Page 1 of 2

Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:16 pm
by clenz
1 Appalachian State Mountaineers
2 William & Mary Tribe
3 Jacksonville State Gamecocks
4 Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens
5 Villanova Wildcats
6 Wofford Terriers
7 Eastern Washington Eagles
8 Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks
9 Southeast Missouri State Redhawks
10 Montana State Bobcats
11 Bethune-Cookman Wildcats
12 New Hampshire Wildcats
13 Northern Iowa Panthers
14 Liberty Flames
15 Massachusetts Minutemen
16 Robert Morris Colonials
17 Montana Grizzlies
18 South Carolina State Bulldogs
19 Cal Poly Mustangs
20 Western Illinois Leathernecks
21 Chattanooga Mocs
22 Grambling State Tigers
23 Pennsylvania Quakers
24 North Dakota State Bison
25 Jacksonville Dolphins

Next 10 receiving points

26 Weber State Wildcats
27 James Madison Dukes
28 Sacramento State Hornets
29 Richmond Spiders
30 Harvard Crimson
31 Lehigh Mountain Hawks
32 Southern Utah Thunderbirds
33 Indiana State Sycamores
34 Furman Paladins
35 Dayton Flyers

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:17 pm
by Ursus A. Horribilis
Sorry clenzy, didn't see you had this up already.

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:17 pm
by clenz
I think you may have beaten me by about 2 seconds. Both said 4:16 PM

:lol:

Yours showed up under my in the "new post" area.


:oops:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:18 pm
by Ursus A. Horribilis
clenz wrote:I think you may have beaten me by about 2 seconds. Both said 4:16 PM

:lol:

Yours showed up under my in the "new post" area.


:oops:
That's exactly what happened to me. I just went and deleted mine. :thumb:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:51 pm
by AZGrizFan
Not enough love for SUU. Their four losses are 2 close losses to FBS teams, a ranked NAU and a ranked Texas State.

Also #'s 26-30 could whoop up on #'s 21-25. :nod: :nod: :nod:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:52 pm
by EWURanger
AZGrizFan wrote:Also #'s 26-30 could whoop up on #'s 21-25. :nod: :nod: :nod:
Without a doubt. :nod:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:56 pm
by Col Hogan
EWURanger wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:Also #'s 26-30 could whoop up on #'s 21-25. :nod: :nod: :nod:
Without a doubt. :nod:
:nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:07 pm
by 93henfan
clenz wrote: 16 Robert Morris Colonials
17 Montana Grizzlies
I lol'ed.

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:22 pm
by AZGrizFan
93henfan wrote:
clenz wrote: 16 Robert Morris Colonials
17 Montana Grizzlies
I lol'ed.
I had RM @ 13 and UM @ 22. :coffee:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:24 pm
by 93henfan
AZGrizFan wrote:
93henfan wrote:
I lol'ed.
I had RM @ 13 and UM @ 22. :coffee:
I wasn't laughing at the logic, but rather the situation. Will the Griz actually miss a home game in the playoffs? :shock:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:25 pm
by AZGrizFan
93henfan wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
I had RM @ 13 and UM @ 22. :coffee:
I wasn't laughing at the logic, but rather the situation. Will the Griz actually miss a home game in the playoffs? :shock:
The real question is will the griz miss the playoffs? :coffee: :coffee:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:51 pm
by Grizalltheway
93henfan wrote:
clenz wrote: 16 Robert Morris Colonials
17 Montana Grizzlies
I lol'ed.
I :puke: 'd.

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:20 pm
by SDHornet
93henfan wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
I had RM @ 13 and UM @ 22. :coffee:
I wasn't laughing at the logic, but rather the situation. Will the Griz actually miss a home game in the playoffs? :shock:
Not if they get 7 D1 wins. They make too much $$$ for the NCAA to not host a game.

And Weber ahead of Sac State? I though the CS poll was credible. :ohno:
I guess similarly we'll jump into the top 20 if we beat PSU and ISU back to back. :roll:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:33 pm
by siuham
SDHornet wrote:
93henfan wrote:
I wasn't laughing at the logic, but rather the situation. Will the Griz actually miss a home game in the playoffs? :shock:
Not if they get 7 D1 wins. They make too much $$$ for the NCAA to not host a game.

And Weber ahead of Sac State? I though the CS poll was credible. :ohno:
I guess similarly we'll jump into the top 20 if we beat PSU and ISU back to back. :roll:
Or Weber is 5-2 against FCS compared to 3-3.

I didn't rank either. But you Sac State posters are getting ridiculous.

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:47 pm
by SuperHornet
siuham wrote:
SDHornet wrote: Not if they get 7 D1 wins. They make too much $$$ for the NCAA to not host a game.

And Weber ahead of Sac State? I though the CS poll was credible. :ohno:
I guess similarly we'll jump into the top 20 if we beat PSU and ISU back to back. :roll:
Or Weber is 5-2 against FCS compared to 3-3.

I didn't rank either. But you Sac State posters are getting ridiculous.
Why do you dummies keep confusing my compatriots with me? I'm the myopian of the bunch. They're a bit more levelheaded.

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:49 pm
by siuham
SuperHornet wrote:
siuham wrote:
Or Weber is 5-2 against FCS compared to 3-3.

