Page 1 of 2
Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 2:01 am
by weberwildcat
Doesn't matter who coaches the Griz they keep winning titles. kinda like weber basketball or nau x country as long as there is a decent coach the banners keep coming.
the point of this thread...
The 2010 season will be each schools last chance to beat the Griz. They will be in the WAC in 2011 and no longer a part of this forum.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 2:04 am
by weberwildcat
can weber do it? will cam higgins keep his picks down? will he have a worthy supporting cast?
can nau be relevent with a new qb?
we know about ewu's running back but will they have a good qb so they can contend for a title? nichols graduated. red turf will be pretty cool but not sure if thats gonna help them win, then again look at boise maybe the blood rug will help.
msu have an offense to win a title?
i dont know enuf about sac, psu...
will unc rise up next year???
isu? LOL
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:04 am
by dbackjon
Why do you think they will be in the WAC in 2011? The moratorium hasn't even been lifted...
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:12 am
by DukeJack
And Herrick will be a senior....we may have questions about who's going to catch the ball, but qb play will not be an issue for the Jacks.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:18 am
by grizzaholic
And again. Another BULLSHIT rumor thread.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:54 am
by SuperHornet
grizzaholic wrote:And again. Another BULLSHIT rumor thread.
Maybe so, but at least it isn't that arrogant "you're done because I SAID SO" trash a VERY FEW EWU fans tried to foist on us.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:09 am
by BigSkyBears
Weber, why did you have to start this shit again. I don't go to egriz any more because that's all they write about, moving up. I don't want cs.com to be the same, so stop. It's a tired subject and redundant.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:13 am
by grizzaholic
BigSkyBears wrote:Weber, why did you have to start this shit again. I don't go to egriz any more because that's all they write about, moving up. I don't want cs.com to be the same, so stop. It's a tired subject and redundant.
Now that is a good post!

Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:14 am
by danefan
At least put these threads in the smack/rumors forum................
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:19 am
by grizzaholic
danefan wrote:At least put these threads in the smack/rumors forum................
No shit.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:20 am
by Herky
grizzaholic wrote:BigSkyBears wrote:Weber, why did you have to start this **** again. I don't go to egriz any more because that's all they write about, moving up. I don't want cs.com to be the same, so stop. It's a tired subject and redundant.
Now that is a good post!


Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:00 am
by weberwildcat
1. i havent been on this forum for along time.
2. i keep seeing article after article online talking about all the conf moves that are supposedly gonna happen and all the articles talk about montana moving up.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:02 am
by grizzaholic
weberwildcat wrote:1. i havent been on this forum for along time.
2. i keep seeing article after article online talking about all the conf moves that are supposedly gonna happen and all the articles talk about montana moving up.
GO to EGRIZ if you want to talk about Montana moving up.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:04 am
by BigSkyBears
weberwildcat wrote:1. i havent been on this forum for along time.
2. i keep seeing article after article online talking about all the conf moves that are supposedly gonna happen and all the articles talk about montana moving up.
No excuses dude, there's probably one on here every week about the griz moving up. Just pay attention and let this be a last warning for you.

Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:05 am
by weberwildcat
here's one of many articles.
http://www.obnug.com/2010/2/26/1327569/ ... nalysis-of" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
this one is actaully kinda funny it mentions Idaho St and C. Washington as candidates to move up lol
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:30 am
by BigSkyBears
What did we just get done telling you???? LEAVE IT ALONE!!!
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:34 am
by Ursus A. Horribilis
BigSkyBears wrote:
What did we just get done telling you???? LEAVE IT ALONE!!!
Couldn't agree more but what are we gonna do, people keep bringing it up. Let's try and ignore it and hope it goes away.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:35 pm
by blazerbird
Ooooh. I can't resist hijacking this thread. Here goes.
Oh my God! I have a really good friend who's tight with the Griz AD and Prez. He said he overheard a recent conversation in which the two discussed the Griz moving to the PAC 10 NEXT YEAR! Basically, the UM is leaving the Big Sky because they realize that NAU, EWU, MSU, and WSU are going to be waaaaay too competitive. Especially Eastern with the red turf and all. Anyway, just as a reminder, Bobby Hauck is still a crappy or amazing coach, and the new guy will be super successful or a failure.
There, that should be good for five or ten pages of useless posts. Carry on.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:41 pm
by dbackjon
blazerbird wrote:Ooooh. I can't resist hijacking this thread. Here goes.
Oh my God! I have a really good friend who's tight with the Griz AD and Prez. He said he overheard a recent conversation in which the two discussed the Griz moving to the PAC 10 NEXT YEAR! Basically, the UM is leaving the Big Sky because they realize that NAU, EWU, MSU, and WSU are going to be waaaaay too competitive. Especially Eastern with the red turf and all. Anyway, just as a reminder, Bobby Hauck is still a crappy or amazing coach, and the new guy will be super successful or a failure.
There, that should be good for five or ten pages of useless posts. Carry on.
Well, NAU is being invited to the Mountain West conference because it is halfway between UNLV and New Mexico.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:46 pm
by Montanan
bump

Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:10 pm
by weberwildcat
moving up isnt as bad as yall think. are there any UM fans on here that are for the move up? i cant believe you dont think UM would rule the WAC. how honestly would be beating down UM? besides UM could move up again there after if the Mtn Wst doesnt crumble.
i understand the "competing for national titles" arguement which of course isnt hte case at WSU, but if there was a poll to move up at WSU you wouldn't see any voters to stay big sky. but we also have the issue of being the only FCS with 3 FBS close by. SUU is so far away...they get dis'd.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:53 pm
by Willie
weberwildcat wrote:moving up isnt as bad as yall think. are there any UM fans on here that are for the move up? i cant believe you dont think UM would rule the WAC. how honestly would be beating down UM? besides UM could move up again there after if the Mtn Wst doesnt crumble.
i understand the "competing for national titles" arguement which of course isnt hte case at WSU, but if there was a poll to move up at WSU you wouldn't see any voters to stay big sky. but we also have the issue of being the only FCS with 3 FBS close by. SUU is so far away...they get dis'd.
I would like to see them move up some day. But not some day soon. I mean I'd absolutely love to see the Griz play the likes of Ohio State, and Wisconsin and Minnesota, etc...
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:21 pm
by MrTitleist
BigSkyBears wrote:Weber, why did you have to start this **** again. I don't go to egriz any more because that's all they write about, moving up. I don't want cs.com to be the same, so stop. It's a tired subject and redundant.
I thought you stopped posting on eGriz because you opened your mouth in the Future of the WAC thread then couldn't defend yourself against Kemajic and Spanky.
Regardless, UM will not be in the WAC in 2011.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:59 pm
by BigSkyBears
MrTitleist wrote:BigSkyBears wrote:Weber, why did you have to start this **** again. I don't go to egriz any more because that's all they write about, moving up. I don't want cs.com to be the same, so stop. It's a tired subject and redundant.
I thought you stopped posting on eGriz because you opened your mouth in the Future of the WAC thread then couldn't defend yourself against Kemajic and Spanky.
Regardless, UM will not be in the WAC in 2011.
This is dumb. It's not worth arguing. I'm finished with cs.com too. I've waisted too much time and would rather spend time with my wife or read a book. Some of you spend way too much time with on-line communities. And then, I see people like Ursas who's probably a nice guy in real life but thinks he has to be an internet bad-ass. Ursas has really opened my eyes. This is just dumb. Peace out everyone.
Re: Griz Reign Isnt Over....BUT,
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:58 pm
by Ursus A. Horribilis
BigSkyBears wrote:MrTitleist wrote:
I thought you stopped posting on eGriz because you opened your mouth in the Future of the WAC thread then couldn't defend yourself against Kemajic and Spanky.
Regardless, UM will not be in the WAC in 2011.
This is dumb. It's not worth arguing. I'm finished with cs.com too. I've waisted too much time and would rather spend time with my wife or read a book. Some of you spend way too much time with on-line communities. And then, I see people like Ursas who's probably a nice guy in real life but thinks he has to be an internet bad-ass. Ursas has really opened my eyes. This is just dumb. Peace out everyone.
You can ask anyone on here that has met me...I am the same guy in real life as I am on the board. I am a nice guy but if you wanna take shots for no reason or can't handle the push back when you do then you ain't gonna like me much. I've never once threatened you physically in any way so you can keep on with your perception of what an internet bad ass/tough guy is but I guarantee you that shit you say would not go untested in person either. The only weapon that can be used on the message board is you wit, and your mind in general and if you feel that I have mentally been bullying you around then you better spend a lot more time with the books and less with the wife.
Sincerely, sorry you are leaving and I don't want you take it personally cuz I don't mean for you to have bad feelings over your time here but it looks like you do. If you decide to stay (I hope you do) then you are just gonna have to be willing to be counter punched when you start throwing haymakers. Peace.