Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Week 2 | 9/09/2013 (Points)

1. North Dakota State Bison (349)
2. Eastern Washington Eagles (333)
3. Towson Tigers (301)
4. Sam Houston Bearkats (300)
5. Northern Iowa Panthers (277)
6. Montana State Bobcats (269)
7. South Dakota State Jackrabbits (231)
8. Montana Grizzlies (220)
9. Central Arkansas Bears (219)
10. McNeese Cowboys (213)
11. Eastern Illinois Panthers (195)
12. Richmond Spiders (161)
13. Stony-Brook Seawolves (160)
14. Cal Poly Mustangs (142)
15. New Hampshire Wildcats (126)
16. Georgia Southern Eagles (121)
17. Wofford Terriers (107)
18. Illinois State Redbirds (98)
19. James Madison Dukes (88)
20. Youngstown State Penguins (76)
21. Coastal Carolina Chanticleers (74)
22. Southern Utah Thunderbirds (63)
23. Lehigh Mountain Hawks (54)
24. Villanova Wildcats (49)
25(T). Delaware Fightin’ Blue Hens (46)
Maine Black Bears (46)

Others receiving votes:
Northern Arizona Lumberjacks 40, Fordham Rams 32, Eastern Kentucky Colonels 21, Bethune-Cookman Wildcats 20, Abilene Christian Wildcats 18, Samford Bulldogs 16, Northern Carolina A&T Aggies 14, Liberty Flames 13, William and Mary Tribe 12, Nicholls State Colonels 9, Western Illinois Leathernecks 8, Charleston Southern Buccaneers 8, Chattanooga Mocs 7, Jacksonville State Gamecocks 6, Portland State Vikings 4, Bryant Bulldogs 1.

I dunno about this.

OK. Nobody in the ORV deserves to get in...yet. (Though PSU DID make some noise this week.) The Keiblers are WAY too high. Other than that, the Top 6 are perfect. I'd push 19, 20, and 21 up a bit. The rest looks pretty good, though I'd drop SUU a bit. There's no way they're better than Lehigh, Villanova, or Delaware (ESPECIALLY Delaware)....

I love the luv for the Viks, but we still lost to Cal. We stayed relatively close but a loss is still a loss. Besides, Cal's QB threw for 480 yards. My opinion, we still have a long way to go before we are top 25, but thank you anyway.

That's true, JALMOND, but PSU should get credit for coming THIS CLOSE to beating a team that should have mopped the field with them. While PSU should not be ranked...for now...they're on the fast track to getting in IF this success translates into a decent early conference campaign and beyond. (That is, don't do what Sac State did after the OSU/Colorado wins the last couple of seasons....)

The only team I showed pity for who lost this week was SHSU.. because, Johnny Football.

0-2 Nova is considered better than a 2-0 Fordham. Fordham won the head-to-head game.

SuperHornet wrote:The Keiblers are WAY too high.

Didn't you also think Sac State had a chance to beat AzState?

SuperHornet wrote:I dunno about this.

OK. Nobody in the ORV deserves to get in...yet. (Though PSU DID make some noise this week.) The Keiblers are WAY too high. Other than that, the Top 6 are perfect. I'd push 19, 20, and 21 up a bit. The rest looks pretty good, though I'd drop SUU a bit. There's no way they're better than Lehigh, Villanova, or Delaware (ESPECIALLY Delaware)....

GODDAMNIT! FOR ONCE COULD YOU USE A FUCKING TEAM NAME!

Gil Dobie wrote:0-2 Nova is considered better than a 2-0 Fordham. Fordham won the head-to-head game.

Not in my poll.

I can't imagine why Villanova is ranked but overall, i'm not displeased.

Gil Dobie wrote:0-2 Nova is considered better than a 2-0 Fordham. Fordham won the head-to-head game.

Nova, 2 road losses including one to BCS Boston College.
Ford, 2 home wins including the head to head win.

I'd say they are fairly equal as of now. I usually give the home team 3-7 points, depending on who they are.

JALMOND wrote:

Gil Dobie wrote:0-2 Nova is considered better than a 2-0 Fordham. Fordham won the head-to-head game.

Nova, 2 road losses including one to BCS Boston College.
Ford, 2 home wins including the head to head win.

I'd say they are fairly equal as of now. I usually give the home team 3-7 points, depending on who they are.

If you look at the box score, Fordham win most of the statlines except penalties, over Nova. TOP 21:45 Nova, 38:15 Fordham

VILL FOR
1st Downs 16 25
Total Yards 332 363
Passing 164 190
Rushing 168 173
Penalties 1-10 5-28
3rd Down Conversions 3-9 12-19
4th Down Conversions 1-1 0-0
Turnovers 5 2
Possession 21:45 38:15

UNI ranked waaaay too high, men.

Ibanez wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:I dunno about this.

OK. Nobody in the ORV deserves to get in...yet. (Though PSU DID make some noise this week.) The Keiblers are WAY too high. Other than that, the Top 6 are perfect. I'd push 19, 20, and 21 up a bit. The rest looks pretty good, though I'd drop SUU a bit. There's no way they're better than Lehigh, Villanova, or Delaware (ESPECIALLY Delaware)....

GODDAMNIT! FOR ONCE COULD YOU USE A FUCKING TEAM NAME!

Yeah. Who the fuck are the Keiblers? Is there a team with Elves as a mascot?

93henfan wrote:

Ibanez wrote: GODDAMNIT! FOR ONCE COULD YOU USE A FUCKING TEAM NAME!

Yeah. Who the fuck are the Keiblers? Is there a team with Elves as a mascot?

The last time I checked, they are the Tigers not the Keiblers.

Georgia Southern #16?

Ibanez wrote:

93henfan wrote:
Yeah. Who the fuck are the Keiblers? Is there a team with Elves as a mascot?

The last time I checked, they are the Tigers not the Keiblers.

Now I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about either.

Ole Casey thinks the only good thing to come out of Towson is Stacey Keibler.

andy7171 wrote:Ole Casey thinks the only good thing to come out of Towson is Stacey Keibler.

It's Towson? WTF? That's disgusting!

Cap'n Cat wrote:UNI ranked waaaay too high, men.

Yep.

Why is Charlotte not on here? They're only going to lose one game . . . maybe

The Gadfly wrote:Why is Charlotte not on here? They're only going to lose one game . . . maybe

I responded to your post in the TSN Poll thread, but again, your two wins are Chowan and Campbell. Your chance to prove any first-year upstart validity is when you play JMU. If you play them tight through three quarters or somehow pull off a win, then you are worthy of being talked about.

Until then, good luck.

And scheduling D-III Wesley. Tisk, tisk.

What is a Chowan and a Campbell?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

EWURanger wrote:What is a Chowan and a Campbell?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A dog and a soup, I think.

93henfan wrote:

EWURanger wrote:What is a Chowan and a Campbell?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A dog and a soup, I think.

Or dog soup?


Sent from my iPhone