Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

LLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO

you should add a poll so we can vote for who wins. or is it just me that loves the polls. and dont any one talk sh** i didnt say pole!

Sac by 13. 30-17.

MSU by 21

AZGrizFan wrote:Sac by 13. 30-17.

Seriously? Sac is a good team and I could see you picking them to win, but to think the MSU will only score 17 points at home, when um's dysfunctional offense scored 28 on the road and that includes 3 int's by um. AZ you need to at least throw a little logic into your posts once in awhile.

Cats win in OT 41-38.. Cats kick 55 yard field goal to win game!

This game will be available on Comcast SportsNet CA, (Dish Network 409 & Direct TV 698)they will be picking up the Max media feed. I just dont know yet if Comcast will put it out in HD or not, the Max Medial Production will be in HD though across Montana.

Also available on Big Sky TV

game Day info here includint both sets of game notes
http://www.msubobcats.com/news/2011/9/2 ... 15714.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

cats2506 wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:Sac by 13. 30-17.

Seriously? Sac is a good team and I could see you picking them to win, but to think the MSU will only score 17 points at home, when um's dysfunctional offense scored 28 on the road and that includes 3 int's by um. AZ you need to at least throw a little logic into your posts once in awhile.

26000 posts and NOW you want me to start using logic?


Fine. 47-30. Better?

AZGrizFan wrote:

cats2506 wrote:
Seriously? Sac is a good team and I could see you picking them to win, but to think the MSU will only score 17 points at home, when um's dysfunctional offense scored 28 on the road and that includes 3 int's by um. AZ you need to at least throw a little logic into your posts once in awhile.

26000 posts and NOW you want me to start using logic?


Fine. 47-30. Better?

Better

AZGrizFan wrote: 26000 posts and NOW you want me to start using logic?

How is 26000 post even possible from the time you created your account?

Unless MSU scores only TDs to run away with the game, Cunningham alone will score at least 15 points, especially in a close game.

grizcountry420 wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote: 26000 posts and NOW you want me to start using logic?

How is 26000 post even possible from the time you created your account?

Four years and 3 months = 1550 days. 25600/1550 = 16 posts a day. Most posts take about 15 seconds. It's really not that difficult.

AZGrizFan wrote:

grizcountry420 wrote:
How is 26000 post even possible from the time you created your account?

Four years and 3 months = 1550 days. 25600/1550 = 16 posts a day. Most posts take about 15 seconds. It's really not that difficult.

20,000 have been duking it out with JBB and Lakes

48-33 Bobcats. Starts off close then gets out of control in the and half.

MSU 28
Sac State 24.

Sac State is definitely capable of beating the Cats and if McGhee and the Bobcats can't get their passing attack unleashed then they could be in trouble. It is going to be a great game. Both teams are very similar in what they want to do. At least the Bobcats won't be going from snow to 100 degree heat this year.

Gil Dobie wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Four years and 3 months = 1550 days. 25600/1550 = 16 posts a day. Most posts take about 15 seconds. It's really not that difficult.

20,000 have been duking it out with JBB and Lakes

Now, come on. They've really only put their stupidity on display the last 6-8 months or so.

AZGrizFan wrote:

Gil Dobie wrote:
20,000 have been duking it out with JBB and Lakes

Now, come on. They've really only put their stupidity on display the last 6-8 months or so.

unlike you huh?

I'd put my money on the cats at home, but I'm pulling for Sac for conference standing purposes.

While I understand the likelihood of a Kitty win, what I REALLY don't get are Weber fans pulling for MSU in this one. Is it just me, or does a Sac win not make Weber's win over Sac look better?

SuperHornet wrote:While I understand the likelihood of a Kitty win, what I REALLY don't get are Weber fans pulling for MSU in this one. Is it just me, or does a Sac win not make Weber's win over Sac look better?

Well most people when they make predictions go with what they think will happen, not what they want to happen...

Silenoz wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:While I understand the likelihood of a Kitty win, what I REALLY don't get are Weber fans pulling for MSU in this one. Is it just me, or does a Sac win not make Weber's win over Sac look better?

Well most people when they make predictions go with what they think will happen, not what they want to happen...

I saw one Wildcat fan say that he "[s]ure hope[s] the cats can beat sac state..." You're correct, Sil, which makes me wonder about THIS one. Most Weber fans that I see at least give Sac the benefit of the doubt during non-Weber weeks, if not outright pulling for us. Hence my confusion.

Simple, people dont like hornets,

cats2506 wrote:Simple, people dont like hornets,

Specifically Grizzlies and Beavers.

SDHornet wrote:

cats2506 wrote:Simple, people dont like hornets,

Specifically Grizzlies and Beavers.

Yeah, that 16-1 head-to-head really eats me up inside.

Grizalltheway wrote:

SDHornet wrote: Specifically Grizzlies and Beavers.

Yeah, that 16-1 head-to-head really eats me up inside.

Means nothing this year.

Oh and