Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

1 William & Mary Tribe
2 Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens
3 Wofford Terriers
4 Appalachian State Mountaineers
5 Eastern Washington Eagles
6 Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks
7 Montana State Bobcats
8 Southeast Missouri State Redhawks
9 Jacksonville State Gamecocks
10 Bethune-Cookman Wildcats
11 Villanova Wildcats
12 Liberty Flames
13 Northern Iowa Panthers
14 Robert Morris Colonials
15 Massachusetts Minutemen
16 Cal Poly Mustangs
17 Montana Grizzlies
18 South Carolina State Bulldogs
19 New Hampshire Wildcats
20 Western Illinois Leathernecks
21 Grambling State Tigers
22 Chattanooga Mocs
23 Pennsylvania Quakers
24 North Dakota State Bison
25 Jacksonville Dolphins

Next 10 receiving points

26 Lehigh Mountain Hawks
27 Southern Utah Thunderbirds
28 Sacramento State Hornets
29 Georgia Southern Eagles
30 Richmond Spiders
31 Harvard Crimson
32 Furman Paladins
33 Weber State Wildcats
34 McNeese State Cowboys
35 Dayton Flyers

Robert Morris at 14? How many teams ranked 15-35 could Robert Morris beat? Maybe Jacksonville or Dayton?

Well, they did beat the #12 team.

Who got and how many #1 votes?

Gil Dobie wrote:Who got and how many #1 votes?

Inquiring minds want to know. Scheit, it was easier to declassify the Pentagon Papers than to find out how many voters the CS poll has.

It's actually really damn easy to find out how many voters there are, if you are a voter.

There are 57 registered voters.

clenz wrote:It's actually really damn easy to find out how many voters there are, if you are a voter.

There are 57 registered voters.

That clears it up, somewhat. But how were the first-place votes allocated this week?

Montana.

Ivytalk wrote:

clenz wrote:It's actually really damn easy to find out how many voters there are, if you are a voter.

There are 57 registered voters.

That clears it up, somewhat. But how were the first-place votes allocated this week?

PM Tman. You've made it abundantly clear that you have some bone of contention with the CS poll Ivy and I can't figure it out for the life of me. Good for you though cuz I really don't give a fuck I guess. We were just trying to build something from scratch here and we've taken good constructive criticism from the outset and tried to make things better as an ongoing way of doing things. You aren't a part of it but you want to sit back and lob shit at it? As I said...good for you.

Robert Morris is way too high, what's up with the NEC lovefest??

bluehenbillk wrote:Robert Morris is way too high, what's up with the NEC lovefest??

Definitely agree, they've been in my poll for a few weeks but it is going to take a playoff win or two to climb above 20.

What has Grambling done to deserve any votes? Yeah, they are winning a lot of close games in the SWAC, but that means less than winning games in the PFL.

SWAC has zero wins outside the HBCU circle, and those are one win against a weak Tenn State.

These people jumping on RMU being too high: what has Bethune Cookman done to be so high? How about SE MO St? Liberty?

It's the nature of the polls and especially this year.

clenz wrote:It's actually really damn easy to find out how many voters there are, if you are a voter.

There are 57 registered voters.

I'm a voter.

How would I know that?

CoachL wrote:

clenz wrote:It's actually really damn easy to find out how many voters there are, if you are a voter.

There are 57 registered voters.

I'm a voter.

How would I know that?

I think it's in the Poll forum Coach. I can't remember where I saw it a while back as it may have been in a post or you may be able to look on your user cp somewhere and it lists the people in that group.

Just figured it out Coach. If you go to your User CP and click on the tab "Usergroups" and then click the cs poll link it'll tell you exactly who is in that group.

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Just figured it out Coach. If you go to your User CP and click on the tab "Usergroups" and then click the cs poll link it'll tell you exactly who is in that group.

Wow. I had never clicked on that tab before.

I feel like such a Luddite!

CoachL wrote:

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Just figured it out Coach. If you go to your User CP and click on the tab "Usergroups" and then click the cs poll link it'll tell you exactly who is in that group.

Wow. I had never clicked on that tab before.

I feel like such a Luddite!

I obviously don't use it much either.

I knew there was a way to check it out but couldn't remember exactly so you made me sharpen my skillz there.

CoachL wrote:

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Just figured it out Coach. If you go to your User CP and click on the tab "Usergroups" and then click the cs poll link it'll tell you exactly who is in that group.

Wow. I had never clicked on that tab before.

I feel like such a Luddite!

I always wondered what the "L" in your username stood for.

^^^^I love that we just had a Luddite reference on this board.

SuperHornet wrote:Montana.

Seriously, if you're really doing this you should stop voting.

If travelinman could explain how the poll is calculated, that'd be pretty awesome. Does the CS.com system keep track of #1 votes, or does it simply make a calculation based on the ballots without tracking which teams got top votes? That could explain why our poll doesn't say how many #1 votes each team received.

∞∞∞ wrote:If travelinman could explain how the poll is calculated, that'd be pretty awesome. Does the CS.com system keep track of #1 votes, or does it simply make a calculation based on the ballots without tracking which teams got top votes? That could explain why our poll doesn't say how many #1 votes each team received.

I think it is based on a calculation that is more than just "This team got this many first place votes" and so on to help keep "homerism" down.

AZGrizFan wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:Montana.

Seriously, if you're really doing this you should stop voting.

He is seriously doing shit like that AZ. He had Sac #1, and Liberty #2 last week I think it was and the only reason he didn't have UM at #3 is because he forgot them completely. It's too bad that he won't take it seriously but we get by in spite of him trying to not help out the cause.

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Seriously, if you're really doing this you should stop voting.

He is seriously doing shit like that AZ. He had Sac #1, and Liberty #2 last week I think it was and the only reason he didn't have UM at #3 is because he forgot them completely. It's too bad that he won't take it seriously but we get by in spite of him trying to not help out the cause.

I was hoping he was just being a douche and putting out fake polls, actually doing a real voting. If he is actually turning in the shit he is posting something NEEDS to be done, regardless how "wrong" it may be.