Page 1 of 1
FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:48 pm
by EPJr
The PFL would gain an automatic qualifier if the playoff field increases to 22 teams. Coaches across the FCS, though, generally support a 24-team field, which would add the PFL champ and three more at-large qualifiers.
At 24 teams, 16 could play in the first round, with eight earning byes. Such a bracket makes more sense than 20 or 22 teams.
"The playoffs are our subdivision's biggest asset," Viverito said. "Success in the playoffs is the primary goal of ours every season. Expansion to 20 teams was a very important step to giving more of our teams that opportunity. There's still more deserving teams that deserve that opportunity to play in the postseason. It's certainly our league goal to work for continuing bracket expansion."
"Playoffs are exciting, it just creates that atmosphere on campus that you want with your football program," Southern Illinois coach Dale Lennon said. "It's a fun thing to be a part of, so if you can make more opportunities, I think all the better."
The playoff system in NCAA Division II is 24 teams, while Division III invites 32 teams.
http://64.246.64.33/merge/tsnform.aspx? ... id=4425955" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 7:12 pm
by dal4018
EPJr wrote:
The PFL would gain an automatic qualifier if the playoff field increases to 22 teams. Coaches across the FCS, though, generally support a 24-team field, which would add the PFL champ and three more at-large qualifiers.
At 24 teams, 16 could play in the first round, with eight earning byes. Such a bracket makes more sense than 20 or 22 teams.
"The playoffs are our subdivision's biggest asset," Viverito said. "Success in the playoffs is the primary goal of ours every season. Expansion to 20 teams was a very important step to giving more of our teams that opportunity. There's still more deserving teams that deserve that opportunity to play in the postseason. It's certainly our league goal to work for continuing bracket expansion."
"Playoffs are exciting, it just creates that atmosphere on campus that you want with your football program," Southern Illinois coach Dale Lennon said. "It's a fun thing to be a part of, so if you can make more opportunities, I think all the better."
The playoff system in NCAA Division II is 24 teams, while Division III invites 32 teams.
http://64.246.64.33/merge/tsnform.aspx? ... id=4425955" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Love the idea creates more excitement.
Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 7:30 pm
by Brock Landers
Come on San Diego AQ!
Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 7:32 pm
by AZGrizFan
Every patsie we let into the playoffs makes the regular season that much less meaningful.
Auto bids to:
BSC champ
MVFC champ
CAA champ
Southern champ
and 4 at-large bids beyond that. Less is more.

Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:26 pm
by BDKJMU
EPJr wrote:
The PFL would gain an automatic qualifier if the playoff field increases to 22 teams. Coaches across the FCS, though, generally support a 24-team field, which would add the PFL champ and three more at-large qualifiers.
At 24 teams, 16 could play in the first round, with eight earning byes. Such a bracket makes more sense than 20 or 22 teams.
"The playoffs are our subdivision's biggest asset," Viverito said. "Success in the playoffs is the primary goal of ours every season. Expansion to 20 teams was a very important step to giving more of our teams that opportunity. There's still more deserving teams that deserve that opportunity to play in the postseason. It's certainly our league goal to work for continuing bracket expansion."
"Playoffs are exciting, it just creates that atmosphere on campus that you want with your football program," Southern Illinois coach Dale Lennon said. "It's a fun thing to be a part of, so if you can make more opportunities, I think all the better."
The playoff system in NCAA Division II is 24 teams, while Division III invites 32 teams.
http://64.246.64.33/merge/tsnform.aspx? ... id=4425955" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Did you hear the Cardinals won the world series?
Did you hear NDSU won the NC?
I heard the Giants won the Super Bowl..
Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:28 pm
by BDKJMU
EPJr wrote:
The PFL would gain an automatic qualifier if the playoff field increases to 22 teams. Coaches across the FCS, though, generally support a 24-team field, which would add the PFL champ and three more at-large qualifiers.
At 24 teams, 16 could play in the first round, with eight earning byes. Such a bracket makes more sense than 20 or 22 teams.
"The playoffs are our subdivision's biggest asset," Viverito said. "Success in the playoffs is the primary goal of ours every season. Expansion to 20 teams was a very important step to giving more of our teams that opportunity. There's still more deserving teams that deserve that opportunity to play in the postseason. It's certainly our league goal to work for continuing bracket expansion."
"Playoffs are exciting, it just creates that atmosphere on campus that you want with your football program," Southern Illinois coach Dale Lennon said. "It's a fun thing to be a part of, so if you can make more opportunities, I think all the better."
The playoff system in NCAA Division II is 24 teams, while Division III invites 32 teams.
http://64.246.64.33/merge/tsnform.aspx? ... id=4425955" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
You post an article from last Aug like its breaking news.

Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:45 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
AZGrizFan wrote:Every patsie we let into the playoffs makes the regular season that much less meaningful.
Auto bids to:
BSC champ
MVFC champ
CAA champ
Southern champ
and 4 at-large bids beyond that. Less is more.

I personally think 2 teams are enough. If you can't be the very best team in the regular season, why should you have a shot at a championship? You just don't deserve it. Even better, the NCAA can take the corrupt committee out of the process & have the 2 championship teams decided by some sort of amalgam combining the top-25 polls & computer rankings; a nice combination of subjectivity & objectivity. I know what I'm describing is a bit radical & out there, but it's difficult to envision a fairer system than that.
Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 10:44 pm
by SuperHornet
I hope you just forgot to hit the sarcasm button, Venus. Otherwise, that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Who decides just who those teams are? Computers are notoriously inaccurate, particularly since they depend on fallible humans for programming. You're essentially parroting the B(C)$ company line. Such a dumb thing eliminates the excitement of an upset. That's one of the things that makes a playoff so fun.

Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 10:47 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
SuperHornet wrote:I hope you just forgot to hit the sarcasm button, Venus. Otherwise, that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Who decides just who those teams are? Computers are notoriously inaccurate, particularly since they depend on fallible humans for programming. You're essentially parroting the B(C)$ company line. Such a dumb thing eliminates the excitement of an upset. That's one of the things that makes a playoff so fun.

No, I
actually just came up with the BCS system on my own 14 years
after college football started using it. I've been frozen inside a glacier since high school.

- Is that better.

Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 11:00 pm
by CatBlitz22
BOO! HISS!
Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 11:12 pm
by AZGrizFan
Mvemjsunpx wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:Every patsie we let into the playoffs makes the regular season that much less meaningful.
Auto bids to:
BSC champ
MVFC champ
CAA champ
Southern champ
and 4 at-large bids beyond that. Less is more.

I personally think 2 teams are enough. If you can't be the very best team in the regular season, why should you have a shot at a championship? You just don't deserve it. Even better, the NCAA can take the corrupt committee out of the process & have the 2 championship teams decided by some sort of amalgam combining the top-25 polls & computer rankings; a nice combination of subjectivity & objectivity. I know what I'm describing is a bit radical & out there, but it's difficult to envision a fairer system than that.
I couldn't agree more, as long as one of those two teams is always named Montana.

Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:37 am
by SuperHornet
Mvemjsunpx wrote:SuperHornet wrote:I hope you just forgot to hit the sarcasm button, Venus. Otherwise, that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Who decides just who those teams are? Computers are notoriously inaccurate, particularly since they depend on fallible humans for programming. You're essentially parroting the B(C)$ company line. Such a dumb thing eliminates the excitement of an upset. That's one of the things that makes a playoff so fun.

No, I
actually just came up with the BCS system on my own 14 years
after college football started using it. I've been frozen inside a glacier since high school.

- Is that better.


Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:36 am
by Cap'n Cat
The more, the merrier.
Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:05 am
by Screamin_Eagle174
Cap'n Cat wrote:The more, the merrier.

Re: FCS playoff expansion distinct possibility
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:56 am
by CAA Flagship
Mvemjsunpx wrote:
I personally think 2 teams are enough. If you can't be the very best team in the regular season, why should you have a shot at a championship? You just don't deserve it.
Nope. Nothing fair about that.