Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Dartmouth has hired Callie Brownson as offensive quality control coach, making Coach Brownson the first woman to be a full-time coach at the D-I level.

Congratulations, Coach Brownson!



https://www.wcax.com/content/news/First ... 32811.html

That's cool, be you!

Hope she does well. A women's perspective in play calling philosophy might be different.

Honest question - what exactly does an offensive quality control coach do?

Rob Iola wrote:Honest question - what exactly does an offensive quality control coach do?

I think it's a position for when you you're already at your assistant coaches limit but have someone who knows their shit, is willing to volunteer or earn camp money, and does not qualify as a grad assistant.

I noticed that there was a female ref at the VT @ ODU game.

I noticed her when she called a WR out of bounds and the call was overturned.

At least she had decent tits.

This woman played in a womens' football league but it calls to mind my belief that it should be possible to coach football effectively without ever having played football. Coaching is strictly an intellectual exercise. It should be possible for someone who never played football by virtue of not having the athletic ability to do so to nevertheless coach it by learning the principles of the game and effectively directing people who DO have the athletic ability.

I don't think it's any more necessary to have played football to be a football coach than it is to have been a chess piece in order to play chess.

93henfan wrote:I noticed that there was a female ref at the VT @ ODU game.

I noticed her when she called a WR out of bounds and the call was overturned.

At least she had decent tits.

Same thing for Ravens v. Broncos today - the stripes worked well in her ensemble...

kalm wrote:

Rob Iola wrote:Honest question - what exactly does an offensive quality control coach do?

I think it's a position for when you you're already at your assistant coaches limit but have someone who knows their shit, is willing to volunteer or earn camp money, and does not qualify as a grad assistant.

That's a fancy way of saying "mix Gatorade"...

Rob Iola wrote:

kalm wrote:
I think it's a position for when you you're already at your assistant coaches limit but have someone who knows their shit, is willing to volunteer or earn camp money, and does not qualify as a grad assistant.

That's a fancy way of saying "mix Gatorade"...

kalm wrote:That's cool, be you!

Hope she does well. A women's perspective in play calling philosophy might be different.

Seriously, no one is going to say it? Are you sure that is a woman?

JohnStOnge wrote:
I don't think it's any more necessary to have played football to be a football coach than it is to have been a chess piece in order to play chess.

That may be the stupidest analogy anyone on this board has ever used. I’m a lesser person for having read it. May God have mercy on your soul.

polsongrizz wrote:

kalm wrote:That's cool, be you!

Hope she does well. A women's perspective in play calling philosophy might be different.

Seriously, no one is going to say it? Are you sure that is a woman?

Dartmouth has always had the fugliest womyn in the Ivy League. Even back in my day.

Ivytalk wrote:

polsongrizz wrote:Seriously, no one is going to say it? Are you sure that is a woman?

Dartmouth has always had the fugliest womyn in the Ivy League. Even back in my day.

I’ll bet there were some school girl type foxes running around the hallowed halls back in the day, eh you sly dog!

kalm wrote:

Ivytalk wrote: Dartmouth has always had the fugliest womyn in the Ivy League. Even back in my day.

I’ll bet there were some school girl type foxes running around the hallowed halls back in the day, eh you sly dog!

Yup. Or so I’ve heard.

polsongrizz wrote:

kalm wrote:That's cool, be you!

Hope she does well. A women's perspective in play calling philosophy might be different.

Seriously, no one is going to say it? Are you sure that is a woman?

We are a kinder, gentler message board..

and frankly, I don't appreciate your insensitive gender normative misogynistic comment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

polsongrizz wrote:

kalm wrote:That's cool, be you!

Hope she does well. A women's perspective in play calling philosophy might be different.

Seriously, no one is going to say it? Are you sure that is a woman?

I agree .... tough call

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

JohnStOnge wrote:
I don't think it's any more necessary to have played football to be a football coach than it is to have been a chess piece in order to play chess.

This makes my head spin

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

CID1990 wrote:

polsongrizz wrote:Seriously, no one is going to say it? Are you sure that is a woman?

We are a kinder, gentler message board..

and frankly, I don't appreciate your insensitive gender normative misogynistic comment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah Pols! You insensitive pig!

kalm wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
We are a kinder, gentler message board..

and frankly, I don't appreciate your insensitive gender normative misogynistic comment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah Pols! You insensitive pig!

Thank you both for the kind words. I really appreciate it. Does it help that Pam thought she was a dude also?

Ivytalk wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:
I don't think it's any more necessary to have played football to be a football coach than it is to have been a chess piece in order to play chess.

That may be the stupidest analogy anyone on this board has ever used. I’m a lesser person for having read it. May God have mercy on your soul.

polsongrizz wrote:

kalm wrote:
Yeah Pols! You insensitive pig!

Thank you both for the kind words. I really appreciate it. Does it help that Pam thought she was a dude also?

Pam is obviously cowed by your toxic masculinity and, in light of her lack of empowerment (caused by your rape culture), is just going along with you


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CID is scissoring the clit off of this thread.

93henfan wrote:CID is scissoring the clit off of this thread.

That’s disgusting, 93!

Ivytalk wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:
I don't think it's any more necessary to have played football to be a football coach than it is to have been a chess piece in order to play chess.

That may be the stupidest analogy anyone on this board has ever used. I’m a lesser person for having read it. May God have mercy on your soul.

I don't think it's stupid at all. When someone plays chess they know the "capability" of each piece. You can take it from there. The point is that there is absolutely no reason to think someone has to have been a football player in order to understand the game then address tactics and strategy. They don't need to have been a player to assess players' capabilities either.

JohnStOnge wrote:

Ivytalk wrote:
That may be the stupidest analogy anyone on this board has ever used. I’m a lesser person for having read it. May God have mercy on your soul.

I don't think it's stupid at all. When someone plays chess they know the "capability" of each piece. You can take it from there. The point is that there is absolutely no reason to think someone has to have been a football player in order to understand the game then address tactics and strategy. They don't need to have been a player to assess players' capabilities either.

You’re comparing a piece of plastic to a human being, you dolt.

And you claim to be “pro-life.”