93henfan wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 5:39 am
Why do the Democrats want to bring Trump down? He’s their only shot at winning in 2024. DeSantis will curb stomp anyone they nominate.
I just find it odd you’d want to kill the golden goose.
Between the Biden Rule that crushed Merrick Garland, Ruth Bader Ginsburg refusing to retire under Obama, Harry Reid dancing on the filibuster, and Hillary Clinton calling half the country deplorable and ordering fake dossiers, that party just doesn’t appear very bright to the layman.
More important to the nation that Trump is exposed and taken down than which party wins the election.
So, about that Hunter Biden laptop and that Hillary Clinton server in the closet at State, and the fake dossier…
Methinks you meant, let’s start doing the right thing now?
I’ve said many times they should be prosecuted. That would be the right thing to do.
I remain pleasantly post partisan.
Re: January 6 - How much do you care?
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2022 8:13 am
by BDKJMU
So you have a witness giving:
-hearsay evidene
-zero corrobation
-zero cross examination
-been publicly disputed by the SS
-allegedly been disputed by the 2 agents in the car
-couldn’t have happened in the vehicle she stated it happened ‘The Beast’ because the POTUS sits in the back and there is a bulletproof barrier between the front and rear seats….but…but…but…but she was under oath!
This is the star witness that the TDSers in their show trial are relying on to convict Trump of…something..so Desantis can run curb stomp Biden/Camala/Hillary/Fill in the Blank
Re: January 6 - How much do you care?
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2022 8:42 am
by Skjellyfetti
BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu Jun 09, 2022 4:45 pm
I will be ignoring the nothingburger..
Re: January 6 - How much do you care?
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2022 9:12 am
by UNI88
BDKJMU wrote:So you have a witness giving:
-hearsay evidene
-zero corrobation
-zero cross examination
-been publicly disputed by the SS
-allegedly been disputed by the 2 agents in the car
-couldn’t have happened in the vehicle she stated it happened ‘The Beast’ because the POTUS sits in the back and there is a bulletproof barrier between the front and rear seats….but…but…but…but she was under oath!
This is the star witness that the TDSers in their show trial are relying on to convict Trump of…something..so Desantis can run curb stomp Biden/Camala/Hillary/Fill in the Blank
So almost as flimsy as the whole election was stolen whine?
Baldy wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 5:28 am
It doesn't work that way. This was the news story of the day. It was on the front page. The media over emphasized the value and wasted countless hours convening panels of "experts" to talk about it. Once it blows up in your face, you're not going to be able to claim 'oh its just small taters now'...
Nope
An anti-Trumper validating the untrue testimony of another anti-Trumper is all the verification I needed.
Keep trying.
Re: January 6 - How much do you care?
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2022 10:23 am
by kalm
BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 8:13 am
So you have a witness giving:
-hearsay evidene
-zero corrobation
-zero cross examination
-been publicly disputed by the SS
-allegedly been disputed by the 2 agents in the car
-couldn’t have happened in the vehicle she stated it happened ‘The Beast’ because the POTUS sits in the back and there is a bulletproof barrier between the front and rear seats….but…but…but…but she was under oath!
This is the star witness that the TDSers in their show trial are relying on to convict Trump of…something..so Desantis can run curb stomp Biden/Camala/Hillary/Fill in the Blank
Admitted hearsay on a less significant part of the testimony. This is ‘A’ star witness. There will be more to come. Political outcomes should be irrelevant when it comes to criminal prosecution.
Be patient, baby bird. You’ll continue to be fed for months.
BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 8:13 am
So you have a witness giving:
-hearsay evidene
-zero corrobation
-zero cross examination
-been publicly disputed by the SS
-allegedly been disputed by the 2 agents in the car
-couldn’t have happened in the vehicle she stated it happened ‘The Beast’ because the POTUS sits in the back and there is a bulletproof barrier between the front and rear seats….but…but…but…but she was under oath!
This is the star witness that the TDSers in their show trial are relying on to convict Trump of…something..so Desantis can run curb stomp Biden/Camala/Hillary/Fill in the Blank
Admitted hearsay on a less significant part of the testimony. This is ‘A’ star witness. There will be more to come. Political outcomes should be irrelevant when it comes to criminal prosecution.
Be patient, baby bird. You’ll continue to be fed for months.
So NO ONE on that committee understands that the event literally couldn’t have happened as she described? They didn’t know that BEFORE she took the stand? what a clown car act show.
BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 8:13 am
So you have a witness giving:
-hearsay evidene
-zero corrobation
-zero cross examination
-been publicly disputed by the SS
-allegedly been disputed by the 2 agents in the car
-couldn’t have happened in the vehicle she stated it happened ‘The Beast’ because the POTUS sits in the back and there is a bulletproof barrier between the front and rear seats….but…but…but…but she was under oath!
