D1B wrote:
Eugenics is not the subject, Z. He completely whiffed, right off the bat. To use his boxing theme, he tripped and broke his wrist in the lockerroom before the fight.
Also, he
cut and pasted a "manifesto". Unneccessary and lame.
.
Sorry, Pussy...you lose your appeal.
Eugenics IS the issue. Population control has NEVER been about the world's resources. According to early 20th century eugenicists, the issue of environmental quality was ADDED as the "carrot" to further their agenda. Huxley's speech to the Galtonian Society cited a global capacity of 500 million inhabitants before bio-system stress resulted in cataclysmic (apocalyptic) starvation and shortages. Since the global population is well over ten times that "cataclysmic" threshhold (6.8 billion), while food shortages and starvation do exist in some parts of third world undeveloped regions, those shortages ARE NOT DUE TO THE PLANET'S INABILITY TO PRODUCE OR SUSTAIN LIFE, BUT RATHER HAVE RESULTED FROM MAN'S CONSCIOUS REFUSAL TO MANAGE THE EARTH'S RESOURCES.
And folks like yourself, D1B, who impede and obstruct all attempts by humanity to industrialize and manage the earth's resources, are the chief culprit that ANY shortages or starvation exists today.
Moreso, I'll assert that these actions to obstruct quality of life improvements (read: manage resources), emanate from THE desire to ultimately single out specific classes of people for subjugation, if not extinction.
To review...folks who have been the chief salespeople of "population control":
Adolf Hitler
Adolf Eichmann
Josef Mengele
Charles Darwin
Margaret Sanger
Julian Huxley
John D. Rockefeller Jr.
Rachel Carson
Richard Nixon
Henry Kissinger
Gao Xiao Duan
Every one of them have earned legacies of either overt cultural/socioeconomic class hate, or outright attempts to eliminate a racial or ethnic group they felt was inferior...
...in other words, practicing eugenicists.
Your foolish insistence this is about a shortage of global resources is as ignorant a position as the continued insistence that any climate pattern changes are anthropomorphic in cause: Not only scientifically unsupportable, but revealing the superficiality of the believer's logic.
Finally, as to your "cut and paste" allegation...
...you of all people, should be the least "offended" by such journalistic shortcuts. For someone as yourself, who has only RARELY ever sourced any secondary or scientific sourcing (for obvious reason) to support your glue-sniffer, ether-worldly, nonsensical if not wholly self destructive, "theories"
, you would be wise to limit your criticism of other (more thoughtful) posters.