Page 1 of 1

10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:44 am
by FCS Update

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:49 am
by danefan
That actually looks pretty good. The AQ's could change (e.g. Colgate for HC, FAMU for SCSU, etc...) but the at-larges are pretty good.

Your brackets may be a little off though.

For example, SCSU would go to Richmond and Holy Cross would go to UNH instead (regionalization).

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:59 am
by guinzone
I made one as well:
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=9668

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:42 pm
by AZGrizFan
danefan wrote:That actually looks pretty good. The AQ's could change (e.g. Colgate for HC, FAMU for SCSU, etc...) but the at-larges are pretty good.

Your brackets may be a little off though.

For example, SCSU would go to Richmond and Holy Cross would go to UNH instead (regionalization).
I also don't know about SFA getting the autobid and then having to go on the road, while McNeese State stays home.

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:51 pm
by FCS Update
AZGrizFan wrote:
danefan wrote:That actually looks pretty good. The AQ's could change (e.g. Colgate for HC, FAMU for SCSU, etc...) but the at-larges are pretty good.

Your brackets may be a little off though.

For example, SCSU would go to Richmond and Holy Cross would go to UNH instead (regionalization).
I also don't know about SFA getting the autobid and then having to go on the road, while McNeese State stays home.
After seeding comes the bidding process. I would almost guarantee that McNeese would place a higher bid tham SFA. Autobids don't mean anything in the process. It just gets you in.

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:52 pm
by FCS Update
danefan wrote:That actually looks pretty good. The AQ's could change (e.g. Colgate for HC, FAMU for SCSU, etc...) but the at-larges are pretty good.

Your brackets may be a little off though.

For example, SCSU would go to Richmond and Holy Cross would go to UNH instead (regionalization).
Regionalization isn't always the rule. See 2007: UNH@UNI, Wofford @ Montana 2008: Maine @ UNI

Those are just the ones off of the top of my head.

I think sending SCSU to Richmond completely disrespects Richmond earning the #1 seed.

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:53 pm
by JayJ79
AZGrizFan wrote:
danefan wrote:That actually looks pretty good. The AQ's could change (e.g. Colgate for HC, FAMU for SCSU, etc...) but the at-larges are pretty good.

Your brackets may be a little off though.

For example, SCSU would go to Richmond and Holy Cross would go to UNH instead (regionalization).
I also don't know about SFA getting the autobid and then having to go on the road, while McNeese State stays home.
what do autobids have to do with home games?
Other than the 4 seeded teams, it is all about regionalization and who bids more money to get the home game (which revolves around season attendance, I think). McNeese is averaging 13000 in attendance and SFA is averaging 9900

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:56 pm
by JayJ79
FCS Update wrote:
danefan wrote:That actually looks pretty good. The AQ's could change (e.g. Colgate for HC, FAMU for SCSU, etc...) but the at-larges are pretty good.

Your brackets may be a little off though.

For example, SCSU would go to Richmond and Holy Cross would go to UNH instead (regionalization).
Regionalization isn't always the rule. See 2007: UNH@UNI, Wofford @ Montana 2008: Maine @ UNI

Those are just the ones off of the top of my head.

I think sending SCSU to Richmond completely disrespects Richmond earning the #1 seed.
regionalization only takes a high priority when it facilitates bus trips rather than plane trips (and I can't remember the number of miles between that the NCAA uses to determine which one they'll pay for).
I don't know the distances between the four schools in question, though.

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:57 pm
by danefan
JayJ79 wrote:
FCS Update wrote:
Regionalization isn't always the rule. See 2007: UNH@UNI, Wofford @ Montana 2008: Maine @ UNI

Those are just the ones off of the top of my head.

I think sending SCSU to Richmond completely disrespects Richmond earning the #1 seed.
regionalization only takes a high priority when it facilitates bus trips rather than plane trips (and I can't remember the number of miles between that the NCAA uses to determine which one they'll pay for).
I don't know the distances between the four schools in question, though.
That's right. If it requires a flight, then it doesn't matter how far that flight is. I believe the bus trip is 300 miles, but I may be wrong on that.

Its hard to imagine the PL AQ not going to a seeded team in the Northeast. That would be a bus trip for every single one.

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:06 pm
by AZGrizFan
JayJ79 wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
I also don't know about SFA getting the autobid and then having to go on the road, while McNeese State stays home.
what do autobids have to do with home games?
Other than the 4 seeded teams, it is all about regionalization and who bids more money to get the home game (which revolves around season attendance, I think). McNeese is averaging 13000 in attendance and SFA is averaging 9900
I realize that there's no definitive connection (as AQ Wofford was sent to AQ Montana a couple years ago), but more to do with what the school bids....

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:32 pm
by clenz
Would love to see NAU up in Iowa.



Jon, if you are reading this it would be a perfect time to come to Iowa with Alex...if you konw what I mean.

You would have a lot of guests

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:38 pm
by Cap'n Cat
I just want New Hampshire again for a warm up game.

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:42 pm
by UNHWildCats
Cap'n Cat wrote:I just want New Hampshire again for a warm up game.
they both keep playing like they are and the only time you may see New Hampshire is in Chattanooga.

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 3:06 pm
by AZGrizFan
UNHWildCats wrote:
Cap'n Cat wrote:I just want New Hampshire again for a warm up game.
they both keep playing like they are and the only time you may see New Hampshire is in Chattanooga.
That's fine. Montana will take them in Wa/Griz for a warm-up game. :nod:

Re: 10/12 Playoff Prognostication

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:12 pm
by dbackjon
clenz wrote:Would love to see NAU up in Iowa.



Jon, if you are reading this it would be a perfect time to come to Iowa with Alex...if you konw what I mean.

You would have a lot of guests
NAU hasn't fared well against UNI.

But, Iowa is a great destination. Plus, direct flights to Cedar Rapids