Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Hope Eagles fans are ready for they're beating next Sunday.

This is not only era elitism, it is also misleading.

The Iggles have THREE NFL Championships.

Of course, by that standard, the Giants have SEVEN. But PLEASE be accurate....

SuperHornet wrote:This is not only era elitism, it is also misleading.

The Iggles have THREE NFL Championships.

Of course, by that standard, the Giants have SEVEN. But PLEASE be accurate....

Let him go. What good is living in the past if you can't also rewrite it.

The Iggles' last title was led by two of the toughest guys in NFL history: QB Norm Van Brocklin (a rare guy who won titles with two different teams) and C-LB Chuck Bednarik, the last of the two-way stars.

SuperHornet wrote:This is not only era elitism, it is also misleading.

The Iggles have THREE NFL Championships.

Of course, by that standard, the Giants have SEVEN. But PLEASE be accurate....

Please notice I said "Super Bowl Championships" not "NFL Championships" and how is it living in the past when its current day fact?

ODUalum11 wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:This is not only era elitism, it is also misleading.

The Iggles have THREE NFL Championships.

Of course, by that standard, the Giants have SEVEN. But PLEASE be accurate....

Please notice I said "Super Bowl Championships" not "NFL Championships" and how is it living in the past when its current day fact?

What you're doing is saying that the Super Bowl era is better than the previous era by definition. I'm asserting that that is not true.

ODUalum11 wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:This is not only era elitism, it is also misleading.

The Iggles have THREE NFL Championships.

Of course, by that standard, the Giants have SEVEN. But PLEASE be accurate....

Please notice I said "Super Bowl Championships" not "NFL Championships" and how is it living in the past when its current day fact?

Everything that happened in the past is current day fact. Otherwise it didn't happen.

What does the first three Giant SB wins have to do with next weekends game? Is Lawrence Taylor playing this weekend? Phil Simms?

They might be better off with Simms at QB (though both teams are DEFINITELY better off with who they currently have than Joe Pisarcik).

But note that all MY argument shows is that the Giants STILL have a better resume than the Iggles. (In fact, the disparity is worse.) I'm just saying that they should ALL be included.

SuperHornet wrote:They might be better off with Simms at QB (though both teams are DEFINITELY better off with who they currently have than Joe Pisarcik).

But note that all MY argument shows is that the Giants STILL have a better resume than the Iggles. (In fact, the disparity is worse.) I'm just saying that they should ALL be included.

True. But they don't play the game with resumes.

SuperHornet wrote: But note that all MY argument shows is that the Giants STILL have a better resume than the Iggles. (In fact, the disparity is worse.) I'm just saying that they should ALL be included.

7/3 = 6.93

3/0 = impossible


I think 6.93 is better than the alternative.

Wouldn't 6-0 be a better gauge? As in the Eagles have beaten the Gints 6 straight times.

[youtube][/youtube]

You would think with all the Giant fuck ups to the Eagles their fans would just stop the pain.

[youtube][/youtube]

so every team has a streak against another team, so what? it can't continue forever.

I almost feel bad for Gints fans to have to relive this.

[youtube][/youtube]

89Hen wrote:I almost feel bad for Gints fans to have to relive this.

[youtube][/youtube]

you really want to play this game?

ODUalum11 wrote:so every team has a streak against another team, so what? it can't continue forever.

When it comes to Eagles - Gints, it sure can.

[youtube][/youtube]

ODUalum11 wrote:you really want to play this game?

Either you're too young or stoopid to know you have no chance of winning this battle. I hope it's age.

I'll just point out that the giants own the all-time series vs. the Eagles.

ODUalum11 wrote:I'll just point out that the giants own the all-time series vs. the Eagles.

Probably not in your lifetime. The last ten years has been 15-7 in favor of the Birds. Who cares who won in 1948?

89Hen wrote:

ODUalum11 wrote:I'll just point out that the giants own the all-time series vs. the Eagles.

Probably not in your lifetime. The last ten years has been 15-7 in favor of the Birds. Who cares who won in 1948?

You're really gonna come on here show highlights from games from previous years and ask the question of who cares who won in a certain year?

ODUalum11 wrote:

89Hen wrote: Probably not in your lifetime. The last ten years has been 15-7 in favor of the Birds. Who cares who won in 1948?

You're really gonna come on here show highlights from games from previous years and ask the question of who cares who won in a certain year?

Two of the four were recent and they are all timeless.

89Hen wrote:

ODUalum11 wrote:
You're really gonna come on here show highlights from games from previous years and ask the question of who cares who won in a certain year?

Two of the four were recent and they are all timeless.

Just like the Giants Super Bowl Championships. I wish you could have the same satisfaction of seeing the Eagles win the Super Bowl but unfortunately I don't think that will happen anytime soon.

ODUalum11 wrote:

89Hen wrote: Two of the four were recent and they are all timeless.

Just like the Giants Super Bowl Championships. I wish you could have the same satisfaction of seeing the Eagles win the Super Bowl but unfortunately I don't think that will happen anytime soon.

You weren't even alive for two of the three. You sure you're not a Redskins fan?

89Hen wrote:

ODUalum11 wrote:
Just like the Giants Super Bowl Championships. I wish you could have the same satisfaction of seeing the Eagles win the Super Bowl but unfortunately I don't think that will happen anytime soon.

You weren't even alive for two of the three. You sure you're not a Redskins fan?

Actually I was alive for 2 of the 3. I think if you look at my username you can figure out when i was born.

Also, I will not tolerate such a slap in the face that is the question if I'm sure I'm not a Redskins fan.

ODUalum11 wrote:

89Hen wrote: You weren't even alive for two of the three. You sure you're not a Redskins fan?

Actually I was alive for 2 of the 3. I think if you look at my username you can figure out when i was born.

Also, I will not tolerate such a slap in the face that is the question if I'm sure I'm not a Redskins fan.

Haha...Closet Redskins fan. All of the pain will go away if you just come out and admit it.