Page 2 of 20
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2022 7:14 am
by SeattleGriz
houndawg wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:46 am
SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 3:47 pm
She'd man handle Kristol.
You see her do those 10 palm forward pull ups when visiting the Marines? Snap AOC in half as a warm up.
Any Republican can do that shit when they're freshly watered. Wait until she hasn't been watered for a week and then see how she does.
Houndie's afraid of a strong woman! She'd beat you down boy.
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2022 2:28 pm
by houndawg
SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 7:14 am
houndawg wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:46 am
Any Republican can do that shit when they're freshly watered. Wait until she hasn't been watered for a week and then see how she does.
Houndie's afraid of a strong woman! She'd beat you down boy.
Not a problem. I'll give her the E-ticket for Uncle Houndawg's Rodeo of Love and she'll be baking cookies and cleaning house and watching Pati's Mexican Kitchen for something to fix me for supper.
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2022 6:17 am
by Ivytalk
Anything said by Madison Cawthorn (the guy NC Congressman with a girl’s name) is cringeworthy.
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2022 7:12 am
by HI54UNI
Ivytalk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 31, 2022 6:17 am
Anything said by Madison Cawthorn (the guy NC Congressman with a girl’s name) is cringeworthy.
But he was invited to an orgy!
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2022 8:33 am
by Ivytalk
HI54UNI wrote: ↑Thu Mar 31, 2022 7:12 am
Ivytalk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 31, 2022 6:17 am
Anything said by Madison Cawthorn (the guy NC Congressman with a girl’s name) is cringeworthy.
But he was invited to an orgy!
Umm, yeahhh….Now, where are those TPS reports?
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2022 8:59 am
by CID1990
Ivytalk wrote:Anything said by Madison Cawthorn (the guy NC Congressman with a girl’s name) is cringeworthy.
I just looked this guy up and all I can say is WTF?
How the hell does this guy even get elected? His only experience at anything is being on Meadows’ staff. I get that he’s from a reliably red district, but surely there are better candidates. Hopefully one will primary his ass out of there.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2022 9:33 am
by Ivytalk
Anyone heard from Louie Gohmert lately?
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2022 10:16 am
by Ibanez
CID1990 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 31, 2022 8:59 am
Ivytalk wrote:Anything said by Madison Cawthorn (the guy NC Congressman with a girl’s name) is cringeworthy.
I just looked this guy up and all I can say is WTF?
How the hell does this guy even get elected? His only experience at anything is being on Meadows’ staff. I get that he’s from a reliably red district, but surely there are better candidates. Hopefully one will primary his ass out of there.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He is atrocious. Republicans are going to primary against him but they need to coalesce around someone instead of 6 on 1.
Oh, and according to Kevin McCarthy, he lied about the orgy and cocaine. What a tool.
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2022 10:21 pm
by UNI88
Ibanez wrote:CID1990 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 31, 2022 8:59 am
I just looked this guy up and all I can say is WTF?
How the hell does this guy even get elected? His only experience at anything is being on Meadows’ staff. I get that he’s from a reliably red district, but surely there are better candidates. Hopefully one will primary his ass out of there.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He is atrocious. Republicans are going to primary against him but they need to coalesce around someone instead of 6 on 1.
Oh, and according to Kevin McCarthy, he lied about the orgy and cocaine. What a tool.
He's a twat.
Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2022 3:09 am
by houndawg
UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 31, 2022 10:21 pm
Ibanez wrote:
He is atrocious. Republicans are going to primary against him but they need to coalesce around someone instead of 6 on 1.
Oh, and according to Kevin McCarthy, he lied about the orgy and cocaine. What a tool.
He's a twat.
Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk
He may be a twat but he's the norm for today's GOP and his views are the views of the majority of the GOP.
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 9:49 am
by UNI88
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 10:21 am
by UNI88
Duplicate post.
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:05 am
by Ibanez
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:21 am
by UNI88
The interesting thing is that MTG is more pro-pedophile then Collins, Romney or Murkowski.
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:36 am
by CID1990
Im ok with someone voting for her for the circuit and the not voting for her for SCOTUS. They are not the same thing.
I think the concern was that although she gave some lip service to originalism in her confirmation, she was not convincing that she would not be another Sotomayor. As a judge in the DC circuit, there is still a higher court that can regulate that brand of “work backwards from the desired result” jurisprudence. On SCOTUS, there is nobody upstairs to moderate that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:40 am
by Ibanez
CID1990 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:36 am
Ibanez wrote:
Again - the GOP singled out lighter sentences and ignored her more heavy handed ones.
Also - so many Republicans voted for Jackson last year and NOW they have a problem with her.
Political hypocrisy is the worst.
Im ok with someone voting for her for the circuit and the not voting for her for SCOTUS. They are not the same thing.
I think the concern was that although she gave some lip service to originalism in her confirmation, she was not convincing that she would not be another Sotomayor. As a judge in the DC circuit, there is still a higher court that can regulate that brand of “work backwards from the desired result” jurisprudence. On SCOTUS, there is nobody upstairs to moderate that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's still a judicial appointment. Suddenly she isn't good enough b/c of the importance of the post makes for a lousy argument, IMO. I hope Childs gets an upgrade, got to do something for Lady G.
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:54 am
by Ivytalk
Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:40 am
CID1990 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:36 am
Im ok with someone voting for her for the circuit and the not voting for her for SCOTUS. They are not the same thing.
