Page 1 of 1
My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 4:52 pm
by EWURanger
via egriz.com..........
dub-foncy wrote:You guys do know that the Big Sky is just as bad as it has always been and UM is just making a bunch of bad teams look good right? Every single Big Sky team is going to get their clock cleaned in their first round this year.
Do you people even watch FCS football? I know for a fact that you don't. The top 6 CAA teams would blank ANY of the Western teams this year. This is one of the deepest playoffs fields in the history of the division and it's obviously not due to the Big Fluffy Sky.
App State would beat EWU by 70 points at least. App State has a legit shot at beating Florida this year. Watch a FCS game for once, yokels.
Seriously, if you yokels that think FCS is so awesome would actually watch a game for once, you might learn something.
The Big Sky will not have a single non-Big Sky win in the playoffs this year. Not only that, but it's possible that the Big Sky will only get one team in. MSU could EASILY lose out, that would eliminate them. If UM loses to UND they are eliminated, even if they beat MSU the following week. Weber needs to win TWO of the following to qualify for the playoffs, MSU, NAU, and Texas Tech - NOT HAPPENING! You guys know who has the best chance of getting an at-large bid in the Big Fluffy this year? Sac State! But even they would have to win all three of the following: ISU, PSU, and Davis - not impossible.
This Big Fluffy Sky is its same old J-o-K-e self.
Montana fans won't even claim this guy.
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:07 pm
by SuperHornet
I thought I was the crazy one around here. Sac has a better chance at an at-large than the Griz? As much as I'd love to accept that statement, Sac is toast. The best we can do is 7-4, and one of those wins doesn't count.
Sac is unfortunately toast even if they win out. We can't even get the autobid in the event of a multi-way tie; the Kitties get the duke on that one.
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:17 pm
by weberwildcat
It was a dumb post but it wouldnt even make the top 500 on this forum. Also ASU would beat EWU because the game would be in Boon and not Cheney, but not by 70 of course. I would make fun of him for saying ASU would beat Florida but then I remember 5th ranked Michigan in front of 110,000 fans.
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:37 pm
by Mike Johnson
Sorry, Weberwildcat, but you are going to need to take off the South Dakota logo.
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:42 pm
by Willie
dub, djollieballs, whatever you want to call him is a megacunt.
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 6:05 pm
by siuham
Willie wrote:dub, djollieballs, whatever you want to call him is a megacunt.
A....Thundercunt if you will?
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 6:22 pm
by Screamin_Eagle174
SuperHornet wrote:I thought I was the crazy one around here. Sac has a better chance at an at-large than the Griz? As much as I'd love to accept that statement, Sac is toast. The best we can do is 7-4, and one of those wins doesn't count.
Sac is unfortunately toast even if they win out. We can't even get the autobid in the event of a multi-way tie; the Kitties get the duke on that one.
You are the crazy one around here... because thankfully djdouchecunt aka dub foncy posts over on eGriztards.
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 6:33 pm
by jd of de
This post. Post this in the off season I would find another "winner", but there is a season happening guy.
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 6:52 pm
by BlueHen86
SuperHornet wrote:I thought I was the crazy one around here. Sac has a better chance at an at-large than the Griz? As much as I'd love to accept that statement, Sac is toast. The best we can do is 7-4, and one of those wins doesn't count.
Sac is unfortunately toast even if they win out. We can't even get the autobid in the event of a multi-way tie; the Kitties get the duke on that one.
Don't worry, you are. This guy just got lucky with this post, he is a one hit wonder. You are the Beatles.
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:45 pm
by Skjellyfetti
Seriously. That's just ridiculous.
75+ minimum.
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:31 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Dumbest Post of the Year?
I don't think this would even make the Top-10 Dumbest Posts of the Year on egriz, much less Dumbest Post of the Year overall.
That site has become a lunatic asylum.
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:30 pm
by SeattleGriz
EWURanger wrote:via egriz.com..........
dub-foncy wrote:You guys do know that the Big Sky is just as bad as it has always been and UM is just making a bunch of bad teams look good right? Every single Big Sky team is going to get their clock cleaned in their first round this year.
Do you people even watch FCS football? I know for a fact that you don't. The top 6 CAA teams would blank ANY of the Western teams this year. This is one of the deepest playoffs fields in the history of the division and it's obviously not due to the Big Fluffy Sky.
App State would beat EWU by 70 points at least. App State has a legit shot at beating Florida this year. Watch a FCS game for once, yokels.
Seriously, if you yokels that think FCS is so awesome would actually watch a game for once, you might learn something.
The Big Sky will not have a single non-Big Sky win in the playoffs this year. Not only that, but it's possible that the Big Sky will only get one team in. MSU could EASILY lose out, that would eliminate them. If UM loses to UND they are eliminated, even if they beat MSU the following week. Weber needs to win TWO of the following to qualify for the playoffs, MSU, NAU, and Texas Tech - NOT HAPPENING! You guys know who has the best chance of getting an at-large bid in the Big Fluffy this year? Sac State! But even they would have to win all three of the following: ISU, PSU, and Davis - not impossible.
This Big Fluffy Sky is its same old J-o-K-e self.
Montana fans won't even claim this guy.
I don't think he is actually a Montana fan.
My personal belief is that he is some guy that went to U of M for undergrad and then finished up school at the U of Washington. I could be wrong, but he has the same sort of vibe as the guy I described.
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:19 am
by EWURanger
Willie wrote:dub, djollieballs, whatever you want to call him is a megacunt.
One might even say, "turbocunt".
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 5:22 am
by ASUG8
I don't think he's one of our guys, but if so I'll apologize on his behalf. What a douche.
Plus, everybody knows playing through the SoCon this year like beating up grannies, right?
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:59 am
by BigSkyBears
I nominate Super Whornet because she kept insisting Colorado School of Mines should join the Big Sky. That thread was killer. Dumbest post of the year.
Re: My nomination for the "dumbest post of the year" award
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:01 am
by BigSkyBears
I forgot Djnoballs was on CS.COM. I was hoping that kid would just stay on egriz. Dumb little kid.