Trump's Secret Documents. The World awaits.

[kalm]

Still waiting for Medico-fascist Klam to tell us what the fuck was his problem during COVID. His stance killed millions and affected millions.

I’m busy assembling my gangs of brown shirt scientists.

[SeattleGriz]

Still waiting for Medico-fascist Klam to tell us what the fuck was his problem during COVID. His stance killed millions and affected millions.

I’m busy assembling my gangs of brown shirt scientists.

I don't doubt it. You were catastrophically wrong, and the fact you don't care to apologize for your ignorance is telling. You're stance killed and injured untold millions and you act all smug? Immoral piece of shit.

[UNI88]

I’m busy assembling my gangs of brown shirt scientists.

I don't doubt it. You were catastrophically wrong, and the fact you don't care to apologize for your ignorance is telling. You're stance killed and injured untold millions and you act all smug? Immoral piece of shit.

He doesn’t care to apologize, his ignorance his telling, he’s a smug, immoral piece of shit? kalm sounds a lot like trump. You should worship him.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Caribbean Hen]

Yeah, sure.

Those morals caused untold damage on Americans during COVID. Not sure that's the angle you want to go with.

Our idiotic government response to Covid caused damage. Millions of lives.
In hindsight, we would’ve been better off if we did absolutely nothing

FYP

[houndawg]

I don't doubt it. You were catastrophically wrong, and the fact you don't care to apologize for your ignorance is telling. You're stance killed and injured untold millions and you act all smug? Immoral piece of shit.

He doesn’t care to apologize, his ignorance his telling, he’s a smug, immoral piece of shit? kalm sounds a lot like trump. You should worship him.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think he does, you can tell by how flustered he gets when his hero gently corrects his various misconceptions, irl he's blushing and geting wet as he reads

[kalm]

He doesn’t care to apologize, his ignorance his telling, he’s a smug, immoral piece of shit? kalm sounds a lot like trump. You should worship him.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think he does, you can tell by how flustered he gets when his hero gently corrects his various misconceptions, irl he's blushing and geting wet as he reads

[UNI88]

I think he does, you can tell by how flustered he gets when his hero gently corrects his various misconceptions, irl he's blushing and geting wet as he reads

Don’t play coy. You’re dreaming of a long, romantic kayak trip with SG.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kalm]

Don’t play coy. You’re dreaming of a long, romantic kayak trip with SG.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

MOST RECENT ACTIVITY: Two days ago, Trump’s legal team filed a beefy 68-page Motion to Compel Discovery against the government, including a detailed, two-page table of contents. The Motion alleged that the government — i.e. the special counsel — has been playing games with discovery, has withheld documents, has over-redacted, and has not handed over exculpatory evidence.

[houndawg]

MOST RECENT ACTIVITY: Two days ago, Trump’s legal team filed a beefy 68-page Motion to Compel Discovery against the government, including a detailed, two-page table of contents. The Motion alleged that the government — i.e. the special counsel — has been playing games with discovery, has withheld documents, has over-redacted, and has not handed over exculpatory evidence.

startling news...

[kalm]

startling news...

Dude! It included a two-page table of contents!!!

[houndawg]

startling news...

Dude! It included a two-page table of contents!!!

And encrypted files!

[UNI88]

MOST RECENT ACTIVITY: Two days ago, Trump’s legal team filed a beefy 68-page Motion to Compel Discovery against the government, including a detailed, two-page table of contents. The Motion alleged that the government — i.e. the special counsel — has been playing games with discovery, has withheld documents, has over-redacted, and has not handed over exculpatory evidence.

[SeattleGriz]

You saying this didn't happen? It's not biased one way or another, just an update to a thread that has languished due to inactivity.

Me thinks you were saving this "card" and busted it out the first chance you had without realizing it doesn't apply.

Fail

[UNI88]

You saying this didn't happen? It's not biased one way or another, just an update to a thread that has languished due to inactivity.

Me thinks you were saving this "card" and busted it out the first chance you had without realizing it doesn't apply.

Fail

You posted a quote with no link. I don't know if it happened or not. And before you resort to calling me lazy, I tried to google the whole quote and various parts and didn't get anything substantial. Count me skeptical that it happened as described.

[SeattleGriz]

You saying this didn't happen? It's not biased one way or another, just an update to a thread that has languished due to inactivity.

Me thinks you were saving this "card" and busted it out the first chance you had without realizing it doesn't apply.

Fail

You posted a quote with no link. I don't know if it happened or not. And before you resort to calling me lazy, I tried to google the whole quote and various parts and didn't get anything substantial. Count me skeptical that it happened as described.

