Re: Teams That Run The Option
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2019 1:25 pm
I think Wofford is still running it maybe.
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=50403
Yep89Hen wrote:I think Wofford is still running it maybe.
Does anybody run the wishbone anymore?SuperHornet wrote:So, are we talking about the Wishbone, the Oregon Veer, the Delaware Wing T, or just running a lead option and/or speed option (with or without the pulling guard). I've known even West Coast teams run lead (or a G) option or a speed option as just a play within the regular offense. Does that count as "running the option," or does one have to have option as the basis of the offense?
I thought Air Force used a version of the flexbone too? Chip Kelly ran TO plays out of a 2 back set at Oregon. Not sure if it was before Sam Houston.Mvemjsunpx wrote:Does anybody run the wishbone anymore?SuperHornet wrote:So, are we talking about the Wishbone, the Oregon Veer, the Delaware Wing T, or just running a lead option and/or speed option (with or without the pulling guard). I've known even West Coast teams run lead (or a G) option or a speed option as just a play within the regular offense. Does that count as "running the option," or does one have to have option as the basis of the offense?![]()
Most triple-option teams run the flexbone. I think some teams may run it out of multi-back pistol sets (a trend started by Sam Houston in 2011). I believe Air Force used to run it out of more conventional formations (I-Form, etc.), but I'm not sure they still do.
SuperHornet wrote:So, are we talking about the Wishbone, the Oregon Veer, the Delaware Wing T, or just running a lead option and/or speed option (with or without the pulling guard). I've known even West Coast teams run lead (or a G) option or a speed option as just a play within the regular offense. Does that count as "running the option," or does one have to have option as the basis of the offense?
I think AFA does now, but I'm not sure they did when Fisher DeBerry was there (1984-06). This video (from 2009) shows them running a TO play out of a 2-WR Maryland-I of all things:UNI88 wrote:I thought Air Force used a version of the flexbone too? Chip Kelly ran TO plays out of a 2 back set at Oregon. Not sure if it was before Sam Houston.Mvemjsunpx wrote:
Does anybody run the wishbone anymore?![]()
Most triple-option teams run the flexbone. I think some teams may run it out of multi-back pistol sets (a trend started by Sam Houston in 2011). I believe Air Force used to run it out of more conventional formations (I-Form, etc.), but I'm not sure they still do.
93henfan wrote:SuperHornet wrote:So, are we talking about the Wishbone, the Oregon Veer, the Delaware Wing T, or just running a lead option and/or speed option (with or without the pulling guard). I've known even West Coast teams run lead (or a G) option or a speed option as just a play within the regular offense. Does that count as "running the option," or does one have to have option as the basis of the offense?
This must be sarcasmSACCAT wrote:Montana Sate runs the triple option the best of any school I have ever seen.
Anybody running the option right now runs it out of the flexbone as their base formationMvemjsunpx wrote:Does anybody run the wishbone anymore?SuperHornet wrote:So, are we talking about the Wishbone, the Oregon Veer, the Delaware Wing T, or just running a lead option and/or speed option (with or without the pulling guard). I've known even West Coast teams run lead (or a G) option or a speed option as just a play within the regular offense. Does that count as "running the option," or does one have to have option as the basis of the offense?![]()
Most triple-option teams run the flexbone. I think some teams may run it out of multi-back pistol sets (a trend started by Sam Houston in 2011). I believe Air Force used to run it out of more conventional formations (I-Form, etc.), but I'm not sure they still do.
We are the best at everything... But last year we did run the Wishbone/Flexbone ( did both at different times) quit a bit because our starting QB was suppose to be our starting LB... He ended up being All-Big SkyCID1990 wrote:This must be sarcasmSACCAT wrote:Montana Sate runs the triple option the best of any school I have ever seen.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah it made such an impact that nobody knewSACCAT wrote:We are the best at everything... But last year we did run the Wishbone/Flexbone ( did both at different times) quit a bit because our starting QB was suppose to be our starting LB... He ended up being All-Big SkyCID1990 wrote:
This must be sarcasm
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Everybody knew.... They just didnt want to remember.CID1990 wrote:Yeah it made such an impact that nobody knewSACCAT wrote:
We are the best at everything... But last year we did run the Wishbone/Flexbone ( did both at different times) quit a bit because our starting QB was suppose to be our starting LB... He ended up being All-Big Sky
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Flexbone... Broken Bone .... whatever the nameSuperHornet wrote:Just looked up the Flexbone. I hadn't seen it before. It's basically the old Double Wing Formation. So someone running the Flexbone is essentially using Wishbone principles instead of Single/Double Wing principles out of the same formation. Interesting....
Cats ran this play a lot throughout the season.... Sure not a true triple Option, more of a Zone readCID1990 wrote:Flexbone... Broken Bone .... whatever the nameSuperHornet wrote:Just looked up the Flexbone. I hadn't seen it before. It's basically the old Double Wing Formation. So someone running the Flexbone is essentially using Wishbone principles instead of Single/Double Wing principles out of the same formation. Interesting....
Yes, it is simply a Wishbone with the halfbacks split out inside the TEs. It give the strong side runners a head start on the corner of the formation and allows for less motion predictability.
But in simplest terms, it is still the wishbone and the QB still has 3 running/pitching options.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Looks quite similar to the offense my juco offensive coordinator (later my HS head coach; which is odd given that he played for our cross-town rivals and supposedly burned his HS letter jacket in front of the team to "prove" his loyalty to the program) invented, which pretty much guaranteed that the defense was wrong. He would shift between this and the traditional wishbone, usually running out of the 'Bone and passing out of this, with a "usual" quarterback assigned to each. But they couldn't exactly key on THAT, either, because both QBs ran plays out of both sets. We may have run some option out of this Double Wing set, but we usually passed out of it. We probably had some short passes out of the 'Bone, too.CID1990 wrote:Flexbone... Broken Bone .... whatever the nameSuperHornet wrote:Just looked up the Flexbone. I hadn't seen it before. It's basically the old Double Wing Formation. So someone running the Flexbone is essentially using Wishbone principles instead of Single/Double Wing principles out of the same formation. Interesting....
Yes, it is simply a Wishbone with the halfbacks split out inside the TEs. It give the strong side runners a head start on the corner of the formation and allows for less motion predictability.
But in simplest terms, it is still the wishbone and the QB still has 3 running/pitching options.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk