Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Delaware sucks

BeauFoster wrote:Delaware sucks

Delaware blows.

89Hen wrote:

Lobbin' grenades again, Hen?

89Hen wrote:

Congrats on hitting double digit posts...




Hens lay eggs.

I'm a Blue Hen fan so I can't pick on the team or program but I can take a shot at 89.

Does anyone else find it interesting that he is a great poster on AGS but over here he is nothing more than a poor man's alexale23?

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:I'm a Blue Hen fan so I can't pick on the team or program but I can take a shot at 89.

Does anyone else find it interesting that he is a great poster on AGS but over here he is nothing more than a poor man's alexale23?

alexale89?



Works for me.

Make sure you vote for 89Hen in the CS.com P.O.Y. category: Soonest To Die In A Car Crash With His Family.

This post can be filed under the heading of....DUH!

Tell that to the PCC, dude. They've been skating by on just Gonzaga for years.

SuperHornet wrote:Tell that to the PCC, dude. They've been skating by on just Gonzaga for years.

And Socon is hanging on ASU for 4 years, MVC has UNI, Big Sky has Montana, GWFC has Cal Poly, NEC has Albany, etc., etc., etc. I have YET to figure out how having some team come out of nowhere every year somehow makes a conference "better".

AZGrizFan wrote:I have YET to figure out how having some team come out of nowhere every year somehow makes a conference "better".

That's only because you haven't had a team not named Montana "come out of nowhere" (or somewhere for that matter) from the BSC since 1984.

Nevada 1990
Boise 1994

...oh, yeah.

89Hen wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:I have YET to figure out how having some team come out of nowhere every year somehow makes a conference "better".

That's only because you haven't had a team not named Montana "come out of nowhere" (or somewhere for that matter) from the BSC since 1984.

That's a circular argument at best, Hen. That STILL doesn't explain why the Russian Roulette you guys play every year in the CAA somehow makes YOU a better conference....

The fact that a team can go from the NC game to 3-8 in ONE year speaks VOLUMES about the coach's ability to reload and recruit, not about the relative strength of the conference. IMHO.

Heck, the CAA isn't really even a conference. More of a scheduling association.

How can you have a conference if you only play 3/4 of the teams?

travelinman67 wrote:Nevada 1990
Boise 1994

...oh, yeah.

How did they finish in the BSC this year?

AZGrizFan wrote:That STILL doesn't explain why the Russian Roulette you guys play every year in the CAA somehow makes YOU a better conference....

If it were just different teams winning the CONFERENCE and then failing in post-season against the other confernces you'd have a point. However it's different teams going to, and winning the NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP and beating a bunch of other conference champs on the way. Only four teams have won the NC in the last six years. Three are from the CAA... all different teams. Sorry bud.

You know, if Ralph was here, he'd have TheHen banned.

Cap'n Cat wrote:You know, if Ralph was here, he'd have TheHen banned.

good thing we don't roll that way here...

You know, I used to get after Montana for being in a one-team conference, but began to think that, hey, how can their success somehow be a failure of theirs?

89Hen wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:That STILL doesn't explain why the Russian Roulette you guys play every year in the CAA somehow makes YOU a better conference....

If it were just different teams winning the CONFERENCE and then failing in post-season against the other confernces you'd have a point. However it's different teams going to, and winning the NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP and beating a bunch of other conference champs on the way. Only four teams have won the NC in the last six years. Three are from the CAA... all different teams. Sorry bud.

I can see how being good and then falling off the map would need some justification as to why the mediocrity occurs. I understand now.

AZGrizFan wrote:I have YET to figure out how having some team come out of nowhere every year somehow makes a conference "better".

BTW, I have yet to figure out why Montana fans are the only BSC fans upset when the conference gets called out for being Montana and everyone else.

89Hen wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:I have YET to figure out how having some team come out of nowhere every year somehow makes a conference "better".

BTW, I have yet to figure out why Montana fans are the only BSC fans upset when the conference gets called out for being Montana and everyone else.

Didn't realize I was a Montana fan...

Another dumbass CAA fan who thinks he knows about football....Take away Flacco and Delaware wouldnt have even made it to the championship game and oh, how did those CAA teams do by the way when they made it