Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

My latest blog is up. Sorry, SacSt, but you get flamed this week.
http://www.egriz.com/2013/09/big-sky-week-3-recap/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

MrTitleist wrote:My latest blog is up. Sorry, SacSt, but you get flamed this week.
http://www.egriz.com/2013/09/big-sky-week-3-recap/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Shit...Now McGhee has a bad ankle as well? God, that kid can't catch a break this year.

Err.. it should read separated shoulder. Got my injury confused.

MrTitleist wrote:Err.. it should read separated shoulder. Got my injury confused.

I know, I was just funin..

MrTitleist wrote:My latest blog is up. Sorry, SacSt, but you get flamed this week.
http://www.egriz.com/2013/09/big-sky-week-3-recap/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Fair enough, but we pulled out the win so it could have been worse.

SDHornet wrote:

MrTitleist wrote:My latest blog is up. Sorry, SacSt, but you get flamed this week.
http://www.egriz.com/2013/09/big-sky-week-3-recap/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Fair enough, but we pulled out the win so it could have been worse.

And FYI Mcghee was not wearing a sling today, just a protective sleeve looking thing (like what a basketball player wears.)

SACCAT wrote:And FYI Mcghee was not wearing a sling today, just a protective sleeve looking thing (like what a basketball player wears.)

That's good news. Hopefully he'll be back by NAU.

MrTitleist wrote:My latest blog is up. Sorry, SacSt, but you get flamed this week.
http://www.egriz.com/2013/09/big-sky-week-3-recap/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

SH loves the flames though.

uofmman1122 wrote:

SACCAT wrote:And FYI Mcghee was not wearing a sling today, just a protective sleeve looking thing (like what a basketball player wears.)

That's good news. Hopefully he'll be back by NAU.

Hey, nice sig!

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:

MrTitleist wrote:My latest blog is up. Sorry, SacSt, but you get flamed this week.
http://www.egriz.com/2013/09/big-sky-week-3-recap/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

SH loves the flames though.

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:

uofmman1122 wrote: That's good news. Hopefully he'll be back by NAU.

Hey, nice sig!

Eat a dick.

MrTitleist wrote:My latest blog is up. Sorry, SacSt, but you get flamed this week.
http://www.egriz.com/2013/09/big-sky-week-3-recap/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

While I might quibble with a couple of things here (to wit, the idea that Carroll can't beat a team that lost to a D-II that's not as good as Carroll is and Southern Oregon actually has dual membership in NAIA and NCAA D-II), you're actually being NICE here. NAIA OR NCAA D-II, we should have mopped the field with them. We're p!$$ed about it.

uofmman1122 wrote:

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
Hey, nice sig!

Eat a dick.

Spoiler: show

viewtopic.php?p=807980#p807980

SuperHornet wrote:

MrTitleist wrote:My latest blog is up. Sorry, SacSt, but you get flamed this week.
http://www.egriz.com/2013/09/big-sky-week-3-recap/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

While I might quibble with a couple of things here (to wit, the idea that Carroll can't beat a team that lost to a D-II that's not as good as Carroll is and Southern Oregon actually has dual membership in NAIA and NCAA D-II), you're actually being NICE here. NAIA OR NCAA D-II, we should have mopped the field with them. We're p!$$ed about it.

I watched the Southern Oregon/Rocky Mountain game a couple weeks ago and I came out thinking that neither of those teams could hold a Big Sky team under 40 points unless the Big Sky coach called off the dogs. I guess I was right about that, but I certainly didn't think either of them could hang 56 on a Big Sky school as well.