We've been through this. You don't read links and when you do, it's always to try and ad hominem and attack the author instead of addressing substance.

Your Google skills suck.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/16/us/p ... gence.html

[UNI88]

You posted a quote with no link. I don't know if it happened or not. And before you resort to calling me lazy, I tried to google the whole quote and various parts and didn't get anything substantial. Count me skeptical that it happened as described.

We've been through this. You don't read links and when you do, it's always to try and ad hominem and attack the author instead of addressing substance.

Your Google skills suck.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/16/us/p ... gence.html

I read links but my reading comprehension is better than yours so I interpret articles with less bias than you do.

Ironic, the king of ad hominem attacks is whining about his sources being the victim of ad hominem attacks.

Registration required. You're saying what you quoted came directly from the NY Times article you just linked to?

[clenz]

We've been through this. You don't read links and when you do, it's always to try and ad hominem and attack the author instead of addressing substance.

Your Google skills suck.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/16/us/p ... gence.html

I read links but my reading comprehension is better than yours so I interpret articles with less bias than you do.

Ironic, the king of ad hominem attacks is whining about his sources being the victim of ad hominem attacks.

Registration required. You're saying what you quoted came directly from the NY Times article you just linked to?

Are you asking if

MOST RECENT ACTIVITY: Two days ago, Trump’s legal team filed a beefy 68-page Motion to Compel Discovery against the government, including a detailed, two-page table of contents. The Motion alleged that the government — i.e. the special counsel — has been playing games with discovery, has withheld documents, has over-redacted, and has not handed over exculpatory evidence.

is a direct quote from the NYT article?

If so the answer is not even fucking close.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

I read links but my reading comprehension is better than yours so I interpret articles with less bias than you do.

Ironic, the king of ad hominem attacks is whining about his sources being the victim of ad hominem attacks.

Registration required. You're saying what you quoted came directly from the NY Times article you just linked to?

Are you asking if

MOST RECENT ACTIVITY: Two days ago, Trump’s legal team filed a beefy 68-page Motion to Compel Discovery against the government, including a detailed, two-page table of contents. The Motion alleged that the government — i.e. the special counsel — has been playing games with discovery, has withheld documents, has over-redacted, and has not handed over exculpatory evidence.

is a direct quote from the NYT article?

If so the answer is not even fucking close.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And? Does it not convey the contents of the article? Is it incorrect?

I read a lot of aggregator sites.

[SeattleGriz]

We've been through this. You don't read links and when you do, it's always to try and ad hominem and attack the author instead of addressing substance.

Your Google skills suck.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/16/us/p ... gence.html

I read links but my reading comprehension is better than yours so I interpret articles with less bias than you do.

Ironic, the king of ad hominem attacks is whining about his sources being the victim of ad hominem attacks.

Registration required. You're saying what you quoted came directly from the NY Times article you just linked to?

No registration required for me. You must have used up all your free articles. I never said it came from the NY Times, but if you can't find a topic so simple as that...

[UNI88]

I read links but my reading comprehension is better than yours so I interpret articles with less bias than you do.

Ironic, the king of ad hominem attacks is whining about his sources being the victim of ad hominem attacks.

Registration required. You're saying what you quoted came directly from the NY Times article you just linked to?

No registration required for me. You must have used up all your free articles. I never said it came from the NY Times, but if you can't find a topic so simple as that...

I'm asking for a link to what you quoted. Can you provide it?

[SeattleGriz]

Holy hell. Retained and disclosed classified documents. Damn Trump...er, Biden.

[houndawg]

I read links but my reading comprehension is better than yours so I interpret articles with less bias than you do.

Ironic, the king of ad hominem attacks is whining about his sources being the victim of ad hominem attacks.

Registration required. You're saying what you quoted came directly from the NY Times article you just linked to?

No registration required for me. You must have used up all your free articles. I never said it came from the NY Times, but if you can't find a topic so simple as that...

So....."no"?

[clenz]

Holy hell. Retained and disclosed classified documents. Damn Trump...er, Biden.

Good. Investigate. Prosecute.

Unlike the MAGA cult we don't give a fuck if Biden - or any poiltician - goes to jail.

[SeattleGriz]

Holy hell. Retained and disclosed classified documents. Damn Trump...er, Biden.

Good. Investigate. Prosecute.

Unlike the MAGA cult we don't give a fuck if Biden - or any poiltician - goes to jail.

Too late. No charges brought for a guy who willfully retained and disclosed, meaning he knew he had them and knew he was letting other unauthorized see them.

You don't care because you knew they already let Joey Rotten off.