Page 1 of 2

QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 12:25 am
by Mvemjsunpx
Image

(8:00 PM MST)


Spread - Vandals by 4.5
Sagarin - Vandals by 8
Massey - Vandals by 7

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 6:41 am
by kalm
Mvemjsunpx wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 12:25 am Image

(8:00 PM MST)


Spread - Vandals by 4.5
Sagarin - Vandals by 8
Massey - Vandals by 7
Vandals need to create some offense. McCoy doesn’t look as effective.

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:10 am
by Mvemjsunpx
kalm wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 6:41 am
Mvemjsunpx wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 12:25 am Image

(8:00 PM MST)


Spread - Vandals by 4.5
Sagarin - Vandals by 8
Massey - Vandals by 7
Vandals need to create some offense. McCoy doesn’t look as effective.
Two comments…


1. Southern Illinois had arguably the best defense in FCS this season, so the fact the Vandal offense struggled against them wasn't shocking.

2. Idaho's biggest weakness all season has been pass protection. McCoy has had to be an improvisational wizard more often than his team would prefer, I'm sure. Albany is averaging 3.8 sacks per game, which leads the nation. :yikes:

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:25 am
by kalm
Mvemjsunpx wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:10 am
kalm wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 6:41 am

Vandals need to create some offense. McCoy doesn’t look as effective.
Two comments…


1. Southern Illinois had arguably the best defense in FCS this season, so the fact the Vandal offense struggled against them wasn't shocking.

2. Idaho's biggest weakness all season has been pass protection. McCoy has had to be an improvisational wizard more often than his team would prefer, I'm sure. Albany is averaging 3.8 sacks per game, which leads the nation. :yikes:
Agreed. And as Lance pointed out in the show, Idaho hasn’t scored in the 30’s since the first week of October. Albany’s offense is better than SIU’s.

Vandals need to get creative with pass protection and getting McCoy in space. Of course a run hand woukd also help in this regard but the Danes are giving up just 76 ypg.

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 1:46 am
by dal4018
kalm wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:25 am
Mvemjsunpx wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:10 am

Two comments…


1. Southern Illinois had arguably the best defense in FCS this season, so the fact the Vandal offense struggled against them wasn't shocking.

2. Idaho's biggest weakness all season has been pass protection. McCoy has had to be an improvisational wizard more often than his team would prefer, I'm sure. Albany is averaging 3.8 sacks per game, which leads the nation. :yikes:
Agreed. And as Lance pointed out in the show, Idaho hasn’t scored in the 30’s since the first week of October. Albany’s offense is better than SIU’s.

Vandals need to get creative with pass protection and getting McCoy in space. Of course a run hand woukd also help in this regard but the Danes are giving up just 76 ypg.
I picked Albany for the upset

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 7:32 pm
by kalm
Go Vandals.

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 8:24 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
7-7 in the middle of the first quarter after long TD passes for each team.

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 8:53 pm
by kalm
Mvemjsunpx wrote: Sat Dec 09, 2023 8:24 pm 7-7 in the middle of the first quarter after long TD passes for each team.
Idaho’s offense looks much better. Or Albany’s D isn’t as good as SIU’s.

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 9:05 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Woods scores on a direct snap. PAT blocked.

16-7 Vandals, mid-2Q

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 9:16 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Poffenbarger to Easton for 39 yards.

16-14 Idaho, mid-2Q

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 9:43 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Chavez misses a 52-yarder at the gun.

16-14 Vandals, halftime

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:12 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Chavez achieves the hat trick of missed field goals. :lol:

Still 16-14 Idaho, early-3Q

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:28 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Chavez makes one this time, a chip shot (his 5th. attempt already).

19-14 Vandals, late-3Q

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 11:06 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Albany hits a chip shot.

19-17 Idaho, early-4Q

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 11:22 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Poffenbarger connects with Easton in the endzone for the third time. A terrible 2-point try was no good.

23-19 Albany, 4:38 4Q

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 11:28 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Albany's pass rush finally gets home and causes a sack-fumble. Great Danes ball.

23-19 Albany, 2:46 4Q (Idaho has all 3 timeouts)

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 11:33 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Poffenbarger runs for the first on third & 5. Looking dire now for UI…

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 11:37 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Griffen Woodell runs it in from about 30 yards out.

30-19 Danes, :46 4Q

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 11:42 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Idaho elects to go for the quick field goal. Chavez hits it.

30-22 Albany, :25 4Q

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 11:43 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Danes recover the onside kick.

Albany beats Idaho 30-22

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 11:48 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Fun Fact!: Idaho hosts Albany in their home opener next season. :lol:

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2023 3:36 am
by dal4018
Mvemjsunpx wrote: Sat Dec 09, 2023 11:48 pm Fun Fact!: Idaho hosts Albany in their home opener next season. :lol:
The Big Payback

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2023 7:15 am
by Caribbean Hen
kalm wrote: Sat Dec 09, 2023 8:53 pm
Mvemjsunpx wrote: Sat Dec 09, 2023 8:24 pm 7-7 in the middle of the first quarter after long TD passes for each team.
Idaho’s offense looks much better. Or Albany’s D isn’t as good as SIU’s.
Wrong

Big Sky exposed as a fraud, propped up by the national voters and the polls didn’t have Albany ranks fairly until late in the year

This games should have been played in New York where Albany would’ve beaten by 28 points

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2023 8:51 am
by kalm
Caribbean Hen wrote: Sun Dec 10, 2023 7:15 am
kalm wrote: Sat Dec 09, 2023 8:53 pm

Idaho’s offense looks much better. Or Albany’s D isn’t as good as SIU’s.
Wrong

Big Sky exposed as a fraud, propped up by the national voters and the polls didn’t have Albany ranks fairly until late in the year

This games should have been played in New York where Albany would’ve beaten by 28 points
The Danes played well last night and playoff road wins are always hard to come by. Great WR play and the DL came through in the clutch.

I had them slowly moving up my poll after the UNH loss. Their best 2nd half of the season win came against an overrated W&M. They rose through attrition rather than quality wins but then proved it on the field last night upsetting Idaho.

Albany gave up 424 yards to a team that’s been struggling on offense so yes, SIU’s defense held Idaho more in check.

As for the Big Sky, it’s clearly the 2nd best conference by a significant amount. The computers, SoS, playoff results all suggest so.

That’s why the game was played in Moscow as it should have been.

Re: QF - #5 Albany @ #4 Idaho

Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2023 10:42 am
by dal4018
kalm wrote: Sun Dec 10, 2023 8:51 am
Caribbean Hen wrote: Sun Dec 10, 2023 7:15 am

Wrong

Big Sky exposed as a fraud, propped up by the national voters and the polls didn’t have Albany ranks fairly until late in the year

This games should have been played in New York where Albany would’ve beaten by 28 points
The Danes played well last night and playoff road wins are always hard to come by. Great WR play and the DL came through in the clutch.

I had them slowly moving up my poll after the UNH loss. Their best 2nd half of the season win came against an overrated W&M. They rose through attrition rather than quality wins but then proved it on the field last night upsetting Idaho.

Albany gave up 424 yards to a team that’s been struggling on offense so yes, SIU’s defense held Idaho more in check.

As for the Big Sky, it’s clearly the 2nd best conference by a significant amount. The computers, SoS, playoff results all suggest so.

That’s why the game was played in Moscow as it should have been.
Well my prediction came thru and that's all that matters.