This is the star witness that the TDSers in their show trial are relying on to convict Trump of…something..so Desantis can run curb stomp Biden/Camala/Hillary/Fill in the Blank
Admitted hearsay on a less significant part of the testimony. This is ‘A’ star witness. There will be more to come. Political outcomes should be irrelevant when it comes to criminal prosecution.
Be patient, baby bird. You’ll continue to be fed for months.
Of course. The donk 1/6 committee will drag this out until Jan when the conks take control and end the charade..
Baldy wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 10:40 am
Who are in and what is my "circle"?
Good question. Kinda along the lines as to why the committee won't call the several witnesses who can refute her testimony.
+2.
1/6 committee:
“Do we put on the stand the guy who was there to get a first hand account?”
“No, that guy won’t make Trump look bad. Lets put the woman on who wasn’t there, who allegedly heard the story from the guy. Yeah it hearsay, but got to make Trump look bad, whether its true ir not.
1/6 committee:
“Do we put on the stand the guy who was there to get a first hand account?”
“No, that guy won’t make Trump look bad. Lets put the woman on who wasn’t there, who allegedly heard the story from the guy. Yeah it hearsay, but got to make Trump look bad, whether its true ir not.
They already interviewed both those guys. Either didn't want to ask or didn't care.
By the way, the liar is also a leaker and that is why she didn't get a post Presidential gig in Florida. Up to that point, she loved Trump.
BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 8:13 am
So you have a witness giving:
-hearsay evidene
-zero corrobation
-zero cross examination
-been publicly disputed by the SS
-allegedly been disputed by the 2 agents in the car
-couldn’t have happened in the vehicle she stated it happened ‘The Beast’ because the POTUS sits in the back and there is a bulletproof barrier between the front and rear seats….but…but…but…but she was under oath!
This is the star witness that the TDSers in their show trial are relying on to convict Trump of…something..so Desantis can run curb stomp Biden/Camala/Hillary/Fill in the Blank
Admitted hearsay on a less significant part of the testimony. This is ‘A’ star witness. There will be more to come. Political outcomes should be irrelevant when it comes to criminal prosecution.
Be patient, baby bird. You’ll continue to be fed for months.
Except its the part of the testmony that CNN & MSDNC et al keep talking about, and your side keeps fapping over..
BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 8:13 am
So you have a witness giving:
-hearsay evidene
-zero corrobation
-zero cross examination
-been publicly disputed by the SS
-allegedly been disputed by the 2 agents in the car
-couldn’t have happened in the vehicle she stated it happened ‘The Beast’ because the POTUS sits in the back and there is a bulletproof barrier between the front and rear seats….but…but…but…but she was under oath!
This is the star witness that the TDSers in their show trial are relying on to convict Trump of…something..so Desantis can run curb stomp Biden/Camala/Hillary/Fill in the Blank
Admitted hearsay on a less significant part of the testimony. This is ‘A’ star witness. There will be more to come. Political outcomes should be irrelevant when it comes to criminal prosecution.
Be patient, baby bird. You’ll continue to be fed for months.
Spreading hearsay when there are actual people there who contradict her claims. That's not a good look.
Did I do that right?
Lying is a $10 fine.
Re: January 6 - How much do you care?
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2022 5:44 pm
by UNI88
SeattleGriz wrote:
kalm wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 10:23 amAdmitted hearsay on a less significant part of the testimony. This is ‘A’ star witness. There will be more to come. Political outcomes should be irrelevant when it comes to criminal prosecution.
Be patient, baby bird. You’ll continue to be fed for months.
Spreading hearsay when there are actual people there who contradict her claims. That's not a good look.
Did I do that right?
Lying is a $10 fine.
So lying is bad now? Did that start on January 20, 2021?
1/6 committee:
“Do we put on the stand the guy who was there to get a first hand account?”
“No, that guy won’t make Trump look bad. Lets put the woman on who wasn’t there, who allegedly heard the story from the guy. Yeah it hearsay, but got to make Trump look bad, whether its true ir not.
They already interviewed both those guys. Either didn't want to ask or didn't care.
By the way, the liar is also a leaker and that is why she didn't get a post Presidential gig in Florida. Up to that point, she loved Trump.
Worse than Blasey Ford.
Not really. They did a private questioning but nothing of that has been made public that I know of.
For example. I agree that Cheney has a history of being awful when it comes to most positions and her voting record (supported Trump policies like 90% of the time). However, her performance in the committee at least aligns with traditional conservative ideology regarding freedom, democracy, and constitutional law.
It’s like wanting us to sit out the spread of Democratic ideals including the fight against corruption and oligarchy in Ukraine because some conservatives were hypocritical about historical interventions in the Middle East.
She’s not only effective but principled in her role on the J6 committee. That is, if you subscribe to conservative principles of rule of law, freedom, and constitutional rights.
