mind as much. Otherwise, whats the point?![]()
![]()
No, we are in a CLASS by ourselves.Cap'n Cat wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
Then Montana would be in a conference by itself.![]()
![]()
Um....it, like, already is.
AZGrizFan wrote:No, we are in a CLASS by ourselves.Cap'n Cat wrote:
Um....it, like, already is.
![]()
![]()
Wasn't saying anything about Sac's facilities, which really are cr@ap. Most Big West fans consider Riverside to be a dump, along with Northridge and Santa Barbara. The last time I was at Cow Poly, their field wasn't much better than Northridge's, which sucked even before they gave up the ghost. Not the worst in Cali, mind you, but not the best, either. My point was that 22K is nothing to celebrate when a school like Liberty is going to 30K.BlackFalkin wrote:Im not sure what you are talking about, Riverside is actually Ok... & Cal Poly's campus is TOP NOTCH. I dont think you know what you are talking about AT ALL. Sacramento State is a pretty bad looking campus in an even worse area. When we were in the hotel we couldnt sleep bc of idiots doing donuts in the parkinglot next door.SuperHornet wrote:I wish we could stop this cr@p right now. SUU will NEVER be in the Sky.
So Cow Poly's getting a 22K stadium. Big whoop. Liberty's getting a 30K stadium, they already have a big-time ski center, and major improvements to the rest of the athletic facilities are on the way. Cow Poly has always been a backwater in terms of CA athletics (not to the level of Northridge or Riverside, which are true ratholes), and probably always will be.
OK. We'll never bring it up again.SuperHornet wrote:I wish we could stop this cr@p right now. SUU will NEVER be in the Sky.