I think the concern was that although she gave some lip service to originalism in her confirmation, she was not convincing that she would not be another Sotomayor. As a judge in the DC circuit, there is still a higher court that can regulate that brand of “work backwards from the desired result” jurisprudence. On SCOTUS, there is nobody upstairs to moderate that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's still a judicial appointment. Suddenly she isn't good enough b/c of the importance of the post makes for a lousy argument, IMO. I hope Childs gets an upgrade, got to do something for Lady G.
CID is absolutely correct. This isn’t the first time Senators have changed their votes on an appellate judge who was later nominated to the SCOTUS. Neil Gorsuch was confirmed to the Tenth Circuit by a unanimous voice vote. Ten years later, he got 45 negative votes for the SCOTUS. Do you want other examples?
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:55 am
by HI54UNI
What's really stupid is Romney voted against her for appeals court but will now vote for her for SCOTUS.
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:58 am
by Ivytalk
HI54UNI wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:55 am
Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:05 am
Again - the GOP singled out lighter sentences and ignored her more heavy handed ones.
Also - so many Republicans voted for Jackson last year and NOW they have a problem with her.
Political hypocrisy is the worst.
What's really stupid is Romney voted against her for appeals court but will now vote for her for SCOTUS.
That is a head-scratcher. Sounds like Mitt might be heading in the “Benedict Jeffords” direction.
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 12:12 pm
by BDKJMU
HI54UNI wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:55 am
Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:05 am
Again - the GOP singled out lighter sentences and ignored her more heavy handed ones.
Also - so many Republicans voted for Jackson last year and NOW they have a problem with her.
Political hypocrisy is the worst.
What's really stupid is Romney voted against her for appeals court but will now vote for her for SCOTUS.
She must have gotten a spot in his Binders Full of Women.
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 12:23 pm
by Ibanez
Ivytalk wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:54 am
Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:40 am
It's still a judicial appointment. Suddenly she isn't good enough b/c of the importance of the post makes for a lousy argument, IMO. I hope Childs gets an upgrade, got to do something for Lady G.
CID is absolutely correct. This isn’t the first time Senators have changed their votes on an appellate judge who was later nominated to the SCOTUS. Neil Gorsuch was confirmed to the Tenth Circuit by a unanimous voice vote. Ten years later, he got 45 negative votes for the SCOTUS. Do you want other examples?
Believe me, I get it, Mr. Snarky response.
I get what Cid is saying about there not being a higher court to check the SCOTUS(though, there are 2 other branches of Gov't). It somewhat makes sense but I can't help but think it's mostly politics. Did they give 2 shits about her pedo sentencing in 2021? But now it's such a problem that they don't trust her judgement.
It's politics and that's enough reason why people are for something one day and then against it later.
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 12:23 pm
by Ibanez
HI54UNI wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:55 am
Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:05 am
Again - the GOP singled out lighter sentences and ignored her more heavy handed ones.
Also - so many Republicans voted for Jackson last year and NOW they have a problem with her.
Political hypocrisy is the worst.
What's really stupid is Romney voted against her for appeals court but will now vote for her for SCOTUS.
Did he really?!
What was his objection to her the first time?
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 12:35 pm
by Ibanez
BDKJMU wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 12:12 pm
HI54UNI wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:55 am
What's really stupid is Romney voted against her for appeals court but will now vote for her for SCOTUS.
She must have gotten a spot in his Binders Full of Women.
You owe me a keyboard, you bastard.
Just spit up hot coffee all over myself.
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 12:59 pm
by Ivytalk
Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 12:23 pm
Ivytalk wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:54 am
CID is absolutely correct. This isn’t the first time Senators have changed their votes on an appellate judge who was later nominated to the SCOTUS. Neil Gorsuch was confirmed to the Tenth Circuit by a unanimous voice vote. Ten years later, he got 45 negative votes for the SCOTUS. Do you want other examples?
Believe me, I get it, Mr. Snarky response.
I get what Cid is saying about there not being a higher court to check the SCOTUS(though, there are 2 other branches of Gov't). It somewhat makes sense but I can't help but think it's mostly politics. Did they give 2 shits about her pedo sentencing in 2021? But now it's such a problem that they don't trust her judgement.
It's politics and that's enough reason why people are for something one day and then against it later.
Coming from the CS master of snarky responses (witness your repeated jousts with BDK), I suppose I should wear your comment as a badge of honor!
Re: MAGAt Squad gaffe and verbal bungles watch
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 1:18 pm
by GannonFan
Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 12:23 pm
Ivytalk wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 11:54 am
CID is absolutely correct. This isn’t the first time Senators have changed their votes on an appellate judge who was later nominated to the SCOTUS. Neil Gorsuch was confirmed to the Tenth Circuit by a unanimous voice vote. Ten years later, he got 45 negative votes for the SCOTUS. Do you want other examples?
Believe me, I get it, Mr. Snarky response.
I get what Cid is saying about there not being a higher court to check the SCOTUS(though, there are 2 other branches of Gov't). It somewhat makes sense but I can't help but think it's mostly politics. Did they give 2 shits about her pedo sentencing in 2021? But now it's such a problem that they don't trust her judgement.
It's politics and that's enough reason why people are for something one day and then against it later.
Politics is also what made Amy Coney Barrett get Democratic votes when she was confirmed to the Appellate Court and then just a couple of years later became the first judge since the turn of the century (the other century) to not get any votes from the minority party in the Senate. It's just what happens in politics.