Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

EWU 49-24 Davis — The Eagles have several offensive threats, the Aggies have one

Sac State 41-37 Idaho St. — The Hornets seem to have a decent kicker for once

Weber 17-28 Suutah — Whoda thunk these two would both be winless right now? Oh wait…

Cal Poly 35-31 NAU — Tough to know how good CP is right now, but NAU's run D looks vulnerable

NoCo 10-38 Montana — The Bears are +6 in turnover margin & still look really bad

NoDak 10-37 Montana St. — UND is 2-2 despite averaging just 9.8 ppg and 206 ypg

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSPNQ82S ... r_embedded[/youtube]

EWU 49 UC-Davis 27
ISU 35 Sac St 31
SUU 27 Weber St 17
NAU 27 CP 24
Montana 35 UNC 10
MSU 35 UND 13

EWU
Sac
SUU
NAU
UM
MSU

I'm going to put the over under on Cal Poly rushing yards at 600...They had a huge game last week against PSU and NAU gave up a ton to South Dakota.

EWU 49 Davis 21 EWU has WAY to much fire power

Sac State 49 Idaho St. 42 Last team with the ball wins.

Weber 28 Suutah 17 Battle of the undefeated.....oh wait, nevermind

Cal Poly 21 NAU 35 NAU @ home at that altitude.

NoCo 3 Montana 42 Why do the Griz keep scheduling these cupcake D2's?

NoDak 7 Montana St. 49 This will be over by halftime..

EWU at cal davis - EWU wins big.

Sac State at ISU - Hornets win a close one.

WSU at SUU - Toss up, going with the home team.

CP at NAU - CP rolls with a huge road win.

UNC at UM - Griz in a landslide.

UND at MSU - Bobcats rebound with an easy win.

ajwildcat wrote:EWU 49 Davis 21 EWU has WAY to much fire power

Sac State 49 Idaho St. 42 Last team with the ball wins.

Weber 28 Suutah 17 Battle of the undefeated.....oh wait, nevermind

Cal Poly 21 NAU 35 NAU @ home at that altitude.

NoCo 3 Montana 42 Why do the Griz keep scheduling these cupcake D2's?

NoDak 7 Montana St. 49 This will be over by halftime..

Webs wasn't available.

EWU 42-3
Sac 55-10
Weber 21-6
CP 31-17
Montana 56-0
MSU 45-2

39-6 for the year. Perfection this week would be fine.

CP at NAU---Mustangs got their season going the right way last week against Portland State. Lumberjacks season took a slight turn at South Dakota...CP 31, NAU 21

EWU at UCD---The Eagles pull a Bobcat out of a hat last week at Montana State while the Aggies had an extra week to prepare for this game. A hard fought contest or a week off. As if it matters...EWU 45, UCD 28.

UND at MSU---North Dakota prepared for this game by getting by the CAA's Stony Brook team. The Bobcats let one get away last week against Eastern Washington. They better not let this slip...MSU 45, UND 10.

UNC at UM---In the battle of the Bears, the small Bears come in after falling at Northern Iowa. The big Grizzlies put up a fine struggle at North Dakota State. Should be no problem at home...UM 45, UNC 7.

SAC at ISU---The Bengals took an extra week to get ready for their home opener. The Hornets pretty much did the same, jumping on Menlo College for an easy win. Who's prepared more...SAC 38, ISU 35.

WSU at SUU---The Big Sky battle for Utah. The Wildcats fell to Stephen F Austin and the Thunderbirds fell to Fresno State. Come to think of it, neither team has won yet. Until now...SUU 35, WSU 21.

SuperHornet wrote:EWU 42-3
Sac 55-10
Weber 21-6
CP 31-17
Montana 56-0
MSU 45-2

SuperHornet wrote:EWU 42-3
Sac 55-10
Weber 21-6
CP 31-17
Montana 56-0
MSU 45-2

Our defense isn't holding anyone to 3 points, and Montana's O isn't scoring 45 points.

EWURanger wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:EWU 42-3
Sac 55-10
Weber 21-6
CP 31-17
Montana 56-0
MSU 45-2

Our defense isn't holding anyone to 3 points, and Montana's O isn't scoring 45 points.

You think Suc State is the 3rd best team in the conference, so forgive me if I take your opinion with a grain of salt.

Grizalltheway wrote:

EWURanger wrote:
Our defense isn't holding anyone to 3 points, and Montana's O isn't scoring 45 points.

You think Suc State is the 3rd best team in the conference, so forgive me if I take your opinion with a grain of salt.

I take my opinions with a grain Alcohol...thanks everyone...You've been great.

SACCAT wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
You think Suc State is the 3rd best team in the conference, so forgive me if I take your opinion with a grain of salt.

I take my opinions with a grain Alcohol...thanks everyone...You've been great.

Effin' A. It's offically Apple Pie season.

JALMOND wrote:39-6 for the year. Perfection this week would be fine.

CP at NAU---Mustangs got their season going the right way last week against Portland State. Lumberjacks season took a slight turn at South Dakota...CP 31, NAU 21

EWU at UCD---The Eagles pull a Bobcat out of a hat last week at Montana State while the Aggies had an extra week to prepare for this game. A hard fought contest or a week off. As if it matters...EWU 45, UCD 28.

