Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 5:33 pm
UIW 16-0
Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=53318
Page 2 of 4
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 5:41 pm
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 5:43 pm
Mathis dropped a well thrown ball!!!!
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 5:48 pm
A series of errors by both sides leads to a Bison field goal.
16-3 UIW, 2:15 1Q
16-3 UIW, 2:15 1Q
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 5:56 pm
Bison lineman grabbed someoneMvemjsunpx wrote: ↑Fri Dec 16, 2022 5:48 pm A series of errors by both sides leads to a Bison field goal.
16-3 UIW, 2:15 1Q
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 5:56 pm
I'm not counting NDSU out yet. I've seen WAY too many FCS games look awful for teams, only for them to get their feet under them and come back and win it.
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 5:56 pm
1st qtr stats Word 197 yds offense, NDSU 10.
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 5:58 pm
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:02 pm
bizumb getting out-bizumbed by a more physical team.
The bizumb lynch mob must be going nuts over the way the UIW DBs are being so physical with the NDZU receivers.
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:04 pm
Holy Fuk 23-3…
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:06 pm
NDSU caught a break!!!!!!!
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:06 pm
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:08 pm
Not trying to be a jerk, but at this point, if it wasn't for UIW bad luck, NDSU wouldn't have any luck at all.
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:09 pm
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:21 pm
16-10 Bison
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:22 pm
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:39 pm
I know this is going to sound odd, but why do running backs get to lower their heads and drive into the defense and not get called for "targeting"?
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:39 pm
SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Dec 16, 2022 5:56 pm I'm not counting NDSU out yet. I've seen WAY too many FCS games look awful for teams, only for them to get their feet under them and come back and win it.
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:40 pm
UIW quit going for the hole in the defense.
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:41 pm
I have no idea how NDSU didn't get called for that Bayley-to-Belly suplex they put on the UIW quarterback....
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:44 pm
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:45 pm
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:46 pm
UIW with 3 turnovers in the half.
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:46 pm
I've asked the same question. If the defender is supposed to keep their head up when making a tackle why shouldn't the ball carrier be required to keep their head up when running?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:39 pm I know this is going to sound odd, but why do running backs get to lower their heads and drive into the defense and not get called for "targeting"?
I also wonder the same thing about hands to the face / facemask. Why should a ball carrier be able to grab a defender's facemask during a stiff arm?
Re: SF - (#7) UIW @ (#3) NoDak State
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:50 pm
I understand when someone has the offensive player in their grasp, but offensive players shouldn't be allowed to simply drop their helmet and drive into the pile. Gotta call it fair both ways.UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:46 pmI've asked the same question. If the defender is supposed to keep their head up when making a tackle why shouldn't the ball carrier be required to keep their head up when running?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:39 pm I know this is going to sound odd, but why do running backs get to lower their heads and drive into the defense and not get called for "targeting"?
I also wonder the same thing about hands to the face / facemask. Why should a ball carrier be able to grab a defender's facemask during a stiff arm?