Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

4 teams in the playoffs. Kiss the ring.

"Here, King. Here, King. Roll-over. Play dead. Here's a treat. Good boy"

formerEag wrote:4 teams in the playoffs. Kiss the ring.

LOL what is the over under of how many playoff wins these 4 teams will get. 2?

Craig Haubert of ESPN has EWU playing (and losing to) NDSU in Frisco. Go Eags!!!!

The Kicker wrote:

formerEag wrote:4 teams in the playoffs. Kiss the ring.

LOL what is the over under of how many playoff wins these 4 teams will get. 2?

That was a good one. Hahahaha

I was surprised SUU got in, but I guess the win over MSU was what tipped the scales in their favor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ah but the Southland got a higher percentage! Three of eight (37.5%) vs. Four of 13 (30.7%).

I don't have a dog in this hunt, but how does Montana get a seed over NAU? Had to figure NAU (7-1 Big Sky) would be seeded over Montana (6-2 Big Sky), since NAU had the better conference record and handled Montana head to head 34-16.

EWURanger wrote:I was surprised SUU got in, but I guess the win over MSU was what tipped the scales in their favor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I was surprised myself after our loss to NAU yesterday... when I first saw the news... my wonderful and now not-as-innocent children heard their father yell out "HOLY SH*T WE'RE IN!"

BDKJMU wrote:I don't have a dog in this hunt, but how does Montana would get a seed over NAU? Had to figure NAU (7-1 Big Sky)> Montana (6-2 Big Sky), since NAU had the better conference record and handled Montana head to head 34-16.

It's a joke.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BDKJMU wrote:I don't have a dog in this hunt, but how does Montana would get a seed over NAU? Had to figure NAU (7-1 Big Sky)> Montana (6-2 Big Sky), since NAU had the better conference record and handled Montana head to head 34-16.

While they obviously didn't follow it entirely the NCAA SRS may have been a factor in that particular decision. Montana is at #8 in the NCAA SRS ratings and Northern Arizona is at #11.

Of course it's also got North Dakota State at #2 and the committee seeded the Bison #1. And it left Youngstown State out of the field even though the Penguins are #24 but put Samford in even though they're one spot lower at #25.

BDKJMU wrote:I don't have a dog in this hunt, but how does Montana get a seed over NAU? Had to figure NAU (7-1 Big Sky) would be seeded over Montana (6-2 Big Sky), since NAU had the better conference record and handled Montana head to head 34-16.

My thoughts exactly

Montana is an FCS darling. That's why.

93henfan wrote:Montana is an FCS darling. That's why.

And don't you forget it!

100%GRIZ wrote:

93henfan wrote:Montana is an FCS darling. That's why.

And don't you forget it!

Here's Kalm's left nut. Kiss it.

Stoked we got in! Beating Montana State, and FBS school and a tough game against NAU is probably what got us in. However we have a very tough task of taking on SHSU, going to have to ride our defense like we have all season.

Montana's SRS was higher than NAU.. seemed like that was a big part of the selection process.

SUUTbird wrote:Stoked we got in! Beating Montana State, and FBS school and a tough game against NAU is probably what got us in. However we have a very tough task of taking on SHSU, going to have to ride our defense like we have all season.

They've been free falling. Surprisingly they played their starting QB yesterday. I thought sure he was done for the year. But him running the option is a big part of their offense and I don't think he can take getting hit now. I'd heard he has a broken clavicle but surely not if they were playing him yesterday.

Also Flanders is hobbled. Not the same guy.

93henfan wrote:Montana is an FCS darling. That's why.

Feel free to bandwagon us since your Hens will be watching from home, again.

MrTitleist wrote:Montana's SRS was higher than NAU.. seemed like that was a big part of the selection process.

We're also a better team.

Grizalltheway wrote:

MrTitleist wrote:Montana's SRS was higher than NAU.. seemed like that was a big part of the selection process.

We're also a better team.

Grizalltheway wrote:

93henfan wrote:Montana is an FCS darling. That's why.

Feel free to bandwagon us since your Hens will be watching from home, again.

Maybe have some class for a change?

93henfan wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
Feel free to bandwagon us since your Hens will be watching from home, again.

Maybe have some class for a change?

You started it, bub. Montana earned their seed and will prove it on the field.

The SoCon went something like 2-7 head to head with the Big South this year. And CO-SoCon champ Furman, with a 7-5 record, went 1-2 head to head with the Big South- losing to 1st place Coastal, 4th place Garnder Webb, and needing a late 1 point win to beat 5th place Presbyterian.

7-5 Furman would've finished no better than 4th in the Big South, and yet, they get in over co-Big South Champ Liberty, who had an 8-4 record with losses to Kent State, Coastal and Richmond.

WHy? Furman and the SoCon are name brand. That's it.

bucs90 wrote:The SoCon went something like 2-7 head to head with the Big South this year. And CO-SoCon champ Furman, with a 7-5 record, went 1-2 head to head with the Big South- losing to 1st place Coastal, 4th place Garnder Webb, and needing a late 1 point win to beat 5th place Presbyterian.

7-5 Furman would've finished no better than 4th in the Big South, and yet, they get in over co-Big South Champ Liberty, who had an 8-4 record with losses to Kent State, Coastal and Richmond.

WHy? Furman and the SoCon are name brand. That's it.

I thought FU got the autobid.