UND at MSU---North Dakota prepared for this game by getting by the CAA's Stony Brook team. The Bobcats let one get away last week against Eastern Washington. They better not let this slip...MSU 45, UND 10.

UNC at UM---In the battle of the Bears, the small Bears come in after falling at Northern Iowa. The big Grizzlies put up a fine struggle at North Dakota State. Should be no problem at home...UM 45, UNC 7.

SAC at ISU---The Bengals took an extra week to get ready for their home opener. The Hornets pretty much did the same, jumping on Menlo College for an easy win. Who's prepared more...SAC 38, ISU 35.

WSU at SUU---The Big Sky battle for Utah. The Wildcats fell to Stephen F Austin and the Thunderbirds fell to Fresno State. Come to think of it, neither team has won yet. Until now...SUU 35, WSU 21.

4-2 this week, 43-8 overall.

Grizalltheway wrote:

EWURanger wrote:
Our defense isn't holding anyone to 3 points, and Montana's O isn't scoring 45 points.

You think Suc State is the 3rd best team in the conference, so forgive me if I take your opinion with a grain of salt.

Feel free to. It's early in the season. I was off on Sac State, although ISU does seem significantly improved over last season.

Montana could be #2 or 3 in the conference, but again, based on what I've seen so far this season they look vulnerable. Giving up 350+ yards of offense to a horrible UNC team being led by their third string QB isn't overly impressive, IMO. Offense is kinda boring and predictable.

EWURanger wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
You think Suc State is the 3rd best team in the conference, so forgive me if I take your opinion with a grain of salt.

Feel free to. It's early in the season. I was off on Sac State, although ISU does seem significantly improved over last season.

Montana could be #2 or 3 in the conference, but again, based on what I've seen so far this season they look vulnerable. Giving up 350+ yards of offense to a horrible UNC team being led by their third string QB isn't overly impressive, IMO. Offense is kinda boring and predictable.

80 or so came on a well-designed draw play with a QB who had some pretty good speed.

Also, you're starting to sound like robsnotes. I really don't care how many yards we give up if we only allow 16 or 17 ppg.

Grizalltheway wrote: 80 or so came on a well-designed draw play with a QB who had some pretty good speed.

Also, you're starting to sound like robsnotes. I really don't care how many yards we give up if we only allow 16 or 17 ppg.

I don't think that was a draw. Wasn't it just a dropback with a scramble? The Griz crashed on 3rd. & 1 & had no safeties deep to prevent the TD. I really doubt the Griz scouted Newsom since he was third-stringer in his first year with the team and they likely weren't aware he had that kind of speed.

Mvemjsunpx wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote: 80 or so came on a well-designed draw play with a QB who had some pretty good speed.

Also, you're starting to sound like robsnotes. I really don't care how many yards we give up if we only allow 16 or 17 ppg.

I don't think that was a draw. Wasn't it just a dropback with a scramble? The Griz crashed on 3rd. & 1 & had no safeties deep to prevent the TD. I really doubt the Griz scouted Newsom since he was third-stringer in his first year with the team and they likely weren't aware he had that kind of speed.

You're probably right. Either way, I find it funny that holding a team to 13 points isn't good enough in some people's minds. Especially fans of teams that can't even shut out Western.

EWURanger wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
You think Suc State is the 3rd best team in the conference, so forgive me if I take your opinion with a grain of salt.

Feel free to. It's early in the season. I was off on Sac State, although ISU does seem significantly improved over last season.

Montana could be #2 or 3 in the conference, but again, based on what I've seen so far this season they look vulnerable. Giving up 350+ yards of offense to a horrible UNC team being led by their third string QB isn't overly impressive, IMO. Offense is kinda boring and predictable.

You were way off. I knew our defense was pretty bad, but I didn't think they would be this bad. Stud LB Sankey was ejected early in the game, although he isn't the one covering WRs and giving up massive amounts of yards to opposing QBs.

Grizalltheway wrote:

Mvemjsunpx wrote:
I don't think that was a draw. Wasn't it just a dropback with a scramble? The Griz crashed on 3rd. & 1 & had no safeties deep to prevent the TD. I really doubt the Griz scouted Newsom since he was third-stringer in his first year with the team and they likely weren't aware he had that kind of speed.

You're probably right. Either way, I find it funny that holding a team to 13 points isn't good enough in some people's minds. Especially fans of teams that can't even shut out Western.

Unless you have NDSU's defense, your defense sucks.



…or something.

SDHornet wrote:

EWURanger wrote:
Feel free to. It's early in the season. I was off on Sac State, although ISU does seem significantly improved over last season.

Montana could be #2 or 3 in the conference, but again, based on what I've seen so far this season they look vulnerable. Giving up 350+ yards of offense to a horrible UNC team being led by their third string QB isn't overly impressive, IMO. Offense is kinda boring and predictable.

You were way off. I knew our defense was pretty bad, but I didn't think they would be this bad. Stud LB Sankey was ejected early in the game, although he isn't the one covering WRs and giving up massive amounts of yards to opposing QBs.

The Sears Effect.

Mvemjsunpx wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote: You're probably right. Either way, I find it funny that holding a team to 13 points isn't good enough in some people's minds. Especially fans of teams that can't even shut out Western.

Unless you have NDSU's defense, your defense sucks.



…or something.

That's the general consensus...