I didn't rank either. But you Sac State posters are getting ridiculous.
Why do you dummies keep confusing my compatriots with me? I'm the myopian of the bunch. They're a bit more levelheaded.
Dismissing an entire poll for a team being two spots ahead of another team...when at this point in the season, the one lower is .500 compared to being 5-2...

People need to get real and stop worrying about their team alone and look at more than that.

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:02 pm
by Gil Dobie
AZGrizFan wrote:Not enough love for SUU. Their four losses are 2 close losses to FBS teams, a ranked NAU and a ranked Texas State.

Also #'s 26-30 could whoop up on #'s 21-25. :nod: :nod: :nod:
.............and #17 :nod:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:50 pm
by ToTheLeft
UNH and Sac State fans lately can't see the forest for the trees. They get so mad that "We beat WeberMass! We deserve a better ranking than them!" and everyone else says "Yeah but you lost to GrizIsland, stop crying!"

It's about body of work. Not everyone is sold because you beat a conference team by a few points. It doesn't erase your 3 conference losses and/or losses to two of the worst teams in your conference. :thumb:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:53 pm
by SDHornet
siuham wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:
Why do you dummies keep confusing my compatriots with me? I'm the myopian of the bunch. They're a bit more levelheaded.
Dismissing an entire poll for a team being two spots ahead of another team...when at this point in the season, the one lower is .500 compared to being 5-2...

People need to get real and stop worrying about their team alone and look at more than that.
OK so my response was well over the top, the CS poll is by far the best and obviously I overreacted. I understand WSU had a huge win at home against a UM who has been living life on the edge this season, but let’s be real, WSU still has some tough opponents ahead of them. Their recent BSC wins are against 2 bottom teams and another one of their wins was a close multiple overtime win against UNC…at home. Let me say that again, UNC, a team that just got curb stomped by South Dakota. I’m not saying WSU isn’t good, but their complete body of work doesn’t justify jumping Sac State at this moment. If WSU wins out, then yes I will have no complaints….of course if Sac State wins out then we are back to square one.

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:54 pm
by SDHornet
ToTheLeft wrote:UNH and Sac State fans lately can't see the forest for the trees. They get so mad that "We beat WeberMass! We deserve a better ranking than them!" and everyone else says "Yeah but you lost to GrizIsland, stop crying!"

It's about body of work. Not everyone is sold because you beat a conference team by a few points. It doesn't erase your 3 conference losses and/or losses to two of the worst teams in your conference. :thumb:
Shouldn’t you be worrying and posting something about how great RMU is? :coffee: :roll:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:56 pm
by SDHornet
One more thing siuham…damn I forgot, I was distracted by your avatar. :lol:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:00 pm
by ToTheLeft
SDHornet wrote:
ToTheLeft wrote:UNH and Sac State fans lately can't see the forest for the trees. They get so mad that "We beat WeberMass! We deserve a better ranking than them!" and everyone else says "Yeah but you lost to GrizIsland, stop crying!"

It's about body of work. Not everyone is sold because you beat a conference team by a few points. It doesn't erase your 3 conference losses and/or losses to two of the worst teams in your conference. :thumb:
Shouldn’t you be worrying and posting something about how great RMU is? :coffee: :roll:
I was going to include something in my post preemptively dismissing an attack on Liberty to deflect from the topic at hand.

Glad to see I was right. :thumb:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:04 pm
by SDHornet
ToTheLeft wrote:
SDHornet wrote: Shouldn’t you be worrying and posting something about how great RMU is? :coffee: :roll:
I was going to include something in my post preemptively dismissing an attack on Liberty to deflect from the topic at hand.

Glad to see I was right. :thumb:
C'mon this is CS.com. You should have known that wouldn't work. :lol:

And I have nothing against Liberty (except all the posters that came on board just for the elimination game this off-season :ohno: ), I just felt like throwing a little zinger out there. Best of luck the rest of the season and good luck in the playoffs. :thumb:

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:21 pm
by ToTheLeft
SDHornet wrote:
ToTheLeft wrote:
I was going to include something in my post preemptively dismissing an attack on Liberty to deflect from the topic at hand.

Glad to see I was right. :thumb:
C'mon this is CS.com. You should have known that wouldn't work. :lol:

And I have nothing against Liberty (except all the posters that came on board just for the elimination game this off-season :ohno: ), I just felt like throwing a little zinger out there. Best of luck the rest of the season and good luck in the playoffs. :thumb:
*knocks on wood* Thanks.

It's all good. I was actually expecting it from clenzy, didn't think any Sac fans would take the bait.

Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:27 pm
by siuham
SDHornet wrote:
siuham wrote:
Dismissing an entire poll for a team being two spots ahead of another team...when at this point in the season, the one lower is .500 compared to being 5-2...

People need to get real and stop worrying about their team alone and look at more than that.
OK so my response was well over the top, the CS poll is by far the best and obviously I overreacted. I understand WSU had a huge win at home against a UM who has been living life on the edge this season, but let’s be real, WSU still has some tough opponents ahead of them. Their recent BSC wins are against 2 bottom teams and another one of their wins was a close multiple overtime win against UNC…at home. Let me say that again, UNC, a team that just got curb stomped by South Dakota. I’m not saying WSU isn’t good, but their complete body of work doesn’t justify jumping Sac State at this moment. If WSU wins out, then yes I will have no complaints….of course if Sac State wins out then we are back to square one.
But honestly, you can't be surprised to see WSU get more votes after being Montana, which 90% of the voting base has some sick fetish-esque love for.